Prostate Adaptive Radiation Therapy

Prostate ART is a two phase study looking at using adaptive radiotherapy to help reduce toxicity for prostate cancer patients.

Adaptive radiotherapy is a new technology that provides the ability to account for daily changes in anatomy. Adaptive radiotherapy also provides a foundation for which radiotherapy margins might be safely reduced.

Phase 1 of this study is looking to see if a radiation therapist centred adaptive workflow can be implemented. If phase 1 of this study is safe and feasible, the study will proceed to phase 2.

Part 2 of the study looks at using adaptive technology to reduce radiation treatment margins. The primary aim of this study is to see whether margin reduced treatment using adaptive radiotherapy can reduce side effects for prostate cancer patients.

Study Overview

• Status: Recruiting
• Conditions: Prostatic Neoplasms
• Intervention / Treatment: Radiation: Adaptive radiotherapy +/- Margin Reduction; Radiation: Image guided radiotherapy

Detailed Description

Despite major technological advancements in the delivery of pelvic radiation therapy including the use of dynamic therapy, image guidance, integrated boosting and stereotactic techniques, toxicity from pelvic radiation remains a significant issue impacting on patient's quality of life and preventing the delivery of higher (and more curative) doses of radiation. Although evidence showed that adaptive radiotherapy demonstrating promising reduction of acute toxicity, the uptake of adaptive radiotherapy remains poor as adaptive radiation therapy is very labour intensive, time consuming and usually requires a radiation oncologist (RO) and Medical Physicist in attendance to review/modify target contours. These practices of daily multi-disciplinary team (MDT) in person attendance is not sustainable in the long term.

Since 2021, Royal North Shore Hospital has been treating patients with cancer in the pelvic with Adaptive Radiation Therapy (ART) and Radiation Therapists (RT) at the site have undergone a rigorous University based Advanced Practitioner training programme.

This study aims to evaluate RT-led ART in a randomised trial to assess the safety and feasibility of ART in a two stage phase 3 randomised controlled trial. If this study can prove safety and feasibility in the first phase, it will proceed to the second phase of the study which will look at using adaptive radiotherapy to safely reduce CTV and PTV margins.

The primary aim of the study will be to measure the difference in combined acute patient reported gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity between ART with margin reduction versus standard radiotherapy. Secondary aims will be to look at differences in biochemical failure, the time efficiency of ART, the radiation dosimetric differences between the treatment arms and patients' perception of ART.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Estimated): 130
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

• Study Contact: Name: Heidi Tsang; Phone Number: +61294631340; Email: heidi.tsang@health.nsw.gov.au
• Study Contact Backup: Name: Nada Cheikh-Ali; Phone Number: +61294631345; Email: nada.cheikhali@health.nsw.gov.au

Study Locations

• Australia
  • New South Wales
    • St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia, 2065
      • Recruiting
      • Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital
      • Contact: Andrew Kneebone, MBBS; Phone Number: +61294631300; Email: Andrew.Kneebone@health.nsw.gov.au
      • Sub-Investigator: Thomas Eade, MBBS
      • Sub-Investigator: George Hruby, MBBS
      • Sub-Investigator: Sarah Bergamin, MBBS
      • Sub-Investigator: Joseph Chan, MBBS
      • Contact: Nada Cheikh-Ali; Phone Number: +61294631345; Email: nada.cheikhali@health.nsw.gov.au

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: Adult; Older Adult
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. - Age > 18
2. Biopsy proven prostate malignancy
3. Definitive treatment is radiotherapy to the prostate alone
4. ECOG performance status 0-2
5. Ability to understand and the willingness to sign an informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Hip prosthesis
2. Patient separation from prostate centre to skin edge > 24cm, measured on diagnostic scan-

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Adaptive radiotherapy +/- margin reduction; Phase 1 and 2: Treating Radiation Therapists (RTs) on the treatment machine will review the treatment target and organs at risk contours that are automatically generated on the plan of the day. They will modify these safely, as required, and then also approve the computer generated re-plan of the day, within the bounds of departmental protocols and decision guides (RT led). Phase 2 only: Margin reduction facilitated by adaptive radiotherapy.	Radiation: Adaptive radiotherapy +/- Margin Reduction; Radiotherapy using adaptive technology to recontour and replan daily as required. Reductions in the PTV margin will also be introduced in the second phase of this study.; Other Names: ART
Active Comparator: Standard radiotherapy; Patients will receive standard image guided radiotherapy	Radiation: Image guided radiotherapy; Standard radiation treatment used in the department of radiation oncology for prostate cancer; Other Names: IGRT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Safety of Adaptive Radiation Therapy via Radiation Therapists-led* treatment delivery (CTV coverage)	A comparison of Clinical Target Volume (CTV) dose coverage will be performed. The CTV dose coverage must be equal or better in 90% of fractions for 90% of patients compared with the virtual image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) fraction. Dose coverage will be calculated as the percent of CTV receiving at least 95% of the prescribed dose (TD).	12 months
Safety of Adaptive Radiation Therapy via Radiation Therapists-led* treatment delivery (OAR DVH constraints)	A comparison of organ at risk (OAR) dose-volume histogram (DVH) constraints will be performed. The OAR DVH dose constraints must be equal or better in 90% of fractions for 90% of patients compared with the virtual image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) fraction.	12 months
Feasibility of ART via RT-led* treatment delivery	At least 90% of patients must have 90% of planned adaptive treatments successfully delivered in phase 1 of the study.	12 months
Acute patient reported toxicity	The study will measure the difference in patient reported combined maximum GU and GI toxicity (Grade 2 or higher) as per PRO-CTCAE between the two treatment arms.	Within 90 days of patients completing treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Acute clinician reported toxicity	The study will measure the difference in acute combined maximum GU and GI toxicity (Grade 2 or higher) grading between the two treatment arms as reported by clinicians using CTCAE v5.0	Within 90 days of patients completing treatment
Late clinician reported toxicity	The study will measure the difference in late GU and GI toxicity (Grade 2 or higher) between the two treatment arms as reported by clinicians using CTCAE v5.0	5 years
Late patient reported toxicity	The study will measure the difference in patient reported late GU and GI toxicity (Grade 2 or higher) between the two treatment arms as per PRO-CTCAE.	5 years
Biochemical progression Free Survival	The rate of biochemical failure as defined as Nadir+2.0, commencement of ADT for relapse or evidence of disease recurrence on imaging	3 and 5 years
Time differences between treatment arms	The study will assess the average absolute treatment time difference per fraction for adaptive radiation therapy compared to prostate IGRT.	1 and 5 years
Radiation dosimetric differences between treatment arms	The study will evaluate the radiation dosimetric differences between treatment using ART and treatment using standard prostate IGRT	1 and 5 years
Patient reported attitudes and perceptions	The study will assess the patient experience with radiotherapy on a five item questionnaire that uses a five-point Likert-scale (ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree). Differences in responses for each question between the arms will be reported.	1 and 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Royal North Shore Hospital
• Collaborators: Northern Sydney and Central Coast Area Health Service
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Andrew Prof Kneebone, MBBS, Northern Sydney Local Health District

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): October 1, 2025
• Primary Completion (Estimated): October 31, 2029
• Study Completion (Estimated): October 31, 2031

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: July 25, 2024
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: August 7, 2024
• First Posted (Actual): August 9, 2024

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): February 5, 2026
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: February 3, 2026
• Last Verified: February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Urogenital Diseases; Genital Diseases; Genital Neoplasms, Male; Urogenital Neoplasms; Neoplasms by Site; Neoplasms; Genital Diseases, Male; Prostatic Diseases; Male Urogenital Diseases; Prostatic Neoplasms; Therapeutics; Radiotherapy; Radiotherapy, Image-Guided
• Other Study ID Numbers: Prostate ART

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO
• IPD Plan Description: No IPD will be shared with other researchers. Only group data will be published.

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No