Shared Decision Making With Breast Cancer Patients

October 31, 2023 updated by: Vejle Hospital

Shared Decision Making With Breast Cancer Patients Offered Adjuvant Radiotherapy

The aim of this project is to elucidate whether the use of shared decision making will influence patient engagement in the decision making process about adjuvant radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery for local breast cancer or early stages of local breast cancer.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The risk of recurrence of breast cancer is lowered by adjuvant medical treatment as well as by radiotherapy (RT). On the other hand, all adjuvant treatments involve a risk of side effects; some are acute and transient while others are long-term. Considering the well-known side effects of irradiation, it seems appropriate to involve patients in the decision on whether to receive irradiation.

In the shared decision making (SDM) process clinicians and patients work together to make appropriate health decisions based on clinical evidence and the patient's informed preferences. A patient decision aid (PtDA) is instrumental in the SDM process.

This study is a multicenter, national trial randomizing doctors to either use or not use SDM and a PtDA when informing the patients about benefits and risks of receiving adjuvant radiotherapy.

It is not expected that significantly less patients will receive radiotherapy as a consequence of SDM. The primary aim of the study is to evaluate whether patient engagement in decision making is affected by SDM and the use of an in-consultation PtDA.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

678

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Aalborg, Denmark
        • Aalborg Hospital
      • Aarhus, Denmark
        • Aarhus University Hospital
      • Copenhagen, Denmark
        • Rigshospitalet
      • Herlev, Denmark
        • Herlev University Hospital
      • Næstved, Denmark
        • Sjaellands University Hospital
      • Odense, Denmark
        • Odense University Hospital
      • Vejle, Denmark
        • Vejle Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically verified breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ breast cancer
  • Candidate for adjuvant radiotherapy Danish Breast Cancer Group type F after breast-conserving surgery for T1-2, N0-Nmi, M0 disease according to national guidelines.
  • Signed confirmation of participation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bilateral breast cancer or suspicion of disseminated cancer
  • Unable to understand the information, the planned treatment or follow-up for any reason.
  • Earlier radiotherapy towards the thoracic region.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm A: Shared decision making
Patients will be informed by a doctor randomized to practice shared decision making and use the in-consultation PtDA during the consultation on adjuvant radiotherapy.
After having received training in SDM, the doctor will practice SDM supported by an in-consultation PtDA during the consultation with the participant.
No Intervention: Arm B: Usual practice
Patients will be informed by a doctor randomized to inform about adjuvant radiotherapy according to usual practice.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participant engagement in the decision making process as measured by the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire 9.
Time Frame: Within one week after the consultation
Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 100. The higher the value the more patient engagement.
Within one week after the consultation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The doctor's perception of patient engagement in the decision making process as measured by the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire doctor 9
Time Frame: Within one week after the consultation
Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 100. The higher the value the more patient engagement.
Within one week after the consultation
The participant's fear of cancer recurrence as measured by the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Short form Questionnaire
Time Frame: Within one week after the consultation and again after six months
Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 36. The higher the value the more fear of recurrence.
Within one week after the consultation and again after six months
The participant's engagement in the decision making process as measured by the Shared Decision Making Process 4 questionnaire
Time Frame: Within one week after the consultation
Minimum score: 0. Maximum score: 4. The higher the score the more patient engagement.
Within one week after the consultation
The participant's effectiveness in decision making as measured by the Decisional Conflict Scale questionnaire
Time Frame: Before (12 items) and within one week after the consultation (all 16 items)
Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 100. The higher the value the more effective decision making.
Before (12 items) and within one week after the consultation (all 16 items)
The participant's regret of the treatment decision as measured by the Decision Regret Scale questionnaire
Time Frame: Six months after the consultation
Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 100. The higher the value the more regret.
Six months after the consultation
The participant's engagement in the decision making process as measured by the CollaboRATE questionnaire
Time Frame: Within one week after the consultation
Minimum score: 0. Maximum score: 9. The higher the value the more patient engagement.
Within one week after the consultation
The participant's quality of life as measured by the EORCT QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) questionnaire, only question 29 + 30
Time Frame: Six months
Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 100. The higher the value the more quality of life.
Six months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Karina D Steffensen, Professor, Vejle Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Stine R Sondergaard, M.D., Vejle Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 4, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 25, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 26, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 1, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • DBCG RT SDM

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Shared decision making supported by an in-consultation patient decision aid

3
Subscribe