Tooth Borne Versus Temporary Anchorage Devices (TAD) Based Intrusion Systems for the Correction of Anterior Deep Overbite

Tooth Borne Versus Temporary Anchorage Devices Based Intrusion Systems for the Correction of Anterior Deep Overbite;Oral Hygiene, Pain and Treatment Effect

Compare the tooth borne versus fixed orthodontic intrusive system (TADs) for the correction of anterior deep overbite

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Deep Overbite
• Intervention / Treatment: Device: Intrusion

Detailed Description

this study determined which method was more compliant, efficacy and comfortable. It was performed to evaluate intrusion of upper incisors with applying tooth borne system as Connecticut Intrusion Arch (CIA) and temporary anchorage devices (TADs) [miniscrew] and evaluate the dental and skeletal cephalometric effects of these intrusion methods on individuals with deep bite caused by supraocclusion of upper incisors. It also evaluated oral hygiene and pain sensation in the two groups during the study period.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 16
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Egypt
  • Cairo, Egypt
    • Al-Azhar University

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: Child; Adult
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Class I or Class II malocclusion with minimal crowding.
2. 70% to 100% overbite.
3. High lip line with gingival display on smiling and super-eruption of maxillary incisors.
4. All patients had permanent dentition with average to vertical growth pattern and curve of Spee of 4mm or less.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Having missing teeth on the anterior maxillary area.
2. Any history of trauma or root canal treatment.
3. Previous orthodontic treatment.
4. Low lip line duing social smile.
5. Having any hormonal disorder or syndromes.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mninscrew; Miniscrews for incisor intrusion	Device: Intrusion; 2 different methods for incisor intrusion
Experimental: Intrusive arch; Continuous arch technique for incisor intrusion	Device: Intrusion; 2 different methods for incisor intrusion

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Measure distance of insicors intrusion	measure in mm the distance of apical movement	2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Pain intensity	By unit on Visual Analogue Scale	8 months

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): September 25, 2022
• Primary Completion (Actual): February 2, 2024
• Study Completion (Actual): March 27, 2024

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: May 10, 2024
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: May 24, 2024
• First Posted (Actual): May 28, 2024

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): May 28, 2024
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: May 24, 2024
• Last Verified: May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Miniscrews; Anterior deep bite; Intrusive arch
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Stomatognathic Diseases; Tooth Diseases; Malocclusion; Malocclusion, Angle Class II; Overbite
• Other Study ID Numbers: ORTHO-109-2H

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No