Submaximal Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing for Detection of Myocardial Injury After Noncardiac Surgery (EnhanceMINS)

May 18, 2026 updated by: Yale University

Enhancing Precise Perioperative Risk Surveillance: Validation of Submaximal Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing to Usual Care for Detection of Myocardial Injury After Noncardiac Surgery

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether physicians can associate evidence of myocardial injury after surgery with findings obtained from submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing. The main questions are:

Is detection of postoperative myocardial injury with submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing superior to using usual care?

And which submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing measure is better?

Participants will undergo evaluation with a short submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise test, then undergo surgery. Myocardial injury will be measured on postoperative days 0, 1, 2, and 3 (during and up to 3 days after surgery). These results will analyzed by comparing it to findings from the submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise test.

If there is a relationship, this will help anesthesiologists and surgeons assign certain treatments that may reduce the risk of developing myocardial injury after surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Among the 50 million US adults undergo non-cardiac surgery each year, an estimated 1.4-3.9% of patients experience perioperative myocardial infarction with another 6-18% showing evidence of myocardial injury. These cardiac insults, known as myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS) are associated with a 2.7-3.2 fold higher odds of 30-day mortality, 2.2 fold higher odds of nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), 1.55 fold increase in 30-day congestive heart failure events, and 5.2 times higher risk of stroke, highlighting the importance of predicting and treating their occurrence. MINS is treatable, and potentially preventable, by a combination of tailored intraoperative monitoring and appropriate post-operative care.

The current approach to preoperative risk stratification is predominately derived from patient-reported functional capacity associated with history, physical examination and select laboratory investigations. This approach results in significant healthcare worker time and cost expenditures, without improved perioperative outcomes. In contrast, a technological approach utilizing conventional cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) has been shown to improve individualized identification of high-risk patients prior to surgery. Widespread cardiopulmonary exercise test adoption in the perioperative setting, however, has been limited by cost, technical requirements, and time investment despite its documented utility in cardiopulmonary risk assessment. However, brief submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (smCPET) addresses the limitations of conventional CPET including low cost, low time investment, small footprint, and ease of operator efficiency. In our pilot (under review), we demonstrated the feasibility and performance of implementing smCPET within a high-volume pre-surgical evaluation clinic.

This proposal seeks to continue work in characterizing smCPET and its role in individualized preoperative risk identification. The aim of this study proposal is to validate two clinically relevant questions: 1) Are smCPET measures superior to usual care (Duke Activity Status Index) in patients undergoing moderate to high-risk noncardiac surgery and 2) to determine which smCPET measure is more sensitive to MINS as described by abnormalities in postoperative high-sensitivity troponin measurements.

Using a smCPET-guided approach, this study seeks to characterize its value in identifying high-risk patients for MINS, provide further validation of smCPET utility as a preoperative risk stratification approach, and preliminarily identify smCPET measures with highest association with MINS.

If validated, this would provide the foundation for a smCPET-guided clinical decision support system of preoperative identification and perioperative monitoring that could 1) enhance patient outcomes by providing early prediction and detection of MINS and 2) characterize a research methodology to stratify participants for further research in assessing perioperative strategies to reduce MINS. These findings will provide one of the first examples of quantitative and individualized preoperative risk identification methods for a common and deleterious perioperative outcome.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06510
        • Yale University; Yale New Haven Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Provision of signed and dated informed consent form.
  2. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study.
  3. Biological male or female, aged 45 years or older.
  4. In good general health as evidenced by medical history or diagnosed with metabolic equivalents (self-reported ability to climb 1 flight of stairs).
  5. Revised Cardiac Risk Index less than or equal to three.
  6. Willing to accept phlebotomy on operative day 0, 1, 2, and 3, as part of usual care.
  7. Scheduled for moderate to high-risk elective non-cardiac surgery with an expected 24-72 hour stay within 60 days of enrollment in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability to perform study procedures as defined by inability to achieve greater than 4 metabolic equivalents (cannot climb 1 flight of stairs reliably).
  2. Pregnancy or lactation.
  3. Inability to give independent informed consent.
  4. Revised cardiac risk index greater than 3.
  5. Recent myocardial infarction (less than 6 weeks).
  6. Recent anginal symptoms (stable or unstable) within past 6 months.
  7. Recent admission or endorsement for congestive heart failure within 6 months
  8. Recent admission or endorsement for syncope within 6 months.
  9. Symptomatic tachy- or bradyarrhythmia (supraventricular tachcardia, ventricular tachycardia with symptoms of intermittent dizziness, pre- syncopal events)
  10. Uncorrected severe valvular heart disease (severe aortic, tricuspid or mitral stenosis)
  11. Acute pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis (within past 6 months)
  12. Uncontrolled pulmonary edema
  13. Uncontrolled symptomatic cardiac arrhythmias.
  14. Active endocarditis
  15. Active myocarditis or pericarditis
  16. Active wheezing or recent exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease admission in past 6 months.
  17. Inability to perform components of the SHAPE test (severe hip flexion limitation, severe osteoarthritis of knee or hip, limb immobilization, ambulation requires cane or crutches, baseline balance irregularities.
  18. Diagnosis of symptomatic vertigo
  19. Known allergic reactions to components of the SHAPE medical system apparatus disposable mouthpiece.
  20. Active enrollment in an interventional clinical trial within the enrollment period of the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing
Single arm design; selected participants will receive both usual care (Duke Activity Status Index) and submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing. All participants will receive high-sensitivity troponin measurements on operative day 1 and postoperative day 1,2,3
A serum derived measure of myocardial injury. Threshold value of 14ng/L.
Other Names:
  • HST
FDA-approved device uses breath by breath sampling during calibration and exercise challenge. Analysis is performed using a differential pressure pneumotach method for volume calibration and measurement, an infrared sensor for CO2 and a paramagnetic sensor for O2 measurements. Automated calibration using a calibration gas mixture (15.6% O2/5% CO2) is performed at regular intervals. The Shape II calculations used to differentiate causes of exertional dyspnea are Artificial Intelligence (AI) based algorithms and measurements have been previously validated to conventional cardiopulmonary exercise testing methods. Brief smCPET is comprised of a 2-minute calibration phase, 3 minutes of graded exercise using a stair-step and a 1 minute recovery phase for a total of 6 minutes. An instant report is then generated.
Other Names:
  • smCPET
A validated measure of preoperative functional capacity which will be utilized to cross-validate smCPET peak VO2. Low DASI score has been found to estimate peak oxygen uptake (VO2), predict MINS, myocardial infarction, and inducible myocardial ischemia on myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.
Other Names:
  • DASI

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MINS
Time Frame: Operative Day 0, Postoperative Day 1, 2 or 3
Myocardial Injury after noncardiac surgery. Measurement: High-Sensitivity Troponin assay with an abnormal value defined as 14 nanograms per liter or greater.
Operative Day 0, Postoperative Day 1, 2 or 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
30-day Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events
Time Frame: Postoperative Day 1 through Postoperative Day 30
30-day recorded events of atrial fibrillation, angina, stroke, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure as defined by International Classification of Disease (Version 10) coding.
Postoperative Day 1 through Postoperative Day 30
Length of Stay
Time Frame: From operative day 0 through hospital discharge up to postoperative day 180
Measurement of patient inpatient status from operative day 0 through physical discharge from the hospital.
From operative day 0 through hospital discharge up to postoperative day 180
Readmission
Time Frame: Postoperative Day One through Postoperative Day 60.
Readmission of any type from the time of surgical procedure discharge through postoperative day 60.
Postoperative Day One through Postoperative Day 60.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Zyad J Carr, M.D., Yale University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 30, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 14, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The study protocol, statistical analysis plan, informed consent and human study record will be provided. A deidentified dataset will be uploaded to the data sharing repository NIBIB physionet website.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

For 24 months after initial study publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

CITI trained certified individuals that meet criteria set forth by physionet.org.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Preoperative Period

Clinical Trials on High-sensitivity troponin, serum

Subscribe