Effectiveness of Experiential Fibrowalk Therapy (EFW)

Effectiveness of Experiential Fibrowalk Therapy for Fibromyalgia Based on Pain Science Education, Exercise Therapy, Psychological Support, and Nature Exposure: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

The present project will evaluate through a randomised controlled clinical trial with 4-month follow-up, the efficacy in clinical symptoms and quality of life (3-month time horizon) of the multicomponent EXPERIENTIAL FIBROWALK programme in treating individuals diagnosed with fibromyalgia, in compare with original Fibrowalk and virtual Fibrowalk. Pre-post changes will be evaluated in various variables under investigation, will include kinesiophobia, physical function, anxiety, depression, physical dysfunction, overall impact, and symptom intensity.

The design of the present study with 3 treatment branches:

Condition or disease Fibromyalgia Intervention/treatment Behavioral: TAU + Experiential Fibrowalk Behavioral: TAU + Fibrowalk Behavioral: TAU + virtual

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The objective of the Experiential Fibrolwalk study is to determine the clinical effectiveness of a new treatment protocol for individuals with fibromyalgia. This protocol was developed by identifying predictors of poor response and through collaboration between physiotherapists, clinical psychologists, and patients. The objectives of this 4-month controlled clinical trial are twofold. Firstly, it aims to assess the impact of a protocol developed collaboratively by clinical therapists and users on the quality of life of individuals with fibromyalgia. Secondly, it aims to determine the pre-post changes in kinesiophobia, physical function, anxiety, depression, physical dysfunction, overall impact, and symptom intensity. Methods and analysis: The study will involve 120 fibromyalgia patients recruited from the Central Sensitivity Syndromes Specialized Unit at Vall d'Hebron Hospital's Rheumatology Service, who will be randomly assigned to one of three study groups: TAU + Experiential Fibrowalk, TAU + Fibrowalk, TAU + virtual. A comprehensive assessment to collect functional impact, depressive-anxiety symptoms, physical function, fatigue, kinesiophobia, pain catastrophism, impression of change,quality of life variables will be conducted pre-intervention, at half of the intervention (6 weeks), post-intervention (12 weeks), and at 3-month follow-up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Barcelona, Spain, 08035
        • Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults from 18 to 75 years-old.
  • 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria + the 2011 modified ACR diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia
  • Able to understand Spanish and accept to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participating in concurrent or past RCTs (previous year).
  • Comorbidity with severe mental disorders (i.e. psychosis) or neurodegenerative diseases (i.e. Alzheimer) that that would limit the ability of the patient to participate in the RCT.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experiential FW
Group treatment protocol of 12 weekly 120 minute sessions (outdoor intervention) based in no-responder predictive analysis and co-creating process
Traditional Fibrowalk based on Pain Science Education (30 min.) - Cognitive restructuring (30 min.) - Mindfulness techniques (30 min.) - Physical exercise in a natural environment / nature exposure (30 min.) carried out experientially.
Active Comparator: Traditional FW
Group treatment protocol of 12 weekly 120 minute sessions (outdoor intervention)
Traditional Fibrowalk based on Pain Science Education (30 min.) - Cognitive restructuring (30 min.) - Mindfulness techniques (30 min.) - Physical exercise in a natural environment / nature exposure (30 min.)
Active Comparator: Online FW
Group treatment protocol of 12 weekly 60 minute sessions (virtual intervention)
Traditional Fibrowalk based on Pain Science Education (30 min.) - Cognitive restructuring (30 min.) - Mindfulness techniques (30 min.) - Physical exercise in a natural environment / nature exposure (30 min.) performed virtually.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR)
Time Frame: Change from baseline values at 3 months
Standard pharmacological treatment usually provided to patients with fibromyalgia. The FIQR comprises three dimensions: physical dysfunction (scores from 0 to 30), overall impact (scores from 0 to 20), and intensity of the symptoms (scores from 0 to 50) is used to measure the impact generated by FM during the last week. It consists of 21 items, which are answered on a numerical rating scale of 11 points (from 0 to 10). Total scores can range from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting greater deterioration.
Change from baseline values at 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline values at 3 months
HADS is used to quantify the severity of anxiety and depression symptoms. It consists of two dimensions (anxiety and depression) of 7 items each responding on a Likert scale of 4 points. Total scores of each scale (HADS-A and HADSD) range from 0 to 21, where higher scores indicate greater severity of symptoms
Change from baseline values at 3 months
Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Time Frame: Change from baseline values at 3 months
Physical Function of the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) was used to measure physical function. This dimension comprises a total of 10 items, which are answered on a Likert scale of 3 points. Total scores on each scale are then transformed and can range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicate better physical function.
Change from baseline values at 3 months
Tampa Scale for kinesiophobia (TSK-11)
Time Frame: Change from baseline values at 3 months
TSK-11 is used to assess fear of pain and movement. It consists of 11 items, which are answered on a Likert scale of 4 points. Total scores of each scale range from 11 to 44, where higher scores indicate a greater fear of pain and Movement.
Change from baseline values at 3 months
Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI)
Time Frame: Change from baseline values at 3 months
Change from baseline values at 6 months] MFI is used to evaluate five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, and mental fatigue. Its consists in a 20-item scale designed. Participants utilize a 7-point scale to express the extent to which specific statements accurately reflect their fatigue experiences. Several positively phrased items are reverse-scored. Greater overall scores indicate higher levels of fatigue severity.
Change from baseline values at 3 months
Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline values at 3 months
PCS is used to evaluate catastrophic thoughts associated with pain. It consists of three dimensions (rumination, magnification, and helplessness) of 13 items in total, which are answered on a Likert scale of 5 points. Total scores on each scale range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating more catastrophic thoughts
Change from baseline values at 3 months
Psychological inflexibility in pain scale (PIPS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline values at 3 months
A 12-item scale that assesses psychological inflexibility in pain patients and includes two factors: avoidance and cognitive fusion with pain. Respondents are asked to rate items on a 7-point scale that ranges from 1 (never true) to 7 (always true). Higher scores indicate greater levels of psychological inflexibility.
Change from baseline values at 3 months
The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Time Frame: Change from baseline values at 3 months
Is a measure that has been frequently used as indicators of meaningful overall change [on a 7-point Likert scale, from 1 = "Much better" to 7 = "Much worse"] in treatments for chronic pain.
Change from baseline values at 3 months
Pain Specific Impression of Change (PSIC)
Time Frame: Change from baseline values at 3 months
The PSIC asks about the impression of change in more specific domains than PGIC: physical and social functioning, work-related activities, mood, and pain [on a 7-point Likert scale, from 1 = "Much better" to 7 = "Much worse"].
Change from baseline values at 3 months
Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ) (Adapted version)
Time Frame: Change from baseline values at 3 months
This is a 6-item test used to assess treatment expectations (3 items) as well as credibility (3 items). After the treatment, the test is administered with the questions reformulated in the past tense.
Change from baseline values at 3 months
Adverse effects of treatments
Time Frame: Change from baseline values at 3 months
Ad hoc measure to check for the presence of negative effects of psychological treatments.
Change from baseline values at 3 months
Socio-demographic questionnaire
Time Frame: Change from baseline values at 3 months
Gender, date of birth, marital status, living arrangements, educational level and employment status.
Change from baseline values at 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Albert Feliu, PhD, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 9, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 9, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 13, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fibromyalgia

Clinical Trials on Experiential FW

Subscribe