Intelligent Diagnosis and Treatment System for Pelvic Floor Dysfunction in Elderly Women

June 30, 2024 updated by: Beijing Hospital

The Development and Application of an Intelligent Diagnosis and Treatment System for Pelvic Floor Dysfunction in Elderly Women

The aim of this study is to propose an intelligent diagnosis and treatment system for for pelvic floor dysfunction in elderly women. The main question it aims to answer: 1) How can the investigators find out early if older women have different pelvic floor muscle functions? 2)How can the investigators give personalized treatment plans based on differences in pelvic floor function? Participants will be assigned different training programs by the system. The investigators will compare the treatment effects and costs of older women with pelvic floor dysfunction using and not using the system. All the participants will be offered examinations for pelvic floor function and different treatments. All examinations and treatments are non-invasive.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100005
        • Recruiting
        • Beijing Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Women over 60 years old.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe pelvic organ prolapse (POP-Q stage>III)
  • History of pelvic floor surgery
  • Malignant tumor in pelvic
  • Allergic to nickel
  • Acute inflammation of pelvic or genital tract
  • Subjects who has cognitive impairment and cannot sign an informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Supervised and individualized pelvic floor muscle training
Subjects in the experimental group (EG) will accept individualized pelvic floor muscle training under the introduction of skilled clinicians.
Utilizing machine learning to process and analyze vast amounts of previously collected data, the investigators will establish an intelligent system that can generate personalized pelvic floor exercise prescription by matching factors such as general clinical information and pelvic floor muscle strength data. The experimental group will receive tailored program, including pelvic floor muscle training with diverse intensity and frequency, electrical stimulation, magnetic stimulation, biofeedback and other treatments. The results will ultimately be compared with those taking standardized pelvic floor muscle training only.
Active Comparator: Standard training program
Subjects in the control group(CG) will accept pelvic floor muscle training according to the handbook or oral guidance
Participants will be given handbooks with detailed training program: the basic regimen consists of 3 sets of 8 to 12 contractions sustained for 8 to 10 sec each, performed 3 times a day. Patients should try to do this every day and continue for at least 15 to 20 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Oxford Scale (MOS)
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12
The modified Oxford scale(Mos) is presently the gold standard used to assess pelvic floor muscle strength. Digital assessment of pelvic floor muscle contraction will be performed by the examiner inserting the index and middle fingers approximately 4 cm into the vagina (only the index finger in the case of very narrow hiatus) and palpating the puborectalis muscle at each side of the vagina during contraction. The Modified Oxford Scale (MOS) was used to rate pelvic floor muscle contraction on a scale of 0-5: 0 = no contraction; 1 = minor muscle 'flicker'; 2 = weak muscle contraction; 3 = moderate muscle contraction; 4 = good muscle contraction and 5 = strong muscle contraction.
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12
Surface Electromyography Data
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12
Pelvic floor muscle(PFM) surface electromyography (EMG) testing is one method for assessing the quantity and quality of PFM function. The electromyograms regarding the contraction and relaxation capacity of the PFM will be recorded simultaneously from electrode probes on perineum and adjacent muscles.
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The score of Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF)
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12
The Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) is a questionnaire for evaluating the frequency, severity and impact on quality of life (QoL) of urinary incontinence in research and clinical practice across the world. It is used to screen for incontinence, to obtain a brief yet comprehensive summary of the level, impact and perceived cause of symptoms of incontinence. The ICIQ-UI SF score ranges from 0 to 21. A score of zero means no leakage of urine and no affection on quality of life.
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12
The score of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20)
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12
The Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) is a patient-reported outcome measures that is often used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the distress caused by the presence of pelvic floor dysfunction. It assesses the distress of pelvic organ prolapse (POP), anorectal and urinary symptoms in three subscales, respectively. PFDI-20 summary score ranges from 0 to 300. It is interpreted as the higher the score, the worse the distress.
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12
Subjective staging used Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) System
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12
The POP-Q describes descent of the anterior and posterior vaginal wall and uterine cervix or, after hysterectomy, the vaginal vault, relative to the hymen on maximal Valsalva maneuver. In clinical practice, the POP-Q is often used to stratify findings into stages - Stage 0 (normal) and Stages 1-4 (prolapse).
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Mi Li, Ph.D., Beijing Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 30, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 10, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 3, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data obtained through this study may be provided to qualified researchers with academic interest in pelvic floor muscle dysfunction. Data or samples shared will be coded, with no protected health information (PHI) included. Approval of the request and execution of all applicable agreements (i.e. a material transfer agreement) are prerequisites to the sharing of data with the requesting party.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data requests can be submitted starting 12 months after article publication and the data will be made accessible for up to 24 months. Extensions will be considered on a case-by-case basis.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access to trial individual participant data (IPD) can be requested by qualified researchers engaging in independent scientific research, and will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal and Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) and execution of a Data Sharing Agreement (DSA). For more information or to submit a request, please contact mindy99999@126.com.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urinary Incontinence

Clinical Trials on Personalized pelvic floor rehabilitation program generated by the intelligent diagnosis and treatment system.

Subscribe