A Novel Vertical Y-shaped Tunnel Approach Versus Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel Technique, for The Treatment of Miller Class I Gingival Recession

June 10, 2024 updated by: Aslam Ashraf Mogahed, October 6 University

A Novel Vertical Y-shaped Tunnel Approach Versus Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel Technique, for The Treatment of Miller Class I Gingival Recession - Randomized Clinical Trial

Recent plastic procedures have provided satisfactory results in the treatment of gingival recession but there is, presently, a greater need for procedure that cause less surgical morbidity as also provide improved results. In this study we propose a novel vertical tunnel technique as a minimally invasive approach (Vertical Y-shaped Tunnel Approach) and evaluate clinical results in comparison to CAMT, both using CTG. The novel technique allows stability of the graft, maximum coronal vascularity and minimum soft tissue reflection.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The tunnel technique is an approach that optimizes esthetics and predictability because of its ability to avoid releasing critical papillae and maintaining a high level of vascularity at the surgical site to support the grafts. The tunnel technique has a minimally invasive nature since the interdental papillae are left intact and vertical incisions are not performed which results in better esthetics. This technique entailed the placement of a connective tissue graft in the tunnel. Complete graft coverage is not mandatory as long as the graft dimensions are sufficient to ensure its survival. Avoiding detachment of the highly fragile interdental soft tissue can minimize the risk of losing papilla height in critical esthetic areas, avoid scar formation, maximize the papillary and lateral blood supply to the underlying graft and better stabilize the graft for optimal wound healing Recent plastic procedures have provided satisfactory results in the treatment of gingival recession but there is, presently, a greater need for procedure that cause less surgical morbidity as also provide improved results. In this study we propose a novel vertical tunnel technique as a minimally invasive approach (Vertical Y-shaped Tunnel Approach) and evaluate clinical results in comparison to CAMT, both using CTG. The novel technique allows stability of the graft, maximum coronal vascularity and minimum soft tissue reflection.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Giza, Egypt
        • 6 October university

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age above 18 years old.
  2. The presence of Miller's class I gingival recession (25).
  3. Recession defect on maxillary incisors, maxillary and mandibular canines, or premolars.
  4. Absence of a history of periodontal surgery at the involved sites in the last 12 months.
  5. History of compliance with oral hygiene instructions and periodontal recall.
  6. Sufficient palatal donor tissue thickness (> 2mm).
  7. Clearly identifiable cemento-enamel-junction (CEJ)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with systemic illness known to affect the outcome of periodontal therapy, including diabetes, immune deficiencies, etc (26).
  2. Pregnant and lactating women
  3. Current use of any form of tobacco.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: root coverage using novel Y shaped Tunnel with Connective tissue graft
Sulcular incision will be performed using 15c blade . Micro-periosteal elevator will be used to elevate vertical full thickness tunnel starting coronally from the gingival sulcus and directed apically. Micro periosteal elevator will be used to elevate the buccal aspect of both mesial and distal papillae of the affected tooth. CTG will be prepared and inserted into the coronal tunnel aperture using blunt instrument to facilitate intrusion of graft into tunnel. CTG will be inserted into the tunnel up to the apical level leaving a coronal part to completely cover the recession defect. Finally single interrupted suture will be used to secure the coronal exposed part of the CTG followed by sling suture fixation of the gingival flap with that of CTG. The donor CTG will be stabilized to the underlying connective tissue interproximally using 5.0 sutures.
Sulcular incision followed by Micro-periosteal elevator will be used to elevate vertical full thickness tunnel starting coronally from the gingival sulcus and directed apically. CTG will be prepared and inserted into the coronal tunnel aperture using blunt instrument to facilitate intrusion of graft into tunnel. CTG insurted into the tunnel up to the apical level leaving a coronal part to completely cover the recession defect. Finally single interrupted suture will be used to secure the coronal exposed part of the CTG followed by sling suture fixation of the gingival flap with that of CTG. The donor CTG will be stabilized to the underlying connective tissue interproximally using 5.0 sutures.
Active Comparator: root coverage using MCAT with Connective tissue graft
The tunnel will be prepared with a full-thickness incision up to MGJ and as a split-thickness beyond MGJ using tunneling instruments to obtain a tension-free tunnel, allowing the insertion of the CTG, a delicate incision is performed at the level of interdental papillae and raised without detaching the tip of the papillae. The papillary regions will be detached in their buccal aspects. The adjacent papillae of the neighboring teeth will be involved in the preparation to ensure a coronal positioning of the flap. After planing, the graft will be inserted into the tunnel by a specific suture technique. The first suture will be inserted through the most distal recession part and the needle exits in the most medial part of the recession, second suture will be placed at the opposite side and the needle exits at the same medial recession. The buccal flap will be advanced coronally to cover CTG and secured with sling sutures. The donor CTG will stabilized to the underlying CT interproximally.
Sulcular incision followed by Micro-periosteal elevator will be used to elevate vertical full thickness tunnel starting coronally from the gingival sulcus and directed apically. CTG will be prepared and inserted into the coronal tunnel aperture using blunt instrument to facilitate intrusion of graft into tunnel. CTG insurted into the tunnel up to the apical level leaving a coronal part to completely cover the recession defect. Finally single interrupted suture will be used to secure the coronal exposed part of the CTG followed by sling suture fixation of the gingival flap with that of CTG. The donor CTG will be stabilized to the underlying connective tissue interproximally using 5.0 sutures.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
percentage of root coverage
Time Frame: 1 month, 3 and 6 months
Percentage root coverage (%RC): calculated as ([RD preoperative - RD postoperative]/RD preoperative) × 100%.
1 month, 3 and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complete root coverage (CRC)
Time Frame: 1 month, 3 and 6 months
The number of sites that resulted in 100% root coverage.
1 month, 3 and 6 months
Recession Depth (RD)
Time Frame: 1 month, 3 and 6 months
Measured in millimeters from the gingival margin at the midbuccal aspect of the root, to the CEJ or relative CEJ.
1 month, 3 and 6 months
Recession width (RW)
Time Frame: 1 month, 3 and 6 months
The horizontal distance between the bilateral gingival margins at the height of the CEJ. (mm)
1 month, 3 and 6 months
Probing depth (PD)
Time Frame: 6 months
Measured in millimeters from the gingival margin to the base of the periodontal sulcus at 6 sites per tooth. (baseline and after 6 months)
6 months
Clinical attachment level (CAL)
Time Frame: 6 months
Measured in millimeters from CEJ or relative CEJ to the base of the periodontal sulcus at 6 sites per tooth. (after 6 months)
6 months
Width of the keratinized tissue (KTW)
Time Frame: 1 month, 3 and 6 months
Measured in millimeters at midbuccal aspect of the tooth from the gingival margin to the mucogingival junction.
1 month, 3 and 6 months
Gingival Thickness (GT)
Time Frame: 6 months
Measured in millimeters at the mid-buccal of the gingiva and 2 mm apical the gingival margin at the attached gingiva or the alveolar mucosa using a #15 endodontic reamer with a silicon disk stop.
6 months
Plaque index (PI)
Time Frame: 1 month, 3 and 6 months
Is used for estimating the status of oral hygiene by measuring dental plaque that occurs in the areas adjacent to the gingival margin.
1 month, 3 and 6 months
Gingival index (GI)
Time Frame: 1 month, 3 and 6 months
GI is measured according to Loe and Sillness and scored on a scale of 0 to 3.
1 month, 3 and 6 months
Pain index (PN)
Time Frame: 1 month, 3 and 6 months
Pain is recorded on a horizontal pain scale of 0-10, Pain index to be recorded by the patients at 9 am, 3pm, and 9 pm from the day of the surgery and for 3 weeks post-treatment.
1 month, 3 and 6 months
Professional esthetic evaluation and patient-reported satisfaction
Time Frame: 6 months

The esthetic outcome will be assessed post-operatively after 6 months by an independent second examiner (MS), who is blinded to the treatment assignment, in accordance with RES (30). The evaluation will be based on comparing digital photographs.

Five variables were assessed:

  1. the level of gingival margin (GM);
  2. marginal tissue contour (MTC);
  3. soft tissue texture (STT);
  4. muco-gingival junction alignment (MGJ); and
  5. gingival color (GC). A score of 0, 3, or 6 will be used for evaluation of GM, whereas a score of 0-1 will be used for each of the other variables. The ideal esthetic score will be 10.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aslam Ashraf Mogahed, BDs, O6U

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 2, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 4, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

February 4, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 7, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gingival Recession

Clinical Trials on Y shaped Tunnel with Connective tissue graft

Subscribe