- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06522282
Emergency Stroke Unit for Acute Cerebrovascular Events ( ESU-ACE-D )
September 27, 2024 updated by: Yongjun Wang, Beijing Tiantan Hospital
Emergency Stroke Unit for Acute Cerebrovascular Events--A Prospective, Multicenter, Week-wise Randomized, Controlled Trial ( ESU-ACE-D )
To compare the prognosis of patients with hyperacute ischemic stroke (arriving at the emergency department between 4.5-6 hours of symptom onset) managed in a standard stroke unit adherent to guidelines versus managed in Emergency Stroke Unit (a new stroke unit based on low-field magnetic resonance imaging).
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The first MRI machines in the 1970s and 1980s were low-field due to technological limitations.
As technology advanced, the focus shifted to higher field strengths to achieve better image resolution and faster scan times.
Recently, there has been renewed interest in low-field MRI due to advancements in hardware and software, making them more viable for specific clinical applications, including acute stroke.
Prompt and accurate imaging is crucial for diagnosing ischemic stroke and determining the appropriate treatment (e.g., thrombolysis or thrombectomy).
Research has demonstrated that low-field MRI can effectively detect acute ischemic changes and distinguish between ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke.
By providing accessible, cost-effective, and safe imaging, it can facilitate timely and accurate treatment, particularly in settings where high-field MRI is not readily available.
This prospective, multicenter, week-wise randomized controlled trial will compare the prognosis of patients with hyperacute ischemic stroke (arriving at the emergency department between 4.5-6 hours of symptom onset) managed in a standard stroke unit adherent to guidelines versus managed in Emergency Stroke Unit (a new stroke unit based on low-field magnetic resonance imaging).
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
600
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Jing Jing
- Phone Number: 15810312511
- Email: jingj_bjttyy@163.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Yongjun Wang
- Phone Number: 59978555
- Email: yongjunwang111@aliyun.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Beijing, China
- Recruiting
- Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University
-
Contact:
- Yongjun Wang, Dr.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
- Age ≥ 18 years;
- Patients who arrive at the emergency department between 4.5-6 hours of symptom onset* (*Symptom onset is defined by the "last seen normal" principle);
- Presenting with ischemic stroke symptoms;
- Pre-stroke mRS score 0-1;
- Baseline NIHSS score ≥ 5;
- Eligible for endovascular thrombectomy;
- Informed consent signed.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Baseline NIHSS score < 5;
- Unable to undergo MRI because of claustrophobia;
- Patients with cardiac pacemaker/brain pacemaker/insulin pump implantation;
- Definite contraindication for endovascular thrombectomy;
- Patients with postictal hemiparesis (Todd's paralysis) or those with concomitant neurological/psychiatric conditions who are unable or unwilling to cooperate;
- Pregnant women, nursing mothers, or reluctance to use effective contraceptive measures during the period of trial;
- Participation in other interventional randomized clinical trials within 3 months before enrollment;
- Patients deemed unsuitable for participation in this trial by the investigator or those for whom participation in this trial may result in greater risks.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Emergency Stroke Unit based on 0.23-T MRI
The participants with hyperacute ischemic stroke (arriving at the emergency department between 4.5-6 hours of symptom onset) who are eligible to receive reperfusion therapy will be managed by Emergency Stroke Unit process based on low-field magnetic resonance imaging.
|
The participants with hyperacute ischemic stroke (arriving at the emergency department between 4.5-6 hours of symptom onset) who are eligible to receive reperfusion therapy will be managed by Emergency Stroke Unit process based on low-field magnetic resonance imaging.
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Standard stroke unit adherent to guidelines
The participants with hyperacute ischemic stroke (arriving at the emergency department between 4.5-6 hours of symptom onset) who are eligible to receive reperfusion therapy will be managed by standard stroke unit process adherent to guidelines.
|
The participants with hyperacute ischemic stroke (arriving at the emergency department between 4.5-6 hours of symptom onset) who are eligible to receive reperfusion therapy will be managed by standard stroke unit process adherent to guidelines.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The utility-weighted modified Rankin Scale (uw-mRS) at 90 days (± 7 days).
Time Frame: at 90 days (± 7 days).
|
The utility-weighted modified Rankin Scale (uw-mRS) at 90 days (± 7 days).
Scores on the modified Rankin scale range from 0 (no neurologic deficit) to 6 (death).
|
at 90 days (± 7 days).
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Ordinal (shift) analysis of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days (± 7 days).
Time Frame: at 90 days (± 7 days).
|
Ordinal (shift) analysis of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days (± 7 days).
Scores on the modified Rankin scale range from 0 (no neurologic deficit) to 6 (death).
|
at 90 days (± 7 days).
|
|
A 30% reduction (improvement) from baseline to 24 hours in the NIHSS score.
Time Frame: from baseline to 24 hours in the NIHSS score
|
A 30% reduction (improvement) from baseline to 24 hours in the NIHSS score.
Scores on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) range from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater neurological deficits.
|
from baseline to 24 hours in the NIHSS score
|
|
The cost-effectiveness analysis.
Time Frame: up to 3 months from enrollment.
|
Cost Effectiveness as measured by average patient QALYs, post-stroke healthcare utilization, incremental fixed costs associated with the ESU.
|
up to 3 months from enrollment.
|
|
Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhages (according to the ECASS III criteria) within 36 hours.
Time Frame: within 36 hours
|
Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhages within 36 hours (sICH definition: according to the ECASS III criteria: any apparently extravascular blood in the brain or within the cranium that was associated with clinical deterioration, as defined by an increase of 4 points or more in the score on the NIHSS, or that led to death and that was identified as the predominant cause of the neurological deterioration).
|
within 36 hours
|
|
Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhages (according to the ECASS III criteria) at 90 days (± 7 days).
Time Frame: at 90 days (± 7 days)
|
Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhages at 90 days (± 7 days) (sICH definition: according to the ECASS III criteria: any apparently extravascular blood in the brain or within the cranium that was associated with clinical deterioration, as defined by an increase of 4 points or more in the score on the NIHSS, or that led to death and that was identified as the predominant cause of the neurological deterioration).
|
at 90 days (± 7 days)
|
|
Mortality at 90 days (± 7 days).
Time Frame: at 90 days (± 7 days).
|
at 90 days (± 7 days).
|
|
|
Adverse events at 90 days (± 7 days).
Time Frame: at 90 days (± 7 days).
|
at 90 days (± 7 days).
|
|
|
Serious adverse events at 90 days (± 7 days).
Time Frame: at 90 days (± 7 days).
|
at 90 days (± 7 days).
|
|
|
Excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score, mRS 0-1) at 90 days (± 7 days).
Time Frame: at 90 days (± 7 days)
|
Excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score, mRS 0-1) at 90 days (± 7 days).
Scores on the modified Rankin scale range from 0 (no neurologic deficit) to 6 (death).
|
at 90 days (± 7 days)
|
|
Good functional outcome (Modified Rankin Scale score, mRS 0-2) at 90 days (± 7 days).
Time Frame: at 90 days (± 7 days).
|
Good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score, mRS 0-2) at 90 days (± 7 days).
Scores on the modified Rankin scale range from 0 (no neurologic deficit) to 6 (death).
|
at 90 days (± 7 days).
|
|
The time from symptoms onset to endovascular thrombectomy decision.
Time Frame: from baseline to reperfusion therapy
|
The time from symptoms onset to endovascular thrombectomy decision.
|
from baseline to reperfusion therapy
|
|
The time from emergency department arrival to endovascular thrombectomy decision.
Time Frame: from baseline to reperfusion therapy
|
The time from emergency department arrival to endovascular thrombectomy decision.
|
from baseline to reperfusion therapy
|
|
Proportion of participants ultimately treated with reperfusion therapy.
Time Frame: from baseline to reperfusion therapy
|
Proportion of participants ultimately treated with reperfusion therapy (separated rate of intravenous thrombolysis / endovascular thrombectomy[within 6 hours from symptom onset to treatment; all] / bridging therapy).
|
from baseline to reperfusion therapy
|
|
The time from emergency department arrival to the puncture of endovascular thrombectomy.
Time Frame: from baseline to reperfusion therapy
|
The time from emergency department arrival to the puncture of endovascular thrombectomy (Door-to-puncture time [DPT]).
|
from baseline to reperfusion therapy
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Yongjun Wang, Beijing Tiantan Hospital
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
August 10, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2026
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 1, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 22, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
July 26, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
October 1, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 27, 2024
Last Verified
July 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- KY2024-131-02-D
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Ischemic Stroke, Acute
-
University Hospital HeidelbergCompletedAcute Ischemic Stroke | Acute Ischemic Stroke AIS | Acute Ischemic Stroke PatientsGermany
-
University of CalgaryThe George Institute for Global Health, AustraliaRecruitingAcute Ischemic Stroke AIS | Stroke, Acute, Stroke Ischemic | Stroke AcuteCanada, Australia
-
University of MiamiNo longer availableStroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Mesenchymal Stem Cells | Acute Ischemic Stroke | Stroke/Brain AttackUnited States
-
Southwest Hospital, ChinaRecruitingAcute Ischemic Stroke PatientsChina
-
Hyogo Medical UniversityRecruitingAcute Ischemic Stroke | Endovascular Therapy | Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS) Related to a Distal OcclusionJapan
-
NeurotechnikaSamara State Medical University; Samara Regional Clinical Hospital V.D. SeredavinRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Acute | Stroke, Acute, Ischemic | Stroke with HemiparesisRussian Federation
-
Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityNot yet recruitingMild Disabling Acute Ischemic Stroke
-
Dongzhimen Hospital, BeijingThe Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University; Peking University Third Hospital and other collaboratorsRecruitingStroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Acute Ischemic StrokeChina
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital; First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University and other collaboratorsRecruitingAcute Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic AttacksChina
-
Beijing Tiantan HospitalCompletedIschemic Stroke, AcuteChina
Clinical Trials on Emergency Stroke Unit based on 0.23-T MRI
-
Yongjun WangRecruiting
-
Beijing Tiantan HospitalCompleted
-
Beijing Tiantan HospitalCompleted