Supporting Decision Making for Musculoskeletal Preference-Sensitive Care

August 26, 2013 updated by: Health Dialog

A Prospective, Randomized Trial to Assess the Impact of Decision Aids and Health Coaching on Health Care Costs, Surgery Rates, and Decision Quality for Individuals At Risk for Musculoskeletal Preference-Sensitive Surgical Decisions

The purpose of this study is to compare condition oriented whole person Health Coaching along with the provision of decision aids to decision aids without condition oriented Health Coaching to neither condition oriented health coaching nor decision aids on medical cost, preference sensitive surgeries and measures of subject knowledge, decision process and decision quality.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

9925

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02109
        • Health Dialog

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants in two large, commercial Blue Cross and/or Blue Shield branded insurance products with eligibility for Health Dialog services
  • Identified by distinct Health Dialog proprietary models for risk of lumbar back, knee or hip surgeries
  • Selected by simple randomization for inclusion in an interactive voice response (IVR) administered screening survey
  • Participated in an IVR-administered screener survey and responded affirmatively to questions on pain for any one of the three conditions, any current or planned treatment for the conditions, and responded negatively to having had a condition specific surgery within the past six months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • People under 18 years of age at time of identification for the IVR filtering survey, approximately 6 weeks prior to the start of the study
  • People with invalid phone numbers or invalid mailing addresses based on automated review of those fields
  • People for whom Health Dialog has information of a request for no IVR, no Health Coach outreach, or mailings prior to the start of the study
  • People with claims based indication of spinal stenosis prior to the start of the study
  • People who have been targeted for any IVR outreach within 180 days of the initiation of the IVR filtering survey
  • People who have a Health Coach communication record, as documented in the Health Coaching application within 90 days of the start of the study
  • Any members of households who have a household member already selected for inclusion in the study
  • People for whom there is claims evidence of any one of the targeted surgeries prior the start of the study
  • People with no eligibility for services through insurer after the start of the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Decision Aid with Health Coaching
Subjects are mailed decision aid digital video discs (DVDs) and pamphlets regarding lumbar back, hip osteoarthritis or knee osteoarthritis.
Subjects are direct dial attempted by Health Coaches up to three attempts. If contacted, Health Coaches tailor support around health matters of importance to the subjects and to help individuals become active participants in their treatment plans, and make more informed decisions in consort with their health care providers. The number of total contacts is determined by mutual agreement between the subject and the Health Coach. Health Coaches may provide additional educational materials and resources.
Experimental: Decision Aid only
Subjects are mailed decision aid digital video discs (DVDs) and pamphlets regarding lumbar back, hip osteoarthritis or knee osteoarthritis.
No Intervention: No condition specific support

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Medical Costs Per Member Per Month
Time Frame: 6 months
total medical cost paid for covered services for the subject for six months after initiation of the study. This total includes all places of service and types of covered services, including inpatient, outpatient and pharmacy.
6 months
Total Medical Costs That Can be Impacted Per Member Per Month
Time Frame: 6 months

total medical cost paid for covered services for the subject for six months after initiation of the study. This total includes all places of service and types of covered services, including inpatient, outpatient and pharmacy.

Costs that cannot be impacted include: Costs related to Trauma and Accident, Psychiatric/Substance Abuse, Malignant Neoplasm, Maternity and Childbirth excluded

6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of Targeted Conditions Surgeries
Time Frame: 6 months
rate of any one claims based instance of lumbar back, hip repair, hip replacement, knee repair, or knee replacement surgery
6 months
Concordance
Time Frame: 6 months
Self-reported consistency of choices with goals and concerns--extent to which the treatment choices subjects make are or are not consistent with the issues they state are priorities including avoiding surgery, reducing pain and regaining function
6 months
Quality of Decision Making Process
Time Frame: 6 months
Self-reported measure of the extent to which subject interactions with providers involve discussions of the pros and cons of treatment options and provide an opportunity for subjects to have input into the decisions.
6 months
Knowledge
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Subject self-reported knowledge about the risks and benefits of surgical options and likely outcomes with and without surgical interventions.Knowledge score calculated (score of 0-5, counting number of correct answers) for every respondent who completes at least 3 of the 5 items.
12 weeks
Decision Conflict
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Self-reported measure of the extent to which subjects feel comfortable, supported and confident in choosing one treatment approach over others. Score computed on a scale of 1-3, where 1 = 'No', 2='Yes, somewhat', 3='Yes, completely' (3 indicates less conflict, 1 indicates most conflict) on a 4 item survey question set- asks whether respondents feel sure, have enough support, know and are clear about benefits and risks of treatment options.
12 weeks
Decision Satisfaction
Time Frame: 6 months
Self-reported measure of subject satisfaction with decision as measured retrospectively, including how subjects feel their decision worked out and whether or not they would make the same decision again.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David R Veroff, MPP, Health Dialog Services Corporation

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

April 29, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 30, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2013

Last Verified

August 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SDMBKH-HD012011

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Provision of condition specific shared decision making (SDM) aids only

3
Subscribe