Tesamorelin as an Adjunct to Exercise for Improving Physical Function in HIV (TRIUMPH)

May 15, 2026 updated by: Lindsay Fourman, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital

People with HIV experience earlier impairments in physical function compared to people in the general population. They also exhibit an earlier presentation and more rapid development of frailty, a multisystemic syndrome of aging characterized by reduced activity, fatigue, slowness, weakness, and weight loss. While exercise can improve physical function in people with HIV, it is less effective in doing so than in the general population and is difficult to sustain in the long-term.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether the medication tesamorelin will improve physical function and muscle health in adults with HIV when combined with exercise. Tesamorelin is a growth hormone-releasing hormone analogue that is FDA-approved to treat abdominal fat accumulation in people with HIV. While tesamorelin has also been shown to increase muscle mass and improve measures of muscle health, its effects on physical performance and muscle strength have not yet been evaluated.

During a 24-week intervention phase, half of participants will be randomly assigned to receive tesamorelin and half of participants will be randomly assigned to receive placebo (a look-alike substance that contains no drug). All participants also will engage in a home-based exercise intervention supervised by an exercise coach. During a subsequent 24-week extension phase, individuals will be monitored off study drug and supervised exercise, and be encouraged to continue to exercise independently.

The investigators will investigate effects of tesamorelin on physical function, muscle mass and quality, quality of life, and exercise adherence and self-efficacy. They also will evaluate whether effects of tesamorelin are maintained following treatment cessation. This study may identify an important strategy to improve how individuals aging with HIV function and feel with potential applications to other patient populations.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Lindsay T. Fourman, MD
  • Phone Number: 617-643-4590
  • Email: lfourman@mgb.org

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Men and women, 50-80 years old
  2. Documented HIV infection on suppressive antiretroviral therapy for at least 1 year with HIV-1 RNA <200 copies/mL and CD4+ T cell count >200/µL 3
  3. Sedentary lifestyle, defined as self-reported physical activity that breaks a sweat <3 days/week with no regular resistance exercise in the past 3 months
  4. ≥1 Fried frailty criterion (weakness, slow gait speed, exhaustion, decreased physical activity, or unintentional weight loss as defined by specific thresholds)
  5. Excess abdominal adiposity as indicated by at least one of the following elevated anthropometric measures assessed at Screen: (1) waist circumference ≥102 cm in non-Asian males (≥90 cm in Asian males) or ≥88 cm in non-Asian females (≥80 cm in Asian females); (2) waist-to-hip ratio ≥0.9 in males or ≥0.85 in females; (3) waist-to-height ratio ≥0.5 in males and females
  6. Normal mammogram within 2 years (females ≤74 years old) or prostate specific antigen <4 ng/mL (males ≤70 years old) per U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) age-appropriate cancer screening guidelines
  7. For females, postmenopausal defined as no menses for ≥12 months and anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) <20 pg/mL or history of bilateral oophorectomy at least 3 months ago
  8. Provider approval to participate

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Use of tesamorelin or other growth hormone (GH)-based therapy within 6 months
  2. Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) z-score >2.0
  3. HbA1c >8%
  4. Active or suspected malignancy (with the exception of non-melanoma skin cancer) within 24 months
  5. Supraphysiologic testosterone or corticosteroid exposure, or change in exogenous testosterone or corticosteroid dose within 3 months
  6. Change in glucose-lowering medication (e.g., glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists) within 3 months
  7. Active or unstable coronary artery disease, chest pain suspicious for angina, or serious arrythmia
  8. History of hypopituitarism, head irradiation, or other conditions known to affect the GH/IGF-1 axis
  9. Known hypersensitivity to tesamorelin or mannitol
  10. Acute or chronic illness judged by the investigator to represent a contraindication to study participation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Plus Exercise
Identical placebo given subcutaneously daily plus home-based semi-supervised exercise intervention
Home-based semi-supervised exercise program
Identical placebo injection given subcutaneously daily
Active Comparator: Tesamorelin Plus Exercise
Tesamorelin WR 1.28 mg given subcutaneously daily plus home-based semi-supervised exercise intervention
Home-based semi-supervised exercise program
Tesamorelin WR 1.28 mg given subcutaneously daily
Other Names:
  • Egrifta, TH9507, growth hormone-releasing hormone analogue

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Repeated Chair Stand Time
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24
Time to complete 10 repeated chair stands
Baseline to Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Standard and Modified Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24
Objective assessment of physical function that includes measures of balance, gait, and strength
Baseline to Week 24
Change in 1-Repetition Maximum Leg Press
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24
Maximal weight that can be lifted by lower extremities once using correct form through full range of motion
Baseline to Week 24
Change in 400-Meter Walk Time
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24
Time to walk 400 meters at the fastest pace possible
Baseline to Week 24
Change in Appendicular Lean Tissue Mass
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24
Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) lean tissue mass in all four extremities
Baseline to Week 24
Change in Cross-Sectional Area of Trunk and Thigh Muscles
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24
Computed tomography (CT) cross-sectional area of trunk and thigh muscles
Baseline to Week 24
Change in Exercise Adherence
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24
FitBit (step count heart rate time), exercise log (movement type, repetitions, load, rate of perceived exertion)
Baseline to Week 24
Change in Tissue Density of Trunk and Thigh Muscles
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24
Computed tomography (CT) attenuation of trunk and thigh muscles
Baseline to Week 24
Change in Visceral Adipose Tissue Cross-Sectional Area
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24
Computed tomography (CT) cross-sectional area at L4
Baseline to Week 24
Change in Frailty Phenotype
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24
Fried Frailty Phenotype score, scored from 0 to 5 with higher indicating worse
Baseline to Week 24
Change in Quality of Life
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24
36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), scored from 0 to 100 with higher indicating better
Baseline to Week 24
Change in Exercise Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24
Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale, scored from 0 to 100 with higher indicating better
Baseline to Week 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lindsay T. Fourman, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Kristine M. Erlandson, MD, University of Colorado, Denver

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 10, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 16, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 12, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 12, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Frailty

Clinical Trials on Exercise

Subscribe