SWiFT Canada (Study of Whole Blood in Frontline Trauma) (SWiFTCanada)

April 29, 2026 updated by: Unity Health Toronto

SWiFT Canada (Study of Whole Blood in Frontline Trauma): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing Prehospital Whole Blood Versus Component Therapy in Traumatic Hemorrhage

Traumatic injuries affect people of all ages, races, and socioeconomic backgrounds. The Global Burden of Disease study showed that globally in 2019, there were more than 4.4 million deaths due to injury. Furthermore, unintentional injuries are the leading cause of death for people aged 5-29 years worldwide. Uncontrolled bleeding accounts for a significant proportion of these deaths, with approximately 20% occurring in the first 24 hours and 40% occurring within the first 30 days.

Blood transfusion is a life-saving treatment in the management of bleeding patients until bleeding is controlled in hospital, typically delivered through different blood components (red blood cells, plasma and platelets). These components are derived from a whole blood donation and are stored in separate bags (units). There are challenges in carrying separate blood products, such as additional weight in kit bags, and transfusing multiple blood products at the scene can delay transport to hospital.

In Ontario, Ornge Air Ambulance carries red blood cells and plasma to transfuse prehospital. However, a prehospital transfusion strategy has not been established and practice varies across the Canadian setting, and more broadly across the world.

This trial aims to investigate if carrying and transfusing two units of whole blood instead of four units (two red blood cells and two plasma) is feasible and leads to better outcomes for patients.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Early blood transfusion improves survival in patients with life-threatening bleeding, but the optimal transfusion strategy in the prehospital setting has yet to be established. Although there is some evidence of benefit with the use of Whole Blood (WB), there have been no RCTs exploring the clinical effectiveness of prehospital administration of WB versus component therapy for bleeding trauma patients in the Canadian setting. The lack of high-quality clinical evidence is recognized in the recent NAC recommendations for the use of WB in Canada.

In collaboration with the SWiFT UK team, the SWiFT Canada study will follow the SWiFT UK protocol but as adopted for the Canadian context. This may allow for future comparisons on effectiveness of the two systems and pilot the ability for two countries with different prehospital systems to be able to follow a similar study protocol for future international RCTs.

Lastly, we have confirmed the support from CBS for the manufacturing and distribution of WB for the duration of the SWiFT Canada trial. Therefore, it is essential for patients, healthcare professionals and blood services that the clinical effectiveness of prehospital WB transfusion is evaluated in a trial before its widespread implementation across CBS in Canada. A national program of WB production would necessitate significant changes in the current manufacturing processes for blood services, in order to provide appropriate support for hospitals. WB production could potentially affect the supply of blood components required to treat other patients, as a unit of WB cannot be used to manufacture other components. However, it could also be argued that early transfusion of WB may reduce the need for further blood component transfusion when patients arrive at hospital, due to earlier control of bleeding. Following the proposed objectives of this pilot RCT would enable us to evaluate all these uncertainties and assist in the planning of a future larger RCT.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • Recruiting
        • Ornge Air Ambulance
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Brodie Nolan, MD MSc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient who has suffered a traumatic injury
  • Attended by a participating Ornge AAS clinical team
  • Requires prehospital blood transfusion to treat major traumatic hemorrhage

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pediatric (age <16 or transported to pediatric trauma centre [if age unknown])
  • No intravenous or intraosseous access (should be assessed prior to opening box)
  • Knowledge that patient will object to being given blood transfusion for any reasons
  • Blood already administered on-scene, prior to arrival of the participating Ornge AAS

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Whole Blood (WB)

The use of Whole Blood (WB), leukocytes reduced is indicated for treatment of patients with clinically significant bleeding and have low anti-A and anti-B titres.

Patients will be administered up to 2 units of whole blood administered via either intravenous (IV) or intraosseous (IO) route, according to standard practice at Ornge AAS.

2 units of whole blood administered by Ornge AAS
Active Comparator: Red Blood Cells and Plasma

The control arm will consist of 2 units of RBC and 2 units of plasma (dependent on the standard practice of the Ornge AAS).

RBC and plasma may be administered via either the intravenous (IV) or intraosseous (IO) route, according to standard clinical practice at Ornge AAS.

2 units of RBC + 2 units of plasma administered by Ornge AAS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients enrolled in the study that receive a prehospital transfusion and had full study data collected
Time Frame: through study completion, up to 90 days
Feasibility target: >90% patients enrolled were able to link prehospital to in-hospital records and >90% complete data obtained
through study completion, up to 90 days
Number of patients that completed transfusion of at least 1 unit of assigned blood products prior to arrival to receiving lead trauma hospital
Time Frame: Enrolment to day 1 after enrolment
Feasibility target: at least 1 unit of blood [WB, RBC, or plasma] transfused prior to arrival >90% of the time
Enrolment to day 1 after enrolment
Number of patients that completed transfusion of all assigned blood products at the receiving lead trauma hospital
Time Frame: Enrolment to day 1 after enrolment
Feasibility target: >90% if not already done prior to arrival of hospital
Enrolment to day 1 after enrolment
Number of patients screened for the study by not randomized due to lack of group O negative WB availability.
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
through study completion, an average of 1 year
To describe the distribution, redistribution and wastage of WB units produced for the study
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Feasibility target: <10% wastage of WB units produced for the study
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Death or Massive Transfusion at 24hrs
Time Frame: through study completion, up to 90 days
To determine the impact of prehospital administration of WB on the proportion of participants who experience death or massive transfusion at 24 hours, compared to the current standard of care (component blood therapy).
through study completion, up to 90 days
Mortality - 90 days
Time Frame: through study completion, up to 90 days
To determine the impact on mortality up to 90 days.
through study completion, up to 90 days
Mortality - 30 days
Time Frame: through study completion, up to 90 days
To determine the impact on morbidity up to 30 days.
through study completion, up to 90 days
Organ Failure Free Days
Time Frame: through study completion, up to 90 days
To determine the impact of organ failure free days (hospital resource use) up to discharge
through study completion, up to 90 days
Critical Care Days
Time Frame: through study completion, up to 90 days
To determine the impact of time spent in critical care (hospital resource use) up to discharge
through study completion, up to 90 days
Total in-patient stay
Time Frame: through study completion, up to 90 days
To determine the impact on total in-patient stay (hospital resource use) up to discharge
through study completion, up to 90 days
Blood components received
Time Frame: through study completion, up to 90 days
To determine the impact on blood components received (hospital resource use) up to discharge
through study completion, up to 90 days
Hemostatic agents received
Time Frame: through study completion, up to 90 days
To determine the impact additional hemostatic agents received (hospital resource use) up to discharge
through study completion, up to 90 days
treatment-emergent adverse events
Time Frame: through study completion, up to 90 days
To assess the safety and tolerability of prehospital transfusion by the incidence of treatment-emergent transfusion adverse events.
through study completion, up to 90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 16, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 5, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Publish study protocol, including statiscal analysis plan, informed consent process

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Starting in September 2024, protocol will be available.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Please contact the trial leadership at swift@unityhealth.to

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Trauma

Clinical Trials on Whole Blood

Subscribe