iExposure Intervention for Social Anxiety

March 5, 2026 updated by: Mikael Rubin, Palo Alto University

Testing the Role of Attentional and Audio Vocal Mechanisms in a New Internet- Based Intervention for Social Anxiety: iExposure

Social anxiety (SA) is a highly prevalent mental health concern, thought to disproportionately affect youth with recent international estimates of more than 30% of individuals reporting clinically elevated symptoms. Despite the prevalence of SA, as few as one in five individuals receive care, due to limited access to evidence-based treatments. Additionally there has been a notable increase in social anxiety since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. This proposal will use iExposure to develop a personalized mechanism-focused approach to optimizing treatment response for individuals with social anxiety by testing standard iExposure against two augmentations that incorporate distinct attention mechanisms (attention guidance and attention control).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

390

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304
        • Palo Alto University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 or older
  • Fluent in English
  • Leibowitz Social Anxiety Scale > 47 and endorses both social anxiety items on the Web Screening Questionnaire for Common Mental Disorders

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently receiving CBT for Social Anxiety Disorder
  • Significant visual impairment precluding engagement in the simulated teleconferencing interactions
  • Unstable dose of psychotropic medications within 6 weeks prior to baseline assessment
  • Current alcohol or substance use disorder
  • Current or past bipolar disorder or psychosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard iExposure

iExposure. Participants will complete four intervention sessions within two weeks. The intervention will use an entirely self-guided protocol delivered via Qualtrics and Gorilla Experiment Builder:

  1. During the first session, participants will receive a brief standardized psychoeducation module, presented via a 15-minute video recording. This video will explain the intervention, its rationale, and the procedure.
  2. Participants will then complete 10 simulated teleconferencing interaction trials with different topics, each lasting a maximum of two minutes. During each call participants will be prompted by one of the audience members to respond to a question (described in further detail in the Materials section, below).
  3. Participants will complete the Subjective Units of Distress Scale before and after each speech trial.
  4. Sessions 2-4 involve the same protocol and the four intervention sessions are completed within two weeks.
There will be 4 treatment sessions, covering the iExposure intervention. The intervention and assessment process is entirely self-guided. Each session will last approximately 60 minutes. Participants will complete 10 mock-interaction trials for each session.
Experimental: iExposure + Attention Guidance Augmentation
Attention Guidance Augmentation. The attention guidance condition consists of two unique components in addition to the standard iExposure intervention: (1) the intervention rationale will include information about the importance of visually attending to the faces of the audience; (2) participants will be given a target audience member to focus their gaze on during each impromptu response. They will be told that they should look at and focus on the target audience member for the whole response. In each progressive session the number of trials where the participant is directed to focus on an uninterested audience member will increase.
The attention guidance condition consists of two unique components in addition to the standard iExposure intervention: (1) the intervention rationale will include information about the importance of visually attending to the faces of the audience; (2) participants will be given a target audience member to focus their gaze on during each impromptu response. They will be told that they should look at and focus on the target audience member for the whole response. In each progressive session the number of trials where the participant is directed to focus on an uninterested audience member will increase.
Experimental: iExposure + Attention Control Augmentation
The attention control condition consists of two unique components in addition to the standard iExposure intervention (1) the intervention rationale will include information about the importance of developing attention control; (2) participants will be given a central region of the screen (non-audience member) to focus on. They will be told that they should look at and focus on the central region for the whole response.
The attention control condition consists of two unique components in addition to the standard iExposure intervention (1) the intervention rationale will include information about the importance of developing attention control; (2) participants will be given a central region of the screen (non-audience member) to focus on. They will be told that they should look at and focus on the central region for the whole response.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale Self Report Version
Time Frame: 0 days
The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale Self Report Version is a 48-item self-report measure of fear and avoidance concerning social interactions and performance situations (e.g., telephoning in public, talking to people in authority). The range of scores is 0-144; higher scores are worse.
0 days
Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale Self Report Version
Time Frame: 15 days
The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale Self Report Version is a 48-item self-report measure of fear and avoidance concerning social interactions and performance situations (e.g., telephoning in public, talking to people in authority). The range of scores is 0-144; higher scores are worse.
15 days
Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale Self Report Version
Time Frame: 45 days
The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale Self Report Version is a 48-item self-report measure of fear and avoidance concerning social interactions and performance situations (e.g., telephoning in public, talking to people in authority). The range of scores is 0-144; higher scores are worse.
45 days
Personal Report of Communication Apprehension (PRCA)
Time Frame: 0 days
The Personal Report of Communication Apprehension is a 24-item that assesses anxiety related to speaking in a variety of situation. The range of scores is 24-120; higher scores are worse.
0 days
Personal Report of Communication Apprehension
Time Frame: 15 days
The Personal Report of Communication Apprehension is a 24-item that assesses anxiety related to speaking in a variety of situation. The range of scores is 24-120; higher scores are worse.
15 days
Personal Report of Communication Apprehension
Time Frame: 45 days
The Personal Report of Communication Apprehension is a 24-item that assesses anxiety related to speaking in a variety of situation. The range of scores is 24-120; higher scores are worse.
45 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale - Revised
Time Frame: 0 days
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale - Revised is a 20-item measure of depression. The range of scores is 0-60; higher scores are worse.
0 days
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale - Revised
Time Frame: 15 days
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale - Revised is a 20-item measure of depression. The range of scores is 0-60; higher scores are worse.
15 days
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale - Revised
Time Frame: 45 days
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale - Revised is a 20-item measure of depression. The range of scores is 0-60; higher scores are worse.
45 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 7, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 7, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 10, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2023-052-PAU

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

IPD will be shared as part of the National Institute of Mental Health Data Archive

IPD Sharing Time Frame

All publications will be posted to the PubMed database, consistent with the National Institutes of Health Public Access Policy and have an NDA study linking the analytical output to the underlying data collection, including a description of the analytic methodology, derived variables, and the statistical/analytical model outputs. Each of these studies is assigned a digital object identifier (DOI). This data DOI will be included in any resulting manuscripts to facilitate easy access to the data used for the publication. Data not previously shared through an NDA study will be made available at the end of the project period. Researchers will request data using standard NDA application processes, and the NDA committee will decide which requests are provided. The standard NDA access process allows access for one year and is renewable. Once the data are submitted to NDA, NDA will control the long-term persistence of the data.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access will be controlled by the National Institute of Mental Health Data Archive Data Access Committee

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Social Anxiety

Subscribe