- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06505863
Quality of Life After Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision Compared to Traditional Total Mesorectal Excision
July 9, 2025 updated by: Yanic Ammann, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen
Does Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (taTME) Result in Better Quality of Life and Functional Outcomes Than Traditional Total Mesorectal Excision? A Retrospective Propensity Score-adjusted Cohort Study
The improvement in prognosis of rectal cancer through modern therapy modalities rises questions regarding quality of life (QoL) and functional outcomes.
Evidence for long-term QoL and functional outcomes of transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) is not provided in current literature.
This study will compare short-term and long-term QoL and functional outcomes after taTME compared to traditional abdominal TME (laparoscopic, robotic, and open approach)
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Quality of life and functional outcomes of patients undergoing taTME or abTME for stage I-III rectal cancer will be analysed.
A retrospective propensity score-adjusted analysis of prospectively conducted data will be performed.
The primary endpoint QoL will be assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer core questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30).
Secondary endpoints are the functional outcomes according to the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
249
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Saint-Gall, Switzerland, 9000
- Cantonal Hospital of St.Gallen
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Patients receiving elective total mesorectal excision followed by reconstruction with anastomosis for primary rectal cancer at the Cantonal hospital of St.Gallen, Switzerland.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- elective total mesorectal excision followed by reconstruction with anastomosis for primary rectal cancer
Exclusion Criteria:
- diagnoses other than rectal cancer
- recurrent rectal cancer
- partial mesorectal excision
- discontinuity resection (no anastomosis)
- incomplete TNM staging information
- metastatic cancer
- 30-day mortality
- lack of quality of life data
- patient decline
- age under 18 years
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
taTME
Patients who underwent transanal total mesorectal excision with anastomosis for primary rectal cancer UICC stage I to III
|
Transanal approach in surgical treatment of rectal cancer along the anatomical and embryological planes, called total mesorectal excision, as described in 1988 by Heald et al.
|
|
abTME
Patients who underwent laparoscopic, robotic, or open total mesorectal excision with anastomosis for primary rectal cancer UICC stage I to III
|
Patients who underwent laparoscopic, robotic, or open total mesorectal excision with anastomosis for primary rectal cancer UICC stage I to III
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of life (QoL)
Time Frame: 5 years after initial operation
|
Assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer core questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30):
|
5 years after initial operation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Functional outcomes
Time Frame: 5 years after initial operation
|
Assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer core questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30):
|
5 years after initial operation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Walter Brunner, PD Dr. med., Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
August 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Actual)
January 1, 2025
Study Completion (Actual)
July 1, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 11, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 11, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
July 17, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
July 14, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 9, 2025
Last Verified
July 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- taTME QoL
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
The anonymized patient data that support the findings of this study are available and can be obtained upon reasonable request.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Quality of Life
-
Ziekenhuis Oost-LimburgRecruitingQuality of Life | Postoperative Quality of Recovery | Health-Related Quality-of-LifeBelgium
-
B. Braun Medical SAUnknownQuality of Life of Colostomized Patient
-
Istituto Ortopedico RizzoliUniversity of BolognaCompletedImprove Quality of LifeItaly
-
Children's National Research InstituteCompletedProfessional Quality of LifeUnited States
-
Assiut UniversityUnknownImproving Quality of LifeEgypt
-
Linkoeping UniversityRecruiting
-
South Valley UniversityActive, not recruitingDeterminants of Health-related Quality of Life for Patients After Renal Lithotripsy: PNL Versus RIRSHealth Related Quality of LifeEgypt
-
Region VästmanlandUnknownHealth Related Quality of Life
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedHealth Related Quality of LifeEgypt
-
Institute of Oncology LjubljanaUnknownHealth-related Quality of LifeSlovenia
Clinical Trials on Transanal total mesorectal excision
-
Sun Yat-sen UniversityCompleted
-
Yanhong DengCompleted
-
University Hospital Gregorio MarañónHospital del Rio Hortega; Hospital de Leon; University of Navarrra Hospital (Clinica...RecruitingRectal Cancer | Sphincter Ani IncontinenceSpain
-
Third Military Medical UniversityCompletedRectal Cancer | Perioperative ComplicationChina
-
Ruijin HospitalWithdrawn
-
National Cancer Center, KoreaActive, not recruitingRectal CancerKorea, Republic of
-
Cantonal Hospital of St. GallenRecruitingRecurrence | Mortality | Survival | Postoperative MorbiditySwitzerland
-
National Cancer Center, KoreaCompletedRectal CancerKorea, Republic of
-
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiSociety of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons; Research Foundation...Active, not recruiting
-
National Cancer Center, KoreaActive, not recruitingRectal CancerKorea, Republic of