Low-calorie Diet in Isolated Impaired Fasting Glucose

January 8, 2026 updated by: Sathish Thirunavukkarasu, Emory University

Effect of Dietary Energy Restriction on Reversing Isolated Impaired Fasting Glucose: A Proof of Concept Study

This study aims to evaluate the preliminary efficacy of a low-calorie diet (LCD) intervention in addressing the underlying pathophysiological abnormalities and improving fasting hyperglycemia among individuals with isolated impaired fasting glucose (i-IFG). Additionally, it seeks to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the LCD intervention.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This proof-of-concept randomized controlled trial (RCT) will enroll 34 individuals aged 35-65 years with overweight or obesity and isolated impaired fasting glucose. Intervention participants will adhere to an 8-week low-calorie dietary (LCD) regimen (~1,320 kcal/day) comprising specific macronutrient proportions (55% carbohydrate, 13% fat, 25% protein, and 2% fiber). Control participants will maintain their habitual dietary habits and physical activity levels. Primary outcomes at 8 weeks include between-group changes in weight, fasting plasma glucose, indices of ß-cell function and hepatic insulin resistance, and alanine aminotransferase levels. Secondary outcomes are feasibility metrics (response rate, screening yield, enrollment rate, intervention compliance, cost, staff time, and retention rate) and intervention acceptability. Qualitative research will explore facilitators, barriers, acceptability, satisfaction, and participant experiences with the LCD intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

34

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Georgia Clinical & Translational Science Alliance (CTSA) Clinical Research Centers (GCRCs)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Aged 35 to 65 years
  2. Overweight (body mass index (BMI) ≥25 to <29 kg/m² or ≥23 to <29 kg/m² if Asian descent) or Obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m²)
  3. Physically inactive (<150 minutes per week of moderate-intensity physical activity or <75 minutes per week of vigorous-intensity physical activity)
  4. Prediabetes diagnosis or score ≥5 on the American Diabetes Association (ADA) risk tool

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosed with type 1 or type 2 diabetes
  2. Cardiovascular disease (myocardial infarction, stroke, angina, heart failure, or other cardiac conditions)
  3. Chronic kidney disease
  4. Chronic liver disease (e.g., cirrhosis)
  5. Cancers
  6. Acute inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome, celiac disease, chronic pancreatitis, or other disorders potentially causing malabsorption
  7. Food allergies
  8. Participation in weight loss programs in the past six months
  9. Currently following a specific diet (e.g., ketogenic diet, Mediterranean diet)
  10. Participation in any exercise programs in the past six months
  11. Currently taking weight-loss medications or drugs known to affect glycemia (steroids and antipsychotics)
  12. Previous bariatric surgery or plan to have bariatric surgery during the study period
  13. Planning to relocate during the study period
  14. Intending to fast during the study period for religious or other reasons
  15. Pregnancy or planning to become pregnant during the study period
  16. Breastfeeding
  17. Non-English speaker

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Low-calorie diet
Participants following a low-calorie diet (LCD) consisting of approximately 1,300 kcal/day (37% carbohydrates, 25% protein, 39% fat, and 7 g of fiber per meal) over an eight-week period.
The low-calorie diet consists of approximately 1,300 kcal/day (37% carbohydrates, 25% protein, 39% fat, and 7 g of fiber per meal) over an eight-week period. Participants receive weekly pre-prepared meals from Trifecta Nutrition (Trifecta Inc. California, USA) with options for breakfast, lunch, and dinner, meticulously crafted by certified dieticians and expert chefs. Participants are encouraged to consume 1-2 liters of water daily and maintain their habitual physical activity levels.
Other Names:
  • Dietary energy restriction
Active Comparator: Routine dietary and physical activity habits
Control participants are asked to maintain their routine dietary and physical activity habits.
Participants are asked to maintain their habitual dietary and physical activity habits for the 8-week study period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Response rate
Time Frame: Baseline
Response rate is defined as the proportion of individuals responding to the invitation sent via the Epic database.
Baseline
Screening yield
Time Frame: Baseline
Screening yield: Proportion of screened individuals meeting eligibility criteria.
Baseline
Enrollment rate
Time Frame: Baseline
Enrollment rate: Proportion of eligible individuals who enroll in the study.
Baseline
Resource utilization
Time Frame: Throughout the study period, an average of 10 weeks
Resource utilization: Assessment of expenditures and staff time.
Throughout the study period, an average of 10 weeks
Retention rate
Time Frame: 4 and 8 weeks
Retention rate: Proportion of enrolled participants who complete the study.
4 and 8 weeks
Intervention acceptability
Time Frame: 4 and 8 weeks
Intervention acceptability will be assessed using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability questionnaire. Scores range from 7 to 35. Higher scores indicate better acceptability among participants.
4 and 8 weeks
Feasibility of intervention
Time Frame: 4 and 8 weeks
Will be assessed using the Feasibility of Intervention Measure questionnaire. Scores range from 4 to 20. Higher scores indicate better feasibility among participants.
4 and 8 weeks
Intervention appropriateness
Time Frame: 4 and 8 weeks
Will be assessed with the Intervention Appropriateness Measure questionnaire. Scores range from 4 to 20. Higher scores indicate better appropriateness among participants.
4 and 8 weeks
Facilitators, barriers, acceptability, satisfaction, and participant experiences with the the intervention
Time Frame: 4 and 8 weeks
Qualitative in-depth interviews
4 and 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fasting plasma glucose in mg/dl
Time Frame: 4 and 8 weeks
Will be analyzed by enzymatic assays
4 and 8 weeks
Alanine aminotransferase (liver enzyme) in U/L
Time Frame: 4 and 8 weeks
Will be analyzed with colorimetric assays
4 and 8 weeks
Weight in kg
Time Frame: 4 and 8 weeks
Weight will be measured using a digital weighing scale with an accuracy to the nearest 0.1 kg
4 and 8 weeks
Indices of ß-cell function
Time Frame: 4 and 8 weeks
Will be assessed using the insulinogenic index (IGI)
4 and 8 weeks
ß-cell function assessed by Oral Disposition Index (DI(O))
Time Frame: 4 and 8 weeks
Will be assessed using the Oral Disposition Index (DI(O))
4 and 8 weeks
ß-cell function assessed by Homeostatic Model Assessment of ß-cell Function (HOMA-B)
Time Frame: 4 and 8 weeks
Will be assessed using the Homeostatic Model Assessment of ß-cell Function (HOMA-B)
4 and 8 weeks
Indices of hepatic insulin resistance
Time Frame: 4 and 8 weeks
Will be assessed using the Hepatic Insulin Resistance Index (HIRI)
4 and 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sathish Thirunavukkarasu, PhD, Emory University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 31, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 10, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Isolated Impaired Fasting Glucose

Clinical Trials on Low-calorie diet

Subscribe