Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Angina and Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries (TENS-ANOCA)

May 2, 2024 updated by: Inge Wijnbergen, Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven

The Novel Use of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Angina and Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries: a Pilot Study

In patients with angina pectoris undergoing a coronary angiography (CAG) up to 40% do not have obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). The majority of patients with no obstructive CAD are women with a frequency of up to 70% compared to 50% in men. These patients are diagnosed as having angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA). There are two endotypes of ANOCA. The first endotype is microvascular angina (MVA) caused by a combination of structural microcirculatory remodelling and functional arteriolar dysregulation, also called coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). The second endotype is vasospastic angina (VSA) caused by epicardial coronary artery spasm that occurs when a hyper-reactive epicardial coronary segment is exposed to a vasoconstrictor stimulus. Both endotypes of ANOCA are associated with significantly greater one-year risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and all-cause mortality, have a significantly impaired quality of life and have a high health care resource utilisation.

The current treatment for ANOCA consists of three aspects. The first aspect is managing lifestyle factors such as weight management, smoking cessation and exercise. The second aspect is managing known cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension, dyslipidaemia and diabetes mellitus. And the third aspect is antianginal medication. In both endotypes ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers should be considered. In MVA the antianginal medication that can be used are betablocker, calcium channel blocker, nicorandil, ranolazine, ivabradine and/or trimetazidine. In VSA calcium channel blocker, long-acting nitrate and/or nicorandil can be initiated as antianginal therapy. Despite these treatment option approximately 25% of ANOCA patients have refractory angina symptoms.

A possible treatment modality for ANOCA patients with refractory angina pectoris is spinal cord stimulation (SCS) or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). Previous research (in patients with cardiac syndrome X) has shown that SCS improves time until angina and ischaemia, significantly less angina and an improvement in quality of life. These findings suggest that SCS and/or TENS could be a possible treatment modality for patients with ANOCA.

The aim of this pilot study is to investigate whether treatment with TENS during a one month period leads to a significant reduction of angina pectoris and therefore a significant improvement in quality of life in patients with proven ANOCA, encompassing both endotypes (MVA and VSA).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) (CCS class III or IV)
  • Microvascular angina (MVA):

    • FFR > 0.8
    • CFR < 2.0
    • IMR ≥ 25
  • Vasospastic angina (VSA):

    • FFR > 0.8
    • CFR ≥ 2.0
    • IMR < 25
    • During acetylcholine testing: ≥ 90% diameter reduction, angina pectoris and ischaemic ECG changes
  • Persisting angina pectoris despite optimal medical therapy (OMT) defined as:

    • MVA: Betablocker, calcium channel blocker, nicorandil and/or ivabradine (Important side note: ranolazine and trimetazidine cannot be prescribed in the Netherlands).
    • VSA: Calcium channel blocker, long-acting nitrate and/or nicorandil. In the maximum tolerated dose. If the patient is currently not using one of the medications due to side-effects, this should be clearly stated.
  • Age > 18 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Both endotypes (VSA and MVA) present based on CFT findings.
  • Inability to give informed consent
  • Inability to perform a 6-minute walking test
  • The presence of a cardiac implanted electronic device (CIED); pacemaker and/or Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator (ICD). Due to the risk of interference between TENS and CIED
  • Presence of a spinal cord stimulator for another indication such as complex regional pain syndrome, failed back surgery syndrome, etc.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Open label
See intervention: all patients included in the study will receive TENS treatment for a period of 1 month
Device consists of two electrodes that are applied to the chest region and are connected to a battery operated TENS (Frequency 80Hz, pulse width 150us and amplitude variable (patient dependent)). The device will be used a minimum of three times daily for 30 minutes and additionally during symptoms.
Other Names:
  • TENS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in summary score of Seattle Angina Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline; 1 month
Change in the summary score of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SS SAQ) after 1 month treatment with TENS, compared to baseline.
Baseline; 1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in physical limitations domain of Seattle Angina Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline; 1 month
Change in physical limitations domain of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (PL SAQ) after 1 month treatment with TENS, compared to baseline.
Baseline; 1 month
Change in angina frequency domain of Seattle Angina Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline; 1 month
Change in angina frequency domain of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (AF SAQ) after 1 month treatment with TENS, compared to baseline.
Baseline; 1 month
Change in angina stability domain of Seattle Angina Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline; 1 month
Change in angina stability domain of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (AS SAQ) after 1 month treatment with TENS, compared to baseline.
Baseline; 1 month
Change in treatment satisfaction domain of Seattle Angina Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline; 1 month
Change in treatment satisfaction domain of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (TS SAQ) after 1 month treatment with TENS, compared to baseline.
Baseline; 1 month
Change in quality of life domain of Seattle Angina Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline; 1 month
Change in quality of life domain of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (QoL SAQ) after 1 month treatment with TENS, compared to baseline.
Baseline; 1 month
Changes in patient condition
Time Frame: Baseline; 1 month
Change in patient condition using the 6-minute walking test after 1 month treatment with TENS, compared to baseline
Baseline; 1 month
Change in CCS class
Time Frame: Baseline; 1 month
Change in grading of angina pectoris using the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class after 1 month treatment with TENS compared to baseline
Baseline; 1 month

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Side effects of TENS use
Time Frame: 1 month
Register all side effects (such as skin irritation, tenderness and/or TENS discomfort) experienced by the patient over the 1 month treatment period
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 13, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 2, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Microvascular Angina

Clinical Trials on Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation

Subscribe