Gastrointestinal Functional Outcome Ivor Lewis

December 11, 2023 updated by: University Hospitals, Leicester

Functional Outcome Following Ivor-Lewis Oesophagectomy

This study focuses on the prevalence of functional complications and their impact on QOL in patients who underwent an Ivor Lewis Oesophagectomy.

This study will assess the prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms and QOL from beyond the first year following surgery up to 5 years. The aim is to determine whether gastrointestinal side effects and QOL are compromised in the long-term.

This study will also explore in details, the impact of surgery on their quality of life and gastro intestinal symptoms that patients has experienced post operatively.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Oesophago-gastric (OG) cancer is the fifth most common malignancy in the United Kingdom, affecting approximately 16,000 people each year. Although surgery offers the best prospect for potential cure of OG cancers, radical treatment may result in increased treatment relate mortality, high treatment-induced morbidity, and reduced quality of life. Traditionally, many centres managing OG cancers focused on mortality and morbidity as their key outcome measures. However, a growing body of opinion considers that a measure of broader effects of ill health and treatment on the patients quality of life (QOL) is necessary. Such considerations are important as it is questionable if patients are subjected to treatment merely to offer them a few extra months of life, particularly if this is at the expense of quality of life. These includes physical, functional, social and physiological aspects of life.

More than half of the operated patients will develop significant functional disorder after surgery affecting QOL. The most common problems observed are dysphagia, dumping syndrome, delayed gastric emptying, and reflux. These functional disorder are not always detected immediately post operatively, but may become more troublesome as time goes by.

The purpose of this study is

  • to evaluate mid to long term HRQL in patients that underwent Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (ILE) with gastric pull-up in Royal Leicester Infirmary with minimum of 12 months follow up and up to 5 years.
  • to identify clinical factors influencing quality of life post operatively.
  • explore patients' experiences of their quality of life and how they handle their new life situation from a long-term perspective after oesophagectomy The outcome of this study would benefit both surgeons and patients in terms of pre-operative counselling and planning.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

75

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Leicester, United Kingdom, LE1 5WW
        • Leicester Royal Infirmary

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patient who underwent Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy with lymphadenectomy for oesophageal cancer will be selected from our database at the Department of Surgery, Leicester Royal Infirmary. These include patients from Leicestershire and Northamptonshire treated at the Leicester Royal Infirmary. Mid to long term survivors operated in our institution with a follow up of at least 12 months will be identified from our database to be included in our study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who underwent Ivor Lewis Oesophagectomy in Leicester Royal Infirmary with minimum follow up of 12 months.
  • Age more than 18

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Disease recurrence within the follow up period
  • Age less than 18

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quantitative Assessment using EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0)
Time Frame: Beyond 12 months up to 5 years

The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale.

All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.

Thus a high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL,but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems.

Beyond 12 months up to 5 years
Quantitative Assessment using EORTC QLQ-OES-24
Time Frame: Beyond 12 months up to 5 years

EORTC QLQ-OES-24 is a 24-item esophageal cancer-specific questionnaire supplementing EORTC QLQ-C30 with information about disease and treatment-related symptoms and side effects, dysphagia, nutrition, and social and emotional effects of esophageal cancer.

Scale scores will be calculated by averaging items within scales and transforming average scores linearly. All of the scales range in score from 0 to 100. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning whereas a high score for a symptom scale or item represents a high level of symptomatology or problems

Beyond 12 months up to 5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Qualitative analysis
Time Frame: Beyond 12 months up to 5 years
Interviews will be conducted with up to 15 participants and their carers and qualitative analysis of interviews will be performed
Beyond 12 months up to 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: DAVID J BOWREY, MD, University Hospitals, Leicester

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 3, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 13, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 3, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

September 5, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 12, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EDGE ID 107692

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Oesophageal Cancer

Clinical Trials on Ivor Lewis Oesophagectomy

3
Subscribe