Effect of the Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Standard Glycemic Control in Hospitalized Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

September 18, 2024 updated by: Olga Gonzalez Albarran, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon

Effect of the Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Standard Glycemic Control for Insulin Therapy Adjustment and Decision Making in Noncritical Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Hospitalized in Medical and Surgical Wards.

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a common pathology in hospitalized patients and is associated with multiple comorbidities. Moreover, it is widely known that glycemic excursions increase hospital stay, infections, morbidity and mortality. Likewise, asymptomatic hypoglycemia and stress hyperglycemia in hospitalized patients is more frequent due to intercurrent pathology, medication, alteration of counter-regulatory hormones. Therefore, the use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems would be very useful as it allows early recognition of glycemic excursions and thus improve the management of insulin therapy. The primary objective is to demonstrate the increase in time in range (TIR) with the use of CGM for insulin therapy adjustment in hospitalized patients with T2D during their admission. The investigators randomized, parallel group, 2-arm, 40 participants; 20 in each group, patients with diagnosis of T2D prior to admission.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Over the past few decades advances in diabetes technology have revolutionized patient care and metabolic control. The use of CGM has demonstrated substantial benefits on glycemic control in ambulatory patients compared to standard capillary blood glucose (CG) monitoring. However, in hospitalized patients, limitations on its use persist due to the lack of standardization of the data provided by CGM.

The use of CG has been the mainstay for monitoring and adjusting the treatment of hospitalized patients with diabetes. In the management for inpatients this test is commonly performed 3 to 4 times a day. However, this provides significant limitations due to its intermittent nature and the associated time burden for hospital nursing and ancillary staff for its determination.

Several studies have demonstrated that CGM detects more hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia in critically ill and non-critically ill patients. These studies have provided important information on patterns of glycemic control, with emphasis on early detection of glycemic excursions. However, there is still a need for further research to determine the efficacy of their use in glycemic adjustment, reliability in the hospital setting, and standardized protocols for their implementation and decision-making.

HYPOTHESIS The use of CGM allows an increase in TIR and improves the detection of clinically significant hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia in patients with T2D hospitalized on basal-bolus insulin therapy versus standard CG.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Madrid, Spain, 28007
        • Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Over 18 years old
  • Admitted to medical or surgical wards with an expected hospitalization duration of more than 72 hours
  • Requiring basal-bolus insulin therapy during hospitalization.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women
  • Severe mental illnesses
  • Chronic use of high doses of ascorbic acid (equivalent to more than 500mg/day)
  • Patients hospitalized in Intensive Care Units
  • Severe cognitive impairment
  • Prior outpatient CGM use
  • Refusal of informed consent
  • Patients on prolonged absolute diets or receiving artificial nutrition

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Decision making guided by CGM
Hospitalized patients with T2D in non-critical medical and surgical wards. The participants use FreeStyle 2-CGM and therapeutic decisions will be made based on CGM and GC parameters; with the presence of alarms for hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia activated for timely action. Blinded will be applied to patients; while the data will be open to the physicians in charge of the research in order to make daily modifications of insulin therapy. The CG controls will be of 6 points (before each meal and two hours after meals) with a standard Abbott FreeStyle Optium Neo glucometer. Basal-bolus scheme with basal insulin Glargine U-100 and prandial insulin Aspart will be used. Daily adjustments will be made based on protocol based of our department according to the international guidelines and previous research
Patients use FSL2 and a smartphone. Libreview app will be used to assess interstitial glucose, alarms, and trend arrows, and LibreLinkUp app for research team. Concurrently, CG will be performed using the FreeStyle Optium Neo glucometer from Abbott. The nursing staff will be trained to manage and respond to alarms and trend arrows according to established protocols. The basal insulin adjustment protocol establishes with fasting and premeal targets between 140-180 mg/dL. For prandial insulin, corrective guidelines set according to each patient sensitivity factor, with additional adjustments for the intervention group based on trend arrows. The hypoglycemia alarm sets below 85 mg/dL. If activated, nursing staff will confirm the value via CG. If values are below 70 mg/dL, follow hypoglycemia protocol and if below 100 mg/dL with a descending trend arrow, 15 grams of slow-acting carbs. The hyperglycemia alarm will be set above 300 mg/dL and nurse inform investigators to make decisions.
Other Names:
  • CGM
No Intervention: Decision making guided by CG
Hospitalized patients with T2D admitted in non-critical medical and surgical wards. The participants use FreeStyle 2-CGM with deactivated alarms. Blind will be applied for patients, nurses and physicians in charge of the investigation. Concomitant 6-point CG controls will be performed (before each meal and two hours after meals) with Abbott FreeStyle Optium Neo glucometer. Insulin therapy adjustments will be carried out by GC only. The CGM values in this group will be evaluated a posteriori. Basal-bolus schedule with basal insulin Glargine U-100 and prandial insulin Aspart will be used. Daily adjustments will be made based on protocols of our department according to the international guidelines.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The primary objective is to demonstrate the increase in TIR with the use of CGM for insulin therapy adjustment in hospitalized patients with T2D during their admission.
Time Frame: The days of sensor use during hospitalization (from 3 to 14 days).
-Time in range (TIR) reported at the end of sensor use: results will be expressed in percentages and levels greater than 70% will be considered good glycemic control.
The days of sensor use during hospitalization (from 3 to 14 days).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 10, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 5, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

September 23, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Time Frame

1 year

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

1 year

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus Type 2

Clinical Trials on Experimental (Decision making guided by CGM)

Subscribe