RHA® Redensity With New Anesthetic Agent Perioral Rhytids (PAS)

April 8, 2025 updated by: Teoxane SA

A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blinded, Within-subject (Split-face), Multicenter, Prospective Clinical Study to Compare the Level of Pain Using the Dermal Filler RHA® Redensity Formulated With Two Different Anesthetics in the Treatment of Perioral Rhytids

This is a randomized, controlled, double-blinded, within-subject (split-face), multicenter, prospective study to investigate whether RHA® Redensity with new anesthetic agent is non-inferior to RHA® Redensity with lidocaine in terms of injection site pain felt by the subject during injection.

At screening, the Principal Investigator (PI) evaluated subjects' perioral rhytid severity (using the Perioral Rhytid Severity Rating Scale; PR-SRS) to confirm eligibility and to establish a pre-treatment score for assessing aesthetic improvement.

At Visit 1, RHA® Redensity with new anesthetic agent was administered in a random sequence (first or second injection) and side of the mouth (left or right) and RHA® Redensity with lidocaine was administered to the other side. Study subjects and the PI injecting study devices were blinded.

Immediately after injection of an upper perioral quadrant, subjects rated the injection site pain experienced during injection using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Injection site pain in each side of the mouth was also assessed at 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes after injection of the upper quadrant.

Safety evaluation consisted of AE assessments, a 30-day CTR (Common Treatment Response) diary and a follow-up call performed by the study site at 72 hours after injection.

Subjects attended Visit 2 (30 days post-injection) where effectiveness and safety assessments were conducted.

Subjects who presented with an unresolved clinically significant device related AE at Visit 2 received a optional follow-up phone call no later than 30 days after Visit 2.

If the clinically significant AE remained unresolved, the Investigator requested that the subject attended the optional in-clinic follow-up visit (i.e., Visit 3) within 5 working days. Follow-up of the clinically significant AE continued until the AE was resolved or the TI determines that additional follow-up was not necessary.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • San Juan, Puerto Rico, 00917
        • Puerto Rico
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35209
        • United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10028
        • United States, New York

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Outpatient, male or female of any race, 22 years of age or older. Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative UPT at Visit 1 and practice a reliable method of contraception throughout the study.
  2. Perioral rhytids of the same PR-SRS grade on the left and right sides of the mouth.
  3. Able to follow study instructions and complete all required visits.
  4. Sign the IRB-approved ICF, Photographic Release Form, the Authorization for Use and release of Health and Research Study Information (HIPAA) form, and if applicable the California Experimental Research Subject's Bill of Rights prior to any study-related procedures being performed.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Female subjects who are pregnant, breast-feeding, or of childbearing potential and not practicing reliable birth control.
  2. Known hypersensitivity or previous allergic reaction to any component of the study devices.
  3. Known sensitivity to local anesthetics of the amide type, history of multiple severe allergies, or history of anaphylactic shock.
  4. Clinically significant active skin disease or infection in the perioral area within 6 months prior to study entry (TI discretion).
  5. History of active chronic debilitating systemic disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would make the subject a poor candidate in the study.
  6. Malignancy (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) within the past 5 years.
  7. History or presence of condition or feature that may confound the interpretation of the results in the perioral region, for example, tattoo, significant facial hair, acne scaring, prior surgery in the area, potential for active disease or infection flare up such as herpes simplex.
  8. History of skin cancer in the treatment area.
  9. Elective, clinically significant facial procedures that may confound the interpretation of the results in the perioral region (TI discretion), prior to study enrollment.
  10. Clinically active disease or infection in the perioral area or mouth (e.g., dental abscess).
  11. Clinically significant alcohol or drug abuse, or history of poor cooperation or unreliability.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: RHA® Redensity with new anesthetic agent

Split-face injection of RHA® Redensity with new anesthetic agent in the perioral rhytids on one side of the mouth and RHA® Redensity with lidocaine in the perioral rhytids in the other side of the mouth.

Up to 3 mL injected per side.

A sterile, biodegradable, biocompatible, viscoelastic, clear, colorless, homogenized gel implant. It consists of cross-linked hyaluronic acid produced by fermentation of Streptococcus zooepidemicus, formulated to a concentration of 15 mg/g and 0.3% w/w of new anesthetic agent in a physiologic buffer.
Experimental: RHA® Redensity with lidocaine

Split-face injection of RHA® Redensity with new anesthetic agent in the perioral rhytids on one side of the mouth and RHA® Redensity with lidocaine in the perioral rhytids in the other side of the mouth.

Up to 3 mL injected per side.

A sterile, biodegradable, biocompatible, viscoelastic, clear, colorless, homogenized gel implant. It consists of cross-linked hyaluronic acid produced by fermentation of Streptococcus zooepidemicus, formulated to a concentration of 15 mg/g and 0.3% w/w lidocaine in a physiologic buffer.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Non-inferiority of RHA® Redensity with new anesthetic agent versus RHA® Redensity with lidocaine in terms of reducing pain during device injection into the upper perioral rhytids.
Time Frame: Visit 1 - During Injection

Injection pain during injection was measured on the 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), as assessed by subjects immediately after injection of each upper perioral quadrant.

VAS is a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale with 0 meaning no pain and 100 meaning intolerable pain

Visit 1 - During Injection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference between RHA® Redensity with new anesthetic agent versus RHA® Redensity with lidocaine in term of reducing pain at 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes post-injection in each side of the mouth.
Time Frame: Visit 1 - 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes post-injection

Injection pain was measured on the 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), as assessed by subjects in each side of the mouth.

VAS is a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale with 0 meaning no pain and 100 meaning intolerable pain

Visit 1 - 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes post-injection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 11, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 26, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 17, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on RHA® Redensity with new anesthetic agent

Subscribe