RIB for Perioperative Analgesia in CIED Patients

May 10, 2025 updated by: Kerem Erkalp, MD, Prof, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa

Outcomes of Rhomboid Intercostal Plane Block on Local Anesthesia in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Implantation: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Rhomboid intercostal plane block (RIB) has been described in the last decade. Various clinical applications have been found to provide hemithorax analgesia. The use of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is increasing due to comorbidities in the elderly population. Increased myocardial stress with pain in these patients may increase the frequency of adverse cardiac events. Therefore, perioperative pain management ensures patient welfare, reduces complications, and maintains stable hemodynamic values. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the outcomes of RIB in terms of perioperative analgesia and patient and physician satisfaction in patients undergoing CIED.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In accordance with the study design, a randomization list for the two groups is generated by an independent individual using a computer-assisted program (www.randomizer.org). Equal numbers of participants are assigned to either the intervention or control group in a 1:1 ratio. Patients included in the study will be randomized into two groups of 25 patients each. One group (local anaesthesia group - LAG) will receive only local anaesthesia (prilocaine 2%) as per the standard procedure of the institution. The other group (RIB group - RIBG) will receive RIB in addition to the standard procedure. Demographic and clinical data regarding the patients and the procedures performed will be recorded. Information about the first and second rescue treatments in cases of pain during the procedure, as well as the first and second rescue treatments during postoperative follow-up, will also be documented in the same database. Pain levels during the procedure, at the end of the procedure, and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively will be assessed using the NRS-11. Patient and physician satisfaction will be evaluated using a five-point Likert scale. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of RIB in patients undergoing CIED implantation by performing pain assessments with the Numeric Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11) during the procedure and the postoperative period. As a secondary outcome, patient and physician satisfaction levels will be assessed during the procedure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

53

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey
        • Istanbul Universtiy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • over 18 years of age,
  • no previous ICD or Pacemaker implantation attempt
  • ASA ( American Society of Anesthesiologists ) score of 2-3,
  • INR < 2.0 ,
  • Signing the volunteer consent form,
  • Patients who met the study criteria will be included in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Morbidly obese patients (BMI>35 kg/m2),
  • Advanced decompensated heart failure with New York Heart Association (NYHA) stage 4,
  • Having severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,
  • Allergy to the prescribed medications ,
  • Those who have a skin infection or lesion in the area to be blocked,
  • Cannot be communicated and cannot be given a position,
  • Severe psychosis and progressive neurological deficits and muscle disease,
  • ICD/ Pacemaker revision or upgrade to be made,
  • ICD battery replacement
  • Pregnant patients will be excluded from the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: block group
local anesthesia will be applied to surgical field as a part of the routine procedure and additionally rhomboid intercostal plane block will be applied

Local anesthesia 400 mg(20ml) prilocaine 2% to surgical field and additionally ultrasound-guided RIB with 0,25% bupivacaine 20 ml will be applied to the patients who will be inserted cardiac implantable electronic devices An additional 100 mg of prilocaine will be administered as the first-line rescue treatment if the intraoperative NRS-11 score was ≥4.If the patient has an NRS-11 score of ≥4 again during the procedure,100 mg of prilocaine will be administered again as the second rescue treatment.

In the postoperative follow-up of the patients,1 g of paracetamol will be administered IV as an infusion for 20 minutes as the first rescue treatment if the patients have an NRS-11 pain score of ≥4. Two hours after IV paracetamol,if the NRS-11 score≥4, 50 mg of tramadol HCL will be administered IV as the second rescue treatment.In addition, when the NRS score is ≥4 at follow-up, paracetamol 1 g, IV will be administered with dosing intervals not shorter than 6 hours.

Sham Comparator: control group
only local anesthesia will be applied to surgical field as a part of the routine procedure.

Only local anesthesia 400 mg(20ml) prilocaine 2% prilocaine to surgical field will be applied to the patients who will be inserted cardiac implantable electronic devices.

An additional 100 mg of prilocaine will be administered as the first-line rescue treatment if the intraoperative NRS-11 score was ≥4.If the patient has an NRS-11 score of ≥4 again during the procedure,100 mg of prilocaine will be administered again as the second rescue treatment.

In the postoperative follow-up of the patients,1 g of paracetamol will be administered IV as an infusion for 20 minutes as the first rescue treatment if the patients have an NRS-11 pain score of ≥4. Two hours after IV paracetamol,if the NRS-11 score≥4, 50 mg of tramadol HCL will be administered IV as the second rescue treatment.In addition, when the NRS score is ≥4 at follow-up, paracetamol (1 g, IV) will be administered with dosing intervals not shorter than 6 hours.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The pain will be assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale-11(NRS -11). Minimum pain score is point zero, maximum pain score is ten points.
Time Frame: 4 months
to measure the analgesic efficacy of RIB
4 months
Investigation patient and physician satisfaction assessed by 5-point Likert scale. One point represents strongly unsatisfied and 5 points represent strongly satisfied.
Time Frame: 4 months
For patient and physician satisfaction;5-point Likert scale will be used.
4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Kerem Erkalp, Proffessor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 4, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 15, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

January 15, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 27, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 10, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 14, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on ultrasound

Subscribe