tDCS and Lower Limb Performance in Stroke

March 19, 2025 updated by: Riphah International University

Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Lower Limb Performance in Stroke Patients

Lower limb rehabilitation is especially important, as the simple act of regaining the ability to walk has subsequent effects on the ability to engage in activities of daily living .So, this study will contribute in describing the management of lower limb motor recovery along with the therapeutic intervention (MRP) with tDCS (anodal stimulation). This study aims to address some of the drawbacks observed in previous studies like allocation concealment, small sample size due to drop outs, short term effects of tDCS and experimental designs as well.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) appears to be an intriguing adjuvant for stroke neurorehabilitation, though there are many other methods available. Depending on the polarity used, tDCS alters cortical excitability when electrodes applied over the motor cortex area (M1) to be stimulated, and the cathode above the contralateral eye (Orbital area), tDCS (thus termed anodal) increases cortical excitability. It is easy to use, safe and has minimal side effects like a sensation of itching, post-stimulation headache and sometimes mild nausea may experience. Numerous research indicates that cortical activity rises in conjunction with gait. According to a number of studies, corticospinal neuron activity either parallels or possibly even partially regulates the activity of spinal motor neurons during walking. There exist various techniques for implementing transcranial direct current stimulation in conjunction with multiple supplementary therapies.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punjab
      • Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan
        • Pakistan Railway General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Stroke for more than 6 months.
  • National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) for severity level (Mild (1-4), Moderate (5-15), Moderate to Severe (16-20), Severe (21-42)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Epilepsy
  • Scalp injury/ skin lesion e.g. psoriasis or eczema etc.
  • Patient with lower limb amputation or any MSK/neurological disorder that limit the LE function
  • Implanted medical devices including intracranial electrodes, surgical clips, shrapnel or a pacemaker

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: tDCS Group

Electrode placement: Anodal electrode placed over primary motor cortex area (M1) while the cathode placed over contralateral orbit.

Duration of 20 minutes with intensity of 2mA, ramping up and down at 8 seconds. the density of 0.07 C/cm2 for 3 days/week for 8 weeks

active anodal tDCS
Sham Comparator: Sham Group

Electrode placement: Anodal electrode placed over primary motor cortex area (M1) while the cathode placed over contralateral orbit.

Duration of 20 minutes with intensity of 0.5mA, ramping up and down at 150 and 30 seconds respectively. There will be brief stimulation period of 3-5% active session duration the density of 0.07 C/cm2 for 3 days/week for 8 weeks

sham anodal tDCS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
FMA-lower extremity
Time Frame: 8 week
FMA-LE is a method used to measure motor function, balance, and function of joints in post-stroke patients. Fugl Meyer Assessment of Lower Extremity (FMA-LE). FMA-LE is a method used to evaluate the performance of motor movement on the lower limbs (hips, knees, feet, and ankles) and predicts recovery function of motion in stroke patients. FMA-LE method consists of 17 items are organized into several sub-sections, namely reflection part, synergistic part, and coordination with Mild (˃45),Moderate (30-45),Severe (˂30) scores(12). It shows sensitivity of 0.87 and specificity of 0.81
8 week
Six Minute walk Test
Time Frame: 8 week
The Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) is a functional walking test in which the distance that a stroke patient can walk within six minutes is evaluated. This test has been used to assess individuals with stroke, head injury and Parkinson's disease. There are no actual items to the 6MWT.It is a simple test that requires a 100-ft, quiet, indoor, flat, straight rectangular hallway. The walking course must be 30m in length. The length of the 30m corridor must be marked by colored tape at every 3m. The turnaround must be marked with a cone. Some studies have used 20 and 50m corridors. It has excellent test-retest reliability (0.99 distance in meters) among stroke survivors
8 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stroke Specific Quality of Life
Time Frame: 8 week
The Stroke Specific Quality Of Life scale (SS-QOL) is a patient-centered outcome measure intended to provide an assessment of health-related quality of life specific to patients with stroke. It is a self-report scale containing 49 items in 12 domains including Energy, Mobility, Upper extremity function, Work/productivity, Mood, Self-care, Social roles, Family roles, Vision, Language, Thinking, and Personality. Score ranges from 49 to 245. Higher scores indicate better QOL(14).It has a sensitivity of 70.0% and a specificity of 75.8%
8 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mirza Obaid Baig, MSPT, Riphah International University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on tDCS

Subscribe