The Effectiveness of Lumber Regression Technique on Disc Bulge Randomized Control Trial

August 7, 2024 updated by: Muhammad Naveed Babur, Superior University
Lumbar disc bulges lead to considerable pain and disability in affected individuals, with current interventions lacking consistency of outcomes. The lumbar regression method offered a hopeful, noninvasive option.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

this study was proposed to evaluate its efficacy in improving accessary lower limb flexibility and reducing functional disability and pain management. To provide evidence about its effectiveness and help with clinical practice, this study aimed to improve patient outcomes in subjects having lumbar disc bulges.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punjab
      • Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
        • Nemat Hospital & Heart Center, Manga Mandi

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals with a diagnosis of Disc bulge confirmed by MRI.
  • Between 18 and 65 years of age.
  • Chronic low back pain from the last 3 months
  • A stable treatment environment that allows intervention.
  • Ability to understand and follow course directions.
  • Willingness to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Spondylolisthesis
  • Spondylosis
  • Vertebral fracture
  • Lack of ava
  • Further research interventions.
  • Unstable medical condition

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Advanced Physiotherapy
The physiotherapist used the regression techniques for 1 hour of session 2 times for 8 weeks. The caudal component involved the spinous process of the treated segment touching the therapist's hand and not applying force as though mobilising the segment at grade 2. These were applied if there is a suspected case of a posterolateral disc prolapse where the aim is to increase the diameter of the foramen and decrease the tension exerted on the nerve root. Applied posteroanterior was used to distract the anterior intervertebral end plate and to approximate the posterior end plates so as to pull back the protruded nuclear material by creating a negative pressure.
Active Comparator: Conventional Physiotherapytechniques
In traditional physiotherapy, the patient underwent two sessions per week for eight weeks. Each session lasted one hour and included 20minutes of TENS treatment. The flexibility exercises consisted of hamstring stretches and single and double knee-to-chest stretches. The strengthening exercises were partial sit-ups, quadruped lifts, and double leg hold; pelvic tilts were performed with 10-15 repetitions, each held for 20-30 seconds and repeated three times.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Roland Morris disability questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 Months
The Roland-Morris low back pain and disability questionnaire (RMD) was utilised to evaluate the quality of life prior to and following the completion of the treatment. This questionnaire has demonstrated strong validity and reliability. The score is measured on a scale of 0 to 24, and percentage scores were calculated for each participant. Greater scores indicate a greater level of disabilities. Its sensitivity is 95%, and its specificity is 69%.
12 Months
Straight Leg Raise
Time Frame: 12 months
The normal angle for an SLR is from 0-35 degrees, which signifies the least amount of strain. Stretched from 35-70 degrees, sciatic nerve root stretching is achieved, and possible problems such as herniated disc or radiculopathy may be evidenced. 70- 90 degrees reflect highest normal flexibility: it may be related to hip joint pathology or some other conditions which are not a result of nerve injury. During both the first evaluation and the final therapy, the SLR was assessed using a digital inclinometer (clinometer) installed on a Techno Camon 20 Android phone. The digital inclinometer has been found to exhibit high levels of reliability and validity
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 7, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 12, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MSRSW/Batch-Fall22/736

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Disc Disease

Clinical Trials on Advanced Physiotherapy

Subscribe