Feasibility and Added Value of the TRACMOTION Device for ESD (TRACMOTION)

August 27, 2024 updated by: Arjun D. Koch, MD, PhD, Erasmus Medical Center

A single center non-randomized prospective clinical study, to evaluate the feasibility and added value of the CE-certified Tracmotion device in patients scheduled consecutively for ESD in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract.

After ESD, the endoscopists' opinion will be evaluated with a short questionnaire on experience with the Tracmotion device. The pathology report will be checked for radicality and microscopic damage of the removed lesion.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Objective: The purpose of this study is to establish feasibility of the Tracmotion device for ESD and to define its added value during ESD in both upper and lower GI procedures, both in antegrade and in retroflex positions.

Study design: Single center prospective observational non-randomized clinical study.

Study population: A total of 20 consecutive cases scheduled for ESD will be included. Sample size calculation does not apply for this type of study. Patients already scheduled for ESD will undergo an ESD procedure as planned with the aid of the Tracmotion device. It is anticipated that the Tracmotion will provide superior traction and counter traction compared to off-label tools.

Intervention: Patients already scheduled for ESD will undergo an ESD procedure with the aid of the Tracmotion device.

Main study parameters/endpoints:

Feasibility: procedure time, dissection speed, lesional damage (tearing or grasping injury to the mucosa on macroscopy and pathological review) Added value: subjective evaluation of the Tracmotion device by the performing endoscopist (contentment of use of Tracmotion, difference in procedure time, stability of, control of and accessibility to the lesion).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients scheduled for endoscopic submucosal dissection (upper and lower gastrointestinal tract);
  • Lesion is accessible with a therapeutic endoscope;
  • Written informed consent;
  • Age ≥18 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Coagulopathy (not corrected prior to endoscopic submucosal dissection);
  • Participating in a different experimental drug/device trial in the previous 3 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: ESD with TRACMOTION
Patients already scheduled for ESD will undergo an ESD procedure with the aid of the TRACMOTION device.
Patients already scheduled for ESD will undergo an ESD procedure with the aid of the Tracmotion device

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Procedure time
Time Frame: During endoscopic submucosal dissection procedure
Procedure time of the endoscopic submucosal dissection will be measured from start incision to end incision (in minutes)
During endoscopic submucosal dissection procedure
Dissection speed
Time Frame: During endoscopic submucosal dissection procedure
Dissection speed of ESD will be measured from start incision to end incision (square millimeter of dissected tissue per minute)
During endoscopic submucosal dissection procedure
Lesional damage
Time Frame: During endoscopic submucosal dissection and during pathology review (on average 2 weeks after endoscopic submucosal dissection)
Any tearing or grasping injury to the mucosa on macroscopy (yes vs. no) observed by the endoscopist and at pathological review (yes/no) observed by the pathologist expressed in percentages (%).
During endoscopic submucosal dissection and during pathology review (on average 2 weeks after endoscopic submucosal dissection)
Subjective evaluation of the added value of the TRACMOTION device
Time Frame: Immediately after endoscopic submucosal dissection
Directly after the endoscopic mucosal dissection the endoscopist will fill in a questionnaire using the Likert scale (1= worst experience possible, 5 = best experience possible) about their experience with the TRACMOTION device during ESD (overall contentment, difference of procedure time, stability of, control of and accessibility to the lesion that was resected)
Immediately after endoscopic submucosal dissection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
En-bloc rate
Time Frame: Determined Immediately after endoscopic submucosal dissection
The incidence of en-bloc resections in percentages (%)
Determined Immediately after endoscopic submucosal dissection
R0 rate
Time Frame: Determined during the pathology review (on average 2 weeks after endoscopic submucosal dissection)
The incidence of R0 resections in percentages (%)
Determined during the pathology review (on average 2 weeks after endoscopic submucosal dissection)
Complications after during and after endoscopic submucosal dissection
Time Frame: During endoscopic submucosal dissection procedure and 2 weeks after
Complications will be measured during and after endoscopic submucosal dissection (bleeding yes/no, perforation yes/no) and will be expressed as percentages (%)
During endoscopic submucosal dissection procedure and 2 weeks after

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Age
Time Frame: At baseline (after informed consent is signed)
Age in years
At baseline (after informed consent is signed)
Gender
Time Frame: At baseline (after informed consent is signed)
Gender (male/female)
At baseline (after informed consent is signed)
Tumor length
Time Frame: During endoscopic submucosal dissection, before incision starts
Tumor length in millimeter (mm)
During endoscopic submucosal dissection, before incision starts
Tumor location
Time Frame: During endoscopic submucosal dissection, before incision starts
Tumor location in centimeter (cm) measured from incisors
During endoscopic submucosal dissection, before incision starts
Tumor histology
Time Frame: After endoscopic submucosal dissection when the pathologist has reviewed the tissue (on average 2 weeks after endoscopic submucosal dissection)
Tumor histology conform the pathology review
After endoscopic submucosal dissection when the pathologist has reviewed the tissue (on average 2 weeks after endoscopic submucosal dissection)
Prior treatment
Time Frame: At baseline (after informed consent is signed)
Prior treatment of oesophageal neoplasms (such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy)
At baseline (after informed consent is signed)
Use of symptomatic medication
Time Frame: 2 weeks after endoscopic submucosal dissection
Use of symptomatic medication during 2 weeks after endoscopic submucosal dissection (analgesics, antiemetics, proton pump inhibitors)
2 weeks after endoscopic submucosal dissection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 11, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 21, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Oesophageal Neoplasm

Subscribe