Periosteal Pedicle Flap Versus Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft in Management of Gingival Recession

July 29, 2024 updated by: Alzahraa Alghriany, Assiut University

Can a Periosteal Pedicle Flap Replace the Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft in the Management of Gingival Recession? Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Gingival recession is defined as the apical shift of the marginal gingiva from its normal position on the crown of the tooth to levels on the root surface beyond the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ).Various surgical procedures including repositioned flaps as well as autogenous and other type grafts have been used in the treatment of gingival recession.The present gold standard technique is the bilaminar technique using the subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) which provides for long-term stability but also increases tissue morbidity.Hence, a suitable alternative technique - the periosteal pedicle flap (PPF) - has been practiced, which is less invasive, does not require a second surgical site, and provides a graft of adequate dimensions.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with one or more Miller's Class 1 and Class II buccal recessions demonstrating ≤20% of plaque and bleeding scores, respectively, after Phase I therapy.
  • age from 18 th 60 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Smokers
  • patients with malposed or crowded teeth
  • pregnant and lactating women
  • patients using medications that could affect the periodontal status

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Subepothelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) group
Subepithelial connective tissue graft from palate then coronally positioning flap to cover root recession
The SCTG will be harvested from the palate followed by coronally postionting flap
Active Comparator: Periosteal pedicle flap (PPF) group
periosteal flap elevation and repositioning to the root then coronally positioning flap to cover root recession
he periosteal pedicle graft obtained is then turned over the exposed root surface then followed by coronally postionting flap

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the percentage of root coverage (%RC)
Time Frame: at base line, 1 month and 3 months after treatment
to measure the coverage percentage of root recession by UNC periodontal probe Preoperative recession depth - Postoperative recession depth /Preoperative recession depth x 100
at base line, 1 month and 3 months after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
recession depth
Time Frame: at base line, 1 month and 3 months after treatment
to measure vertical recession by UNC periodontal probe from cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to the gingival margin.
at base line, 1 month and 3 months after treatment
recession width
Time Frame: at base line, 1 month and 3 months after treatment
to measure horizontal recession by UNC periodontal probe the distance between the CEJ and the gingival margin
at base line, 1 month and 3 months after treatment
clinical attachment gain
Time Frame: at base line, 1 month and 3 months after treatment
to measure the periodontal attachment gain after treatment by UNC periodontal probe subtracting the sulcus depth from the distance between the free gingival margin and the mucogingival junction.
at base line, 1 month and 3 months after treatment
keratinized tissue gain
Time Frame: at base line, 1 month and 3 months after treatment
measure the gain in keratinized gingivaby UNC periodontal probe from the most apical point of the gingival margin to the mucogingival junction (MGJ) at the middle buccal point.
at base line, 1 month and 3 months after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 26, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 31, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 31, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • periosteal pedicle flap

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gingival Recession

Clinical Trials on SCTG followed by coronally postionting flap

Subscribe