How Does Implementing a GetUp Assist Device in Addition to a Daily Low-intensity Functional or Traditional Training Program Affect Norwegian Female Office Workers' Physical Health After 12 Weeks?

February 22, 2026 updated by: Lasse Engberg Treu Lassen, Aalborg University

Effects of Low-Intensity Office Training and Standing Work on Health and Functional Performance Among Female Computer Users: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial

This study aims to quantify the effect of daily transition routines between sitting and standing behaviour with an additional daily low-intensity traditional or functional training program on the physical health of sedentary Norwegian female workers after 12 weeks of implementation into their working environment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

58

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Nord-Trøndelag
      • Steinkjer, Nord-Trøndelag, Norway, 7711
        • SSA Steinkjer

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Females are included in this study due to the approximately twice-high prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders.
  • No experience with office fit training or participation in an ongoing similar training intervention is allowed.
  • Working more than 6 hours a day at a computer workstation
  • Physical inactivity (less than two sessions or bouts of exercise totalling 30 minutes/week).
  • Musculoskeletal complaints are accepted as long as the pain is not a restricting factor. when performing the testing and training intervention exercises.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants not able to perform the testing battery.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Negative control
Control group. A group that is not treated.
Experimental: Functional training group
Functional training group that will perform a short, low-intensity, 10-minute hole-body exercise program per day before the lunch break, in addition to following the getup assistance during the working day.
How does implementing a GetUp Assist device in addition to a daily low-intensity functional or traditional training program affect Norwegian female office workers' physical health after 12 weeks?
Active Comparator: Traditional training group
Traditional training group that will perform a short, low-intensity, 10-minute hole-body exercise program per day before the lunch break, in addition to following the getup assistance during the working day.
How does implementing a GetUp Assist device in addition to a daily low-intensity functional or traditional training program affect Norwegian female office workers' physical health after 12 weeks?

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Norwegian Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Time Frame: 3 months
Measure (i) physical function, (ii) Energy/fatigue, (iii) pain, and (iv) general health
3 months
Neck and shoulder trouble questionnaire from the Nordic musculoskeletal questionnaire
Time Frame: 3 months
Measure neck-shoulder discomfort
3 months
Numeric rating scale
Time Frame: 3 months
Measure neck-shoulder discomfort from 0-10 scale, with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable
3 months
Y-balance test
Time Frame: 3 months
Quantify dynamic postural control
3 months
The Danish step test
Time Frame: 3 months
Estimating cardiorespiratory fitness
3 months
Chair-sit-and-reach test
Time Frame: 3 months
Measuring hamstrings flexibility
3 months
Back scratch test
Time Frame: 3 months
Measuring upper-body/ shoulder flexibility
3 months
CS-30 test
Time Frame: 3 months
Measuring lower-body strength
3 months
Hand Grip Strength test
Time Frame: 3 months
Measuring hand Grip Strength
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 2, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 22, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 22, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 8, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 17, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 24, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 438957

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neck, Shoulder and Arm Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Experimental, comparator and control

Subscribe