- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06379477
Correction of Refractive Error Surprises After Cataract Surgery in Adults
April 22, 2024 updated by: Abdelrahman Mohamed saad, Assiut University
A refractive surprise can be defined as the failure to achieve the intended postoperative refractive target or the presentation of unexpected and, unwanted post-operative refractive error.
It can cause anisometropia or dominance switch and is a source of patient dissatisfaction due to unmet expectations.The best way to manage refractive surprise is to prevent it.
The 2017 NICE guidelines on the management of cataracts provide advice on prevention of refractive surprise through accurate biometry, A-constant optimisation, intraocular lens (IOL) formula selection and avoiding wrong lens implant errors.Benchmark standards for NHS cataract surgery dictate that 85% of eyes should be within 1 dioptre (D) and 55% within 0.5D of target spherical equivalent refraction following surgery.
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Aim(s) of the Research:
- detection of refractive surprises using autorefractometer, and corneal topography.
- treatment of the resulting refractive error surprises.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
63
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Abdelrahman M Saad, MSC
- Phone Number: +201067895256
- Email: arabasdm.23@gmail.com
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
All adult patients scheduled for cataract surgery with:
- Symptomatizing patients with postoperative spherical error of more than 1 diopters.
- Symptomatizing patients with postoperative cylindrical error of more than 1 diopters.
- Symptomatizing patients with uncorrected distant visual acuity less than 6/24
- Symptomatizing patients with corrected distant visual acuity of less than 6/12
- Clear cornea. 6. Uneventful surgery.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with complicated cataract.
- Raised intraocular pressure (IOP).
- Patients with pathologies of the posterior segment of the eye.
- Other causes of diminution of vision.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Corneal refractive surgery
Among patients scheduled for cataract surgery, Group I; will undergo Corneal refractive surgery to correct any post-operative refractive surprises.
|
after primary phacoemulsification surgery any resulting refractive error surprises will be corrected with different refractive surgery options
|
|
Active Comparator: IOL exchange
Among patients scheduled for cataract surgery, Group II; will undergo IOL exchange to correct any post-operative refractive surprises.
|
after primary phacoemulsification surgery any resulting refractive error surprises will be corrected with different refractive surgery options
|
|
Active Comparator: Piggyback sulcus IOL
Among patients scheduled for cataract surgery, Group III; will undergo Piggyback sulcus IOL to correct any post-operative refractive surprises.
|
after primary phacoemulsification surgery any resulting refractive error surprises will be corrected with different refractive surgery options
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Diagnosis and treatment of the resulting refractive error surprises
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Rate of refractive error surprises
|
Baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Magdy M Mostafa, MD, Assiut University
- Study Director: Mohamed S Hussien, MD, Assiut University
- Study Director: Ali N Ryad, MD, Assiut University
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Abdelghany AA, Alio JL. Surgical options for correction of refractive error following cataract surgery. Eye Vis (Lond). 2014 Oct 16;1:2. doi: 10.1186/s40662-014-0002-2. eCollection 2014.
- Day AC, Donachie PH, Sparrow JM, Johnston RL; Royal College of Ophthalmologists' National Ophthalmology Database. The Royal College of Ophthalmologists' National Ophthalmology Database study of cataract surgery: report 1, visual outcomes and complications. Eye (Lond). 2015 Apr;29(4):552-60. doi: 10.1038/eye.2015.3. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
- Gale RP, Saldana M, Johnston RL, Zuberbuhler B, McKibbin M. Benchmark standards for refractive outcomes after NHS cataract surgery. Eye (Lond). 2009 Jan;23(1):149-52. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702954. Epub 2007 Aug 24.
- Khoramnia R, Auffarth G, Labuz G, Pettit G, Suryakumar R. Refractive Outcomes after Cataract Surgery. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jan 19;12(2):243. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020243.
- Moshirfar M, Thomson AC, Thomson RJ, Martheswaran T, McCabe SE. Refractive enhancements for residual refractive error after cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan;32(1):54-61. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000717.
- Ladas JG, Stark WJ. Improving cataract surgery refractive outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2011 Sep;118(9):1699-700. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.05.038. No abstract available.
- Iwase T, Tanaka N, Sugiyama K. Postoperative refraction changes in phacoemulsification cataract surgery with implantation of different types of intraocular lens. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2008 May-Jun;18(3):371-6. doi: 10.1177/112067210801800310.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
June 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 31, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 22, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 22, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
April 23, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 23, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 22, 2024
Last Verified
April 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- refractive error surprises
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Refractive Errors
-
Suzan A RattanCompletedRefractive Errors | Refractive SurgeryIraq
-
London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineBritish Council for Prevention of Blindness; Tanzanian Society for the BlindCompletedUnder- and Uncorrected Significant Refractive ErrorsTanzania
-
Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Essilor InternationalRecruitingRefractive Error | MyopiaChina
-
Chulalongkorn UniversityNot yet recruitingRefractive Errors
-
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.CompletedRefractive ErrorUnited States
-
Sun Yat-sen UniversityQueen's University, Belfast; Orbis; Aravind Eye Care System; Padmashree Dr. D.... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
Asociación para Evitar la Ceguera en MéxicoTerminated
Clinical Trials on Refractive surgeries
-
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical...CompletedNSCLC, Stage III | NSCLC, Stage I | NSCLC, Stage IIChina
-
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical...UnknownNon-small Cell Lung CancerChina
-
Henan Cancer HospitalLinkDoc Technology (Beijing) Co. Ltd.Unknown
-
Chinese PLA General HospitalLinkDoc Technology (Beijing) Co. Ltd.Completed
-
Jiangsu Cancer Institute & HospitalCompletedNon Small Cell Lung CancerChina
-
China-Japan Friendship HospitalLinkDoc Technology (Beijing) Co. Ltd.CompletedNon-small Cell Lung CancerChina
-
Tang-Du HospitalLinkDoc Technology (Beijing) Co. Ltd.UnknownNon Small Cell Lung CancerChina
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Maharishi Markendeswar University (Deemed to be...Not yet recruitingNeonatal Disorder