Regional Assessment of the Risk of Lung Injury in Ventilated Patients (RLY)

June 26, 2024 updated by: Nestor Pistillo, Hospital El Cruce

Regional Assessment of the Risk of Lung Injury in Ventilated Patients With Similar Lung Load

Specific characteristics of the lung, such as its functional capacity, heterogeneity, and recruitment potential, can influence the development of ventilator-induced lung injury even under safe ventilation conditions. Objective: To evaluate the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury at the regional level in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome ventilated with similar tidal volumes and inspiratory pressures.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Mechanical ventilation constitutes a crucial resource serving as a bridge to pulmonary recovery in acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, like any medical intervention, it carries risks of adverse effects, both at the pulmonary and systemic levels. Mechanisms involved in the development of ventilator-induced lung injury include excessive stretching and deformation of lung tissues (stress/strain), cyclic opening and closing of alveoli causing shear stress (atelectrauma injury), and the resulting biological response to tissue damage (biotrauma).

To prevent and/or minimize the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury, monitoring of ventilatory mechanics seeks to understand the effects of the ventilatory cycle on the diseased lung. Factors such as tidal volume, plateau pressure, driving pressure, inspiratory flow, respiratory rate, excessive inspiratory effort, and occasionally positive end-expiratory pressure have been directly associated with the mechanism of damage. From an integrative perspective, the concept of mechanical power seeks to encompass most of these factors within a measurable unit thus expressing the energy repeatedly applied to the respiratory system over a unit of time. Mechanical power provides a more comprehensive view of the burden imposed on the lung and can assist in the identification and management of potential risks associated with mechanical ventilation.

However, mechanical power is not the only factor involved in the development of VILI, as factors such as the duration of mechanical ventilation and the conditions specific to the diseased lung also play a role.ventilator-induced lung injury results from the relationship between the load imposed by the ventilator and the inability of the lung parenchyma to tolerate it. Factors such as reduced lung functional capacity, heterogeneity of aeration loss, and instability of collapsed alveoli, among others, can modulate the lung's tolerance to mechanical injury and influence the development of ventilator-induced lung injury . Finally, different regional lung conditions may give rise to the coexistence of different injury mechanisms in the same lung.

Objective: To evaluate different mechanisms of ventilator-induced lung injury at the regional level in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome ventilated in the supine position with similar lung load.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

10

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring mechanical ventilatory assistanc

Description

Inclusion Criteria: ARDS patients

-

Exclusion Criteria:Patients with any of the following criteria were excluded:

  • History of emphysema, asthma, pneumothorax, or active bronchopulmonary fistula.
  • Severe instability at the time of the study defined by at least one of the following indicators: SaO2 ≤ 90%, shock requiring > 0.5 γ/kg/min of noradrenaline, complex arrhythmia, myocardial ischemia, intracranial hypertension refractory despite first-line measures.
  • Esophageal pathology contraindicating esophageal balloon placement (esophageal varices, stenosis, trauma or esophageal surgery, tumor) and/or hematemesis.
  • Severe coagulopathy (platelet count <20,000/mm3 or INR >4.
  • Inability to undergo computed tomography: morbid obesity (>170 kg) or abdominal circumference >200 cm.
  • Patients with do-not-resuscitate orders and pregnant women.
  • Participation in another research study in the last 30 days.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
ventral

Ventral half of the lung

..

Patients were ventilated under similar tidal volume, respiratory rate, and plateau pressure. PEEP was the adjustment variable to reach a similar plateau pressure
Dorsal
Dorsal half of the lung
Patients were ventilated under similar tidal volume, respiratory rate, and plateau pressure. PEEP was the adjustment variable to reach a similar plateau pressure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
comparison of regional lung volume
Time Frame: 1 hour
comparison of regional lung volume in ml
1 hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
comparison of regional volume of hyperinflated lung
Time Frame: 1 hour
comparison of regional volume of hyperinflated lung in ml
1 hour
comparison of regional lung deformation
Time Frame: 1 hour
comparison of regional lung deformation in percentage
1 hour
comparison of the amount of unstable lung
Time Frame: 1 hour
comparison of the amount of unstable lung in percentage
1 hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nestor Pistillo, MD, Hospital de Alta Complejidad en Red El Cruce Néstor C. Kirchner

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 3, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 3, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ARDS, Human

Clinical Trials on Controlled mechanical ventilation

Subscribe