Feasibility Testing a Meditation App for Professionals Working With Youth in the Legal System

May 4, 2026 updated by: Ashley D Kendall, University of Illinois at Chicago

Feasibility Trial of a Mindfulness-based mHealth Intervention to Mitigate the Effects of Chronic Workplace Stress Among Juvenile Justice Officers

This feasibility clinical trial aims to assess the feasibility of implementing a 1-month app-based meditation program with officers in the juvenile legal system and other professionals working directly with legal-involved youth.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Professionals working with legal-involved youth experience high levels of depression, anxiety, and workplace burnout. Mindfulness meditation targets emotion regulation-which appears to be a common mechanism underlying depression, anxiety, and burnout-and it can be effectively delivered via smartphone app. This project will assess the feasibility of implementing a 1-month app-based meditation program with officers and other professionals working with legal-involved youth. The findings are intended to inform the development of a future, fully-powered hybrid effectiveness-implementation randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

57

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • University of Illinois Chicago

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Currently working with youth in the juvenile legal system or related juvenile services and programming
  • English speaking
  • Able to understand and provide consent
  • At least 18 years old
  • Have an Android or Apple smartphone

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Action In Mindfulness (AIM)+
Participants randomized to the intervention arm will receive the AIM+ mindfulness meditation app.
AIM+ is a smartphone-based app that teaches mindfulness meditation to professionals working with legal-involved youth over a 30-day "path." Each day of the path consists of a brief (approximately 5- to 10-minute) audio-guided meditation practice, with brief videos interspersed to illustrate key concepts and promote engagement. In addition to the 30 daily path files, users have access to a menu of "to go" audio-guided meditation practices that they can use as relevant to their workday (e.g., for professionals to listen to before attending a meeting). AIM+ also includes a menu of audio-guided meditation practices that officers can share with the youth on their caseloads (e.g., for youth to listen to before attending court).
Active Comparator: Resource+
Participants randomized to the active control arm will receive the Resource+ smartphone-based program.
Resource+ is a 30-day smartphone-based program that includes information on local and national resources that professionals can use to learn about organizations and services available to youth with whom they work.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
App adherence
Time Frame: 1 month
Days of objective app usage
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptability
Time Frame: 1 month
Measured by Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM). This scale measures acceptability using 4 items, each item rated on a 5-point scale and averaged to yield total scale scores between 1 and 5; higher scores indicate greater acceptability.
1 month
Appropriateness
Time Frame: 1 Month
Measured with the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM). This scale measures appropriateness using 4 items, each item rated on a 5-point scale and averaged to yield total scale scores between 1 and 5; higher scores indicate greater appropriateness.
1 Month
Feasibility of App Implementation
Time Frame: 1 month
Measured with the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM). This scale measures feasibility using 4 items, each item rated on a 5-point scale and averaged to yield total scale scores between 1 and 5; higher scores indicate greater feasibility.
1 month
Usability
Time Frame: 1 month
Measured with the System Usability Scale (SUS). This scale measures the usability of products and designs, specifically effectiveness, efficiency, and user satisfaction using 10 items, each item is rated on a 5-point scale; items calculated to produce a total score between 0 and 100; higher scores generally indicate greater usability.
1 month
Satisfaction with intervention
Time Frame: 1 month
Measured with the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8). This scale measures satisfaction using 8 items, each item is rated on a 4-point scale; total sum scores range from 8 to 32; higher scores indicate higher satisfaction.
1 month
Penetration
Time Frame: 1 and 6 month

Measured via objective app analytics.

  • App analytics track referrals to our clinical trials made by participants through their study app to (a) other officers and (b) youth in the legal system.
  • App analytics track the use by participants of files from their study app that are intended to be shared with youth (i.e., meditation practices to play with youth in the AIM+ app, or resources to be shared with youth in the Resource+ app).
1 and 6 month

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anxiety
Time Frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 months
Measured with the PROMIS Anxiety scale. This scale measures anxiety symptoms over the past week using a computer adaptive test/item bank administers of to 12 items, each rated on a 5-point scale; integrated adaptive scoring yields a T-score and standard error (SE); higher scores indicating more anxiety symptoms.
baseline, 1 month, 6 months
Depression
Time Frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 months
Measured with the PROMIS Depression Scale. This scale measures depression symptoms over the past week using a computer adaptive test/item bank administers of to 12 items, each rated on a 5-point scale; integrated adaptive scoring yields a T-score and standard error (SE); higher scores indicating more depression symptoms.
baseline, 1 month, 6 months
Workplace burnout
Time Frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 months

Measured with the Maslach Burnout Inventory General (MBI-G). This measure contains three scales measuring emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment.

  • The 9-item Emotional Exhaustion (EE) scale assesses feelings of being emotionally overextended and exhausted by one's work, with items rated on a 7-point scale; sum scores range from 0-54; higher scores indicate greater degrees of experienced burnout.
  • The 5-item Depersonalization (DP) scale measures an unfeeling and impersonal response toward recipients of one's service, care, treatment, or instruction, with items rated on a 7-point scale; sum scores range from 0-30; Higher scores correspond to greater degrees of experienced burnout.
  • The 8-item Personal Accomplishment (PA) scale assesses feelings of competence and successful achievement in one's work with people, with items rated on a 7-point scale; sum scores range from 0-48; lower scores correspond to greater degrees of experienced burnout.
baseline, 1 month, 6 months
Perceived stress
Time Frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 months
Measured with the Perceived Stress Scale. This scale measures perception of stress over the past month, i.e. the degree to which situations in one's life are appraised as stressful, using 10-items each rated on a 5-point scale; total sum scores range from 0-40, with higher scores indicate more perceived stress.
baseline, 1 month, 6 months
Anger
Time Frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 months
Measured with the PROMIS Short Form v1.1 Anger 5a scale. This scale measures anger over the past 7 days using 5 items, each item rated on a 5-point scale; integrated scoring yields a T-score and standard error (SE), with higher scores indicating more anger.
baseline, 1 month, 6 months
Sleep disturbance
Time Frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 months
Measured with the PROMIS Short Form v1.0 Sleep Disturbance. This scale measures sleep disturbance over the past 7 days using 8 items, each item rated on a 5-point scale; integrated scoring yields a T-score and standard error (SE); higher scores indicate more sleep disturbance.
baseline, 1 month, 6 months
Alcohol use
Time Frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 months
Measured with the PROMIS Short Form v1.0 Alcohol Use 7a. This scale measures alcohol consumption, cravings, or difficulty controlling drinking over the past 30 days using 7 items, each item rated on a 5-point scale; integrated scoring yields a T-score and standard error (SE); higher scores indicate more alcohol consumption, cravings, or difficulty controlling drinking.
baseline, 1 month, 6 months
Mindfulness
Time Frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 months
Measured with the Five Facets of Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ-15). This scale measures mindfulness with subscales for observing, describing, acting with awareness, non-judging, and non-reactivity using 15 items, each item rated on a 5-point scale; total sum scores range from 15-75; higher scores indicate higher levels of mindfulness.
baseline, 1 month, 6 months
Regulation of negative mood states
Time Frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 months
Measured with the Negative Mood Regulation (NMR) Scale. This scale measures regulation of negative mood states using 14 items, each item rated on a 5-point scale; averaged to yield total scale scores between 1 and 5; higher scores indicate a strong belief that one can alter negative moods.
baseline, 1 month, 6 months
Resilience
Time Frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 months
Measured with the Brief Resilience Scale. This scale measures resilience, i.e. adaptation, thriving, and resistance to illness using 6 items, each item rated on a 5-point scale; averaged to yield total scale scores between 1 and 5; higher scores indicate more resilience.
baseline, 1 month, 6 months
Attentional control
Time Frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 months
Measured with the Attention Control Scale (ATTC). This scale measures two major components of attention (attention focusing and attention shifting) and consists of 20 items that are rated on a four-point Likert scale from 1 (almost never) to 4 (always); some items are reverse coded and scale scores are calculated as the sum of respective items; higher scores indicate greater attention control.
baseline, 1 month, 6 months
Current positive and negative mood states
Time Frame: baseline, 1 month
Measured with the International Positive Affect Negative Affect Schedule Short Form (I-PANAS-SF). This scale measures positive and negative affect, with subscales for positive and negative affect, using 10 items, each item rated on a 5-point scale; sum scores range from 5 to 25; higher scores indicate greater tendency to experiences positive or negative mood, respectively.
baseline, 1 month
Current attentional control
Time Frame: baseline, 1 month
Measured using 2 items asking about trouble focusing and distraction in the past 3 hours, rated on a scale of 1 (never) to 6 (almost always); items are reverse-coded and averaged to form a composite representing momentary attentional control; higher scores indicate greater attentional control.
baseline, 1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 21, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 12, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 12, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified data may be placed in one or more electronic databases which could be used for other research studies

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data sharing will generally coincide with publication of the study's main findings and is intended to take place within 1 year after acceptance of the primary manuscripts.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

To be determined

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Action In Mindfulness (AIM)+

Subscribe