Upper Limb Robot-Assisted Therapy in Patients with Guillain-Barré Syndrome (RAUL-Project)

March 13, 2025 updated by: I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia

Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy for Upper Limb Functional Recovery in Patients with Guillain-Barré Syndrome: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Guillain-Barré Syndrome is an immune-mediated polyradiculoneuropathy, with around 100,000 new cases reported worldwide annually.

The aim of this double-blind randomized controlled trial with a SHAM control group is to evaluate the effects of robot-assisted therapy, integrated with conventional therapy, on upper limb motor recovery in patients with GBS.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Guillain-Barré Syndrome is a leading cause of acute flaccid paralysis, presenting with limb weakness and hyporeflexia or areflexia. Guillain-Barré Syndrome is an immune-mediated polyradiculoneuropathy, with around 100,000 new cases reported worldwide annually. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a robot-assisted rehabilitation treatment for upper limb motor recovery in patients with Guillain-Barré Syndrome. A double-blind randomized trial will be conducted, where the experimental group will undergo actual robotic rehabilitation sessions, while the control group will perform sessions in which the robot will carry out simple mobilization, comparable to traditional interventions. This approach will help maintain participant blinding. Patients will be evaluated before and after treatment, and with two follow-up assessments 60 and 90 days after therapy initiation. Evaluations will include muscle recruitment and autonomy in daily living activities.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

62

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Lazio
      • Rome, Lazio, Italy, 00179
        • IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosis of Guillan-Barré Syndrome;
  2. UL motor impairment (0-4 in the Medical Research Council scale);
  3. sub-acute phase (until 180 days);
  4. Patients able to maintain the sitting position.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Concomitant neurological, orthopedic, metabolic, and oncological diseases;
  2. Cognitive impairment assessed with the Mini Mental State Examination (score under 24 points);
  3. Visual deficit;
  4. Hearing disorders.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active-assisted therapy with an upper limb robotic exoskeleton

Patients will receive upper limb neurorehabilitation training using a robotic exoskeleton administered by the therapist. The assistance provided by the device is adjusted based on the maximum force (as a percentage of the upper limb's weight) the robot needs to exert to assist the patient's movements. The computer-robot interface is designed to offer various exergames that require specific upper limb movements.

All movements performed by the patient using the exoskeleton will provide immediate audiovisual feedback on the computer screen. The training will consist of 20 sessions, with five 45-minute sessions per week.

Patients will undergo 20 session of 45 minutes each with an exoskeleton for upper limb rehabilitation. The assistance provided by the device is adjusted based on the maximum force (as a percentage of the upper limb's weight) the robot needs to exert to assist the patient's movements. Each session will include exercises designed to improve the range of motion (ROM) of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and enhance hand coordination. The training parameters, such as difficulty level, duration, and visual stimuli, will be adjusted based on the patient's residual abilities. The selected exercises may involve movements of a single joint along one axis, combined movements of a single joint around 2 or 3 axes, selective exercises for the opening and closing hand, or multi-joint exercises. All exercises will be realized with audiovisual feedback.
Active Comparator: Passive mobilization with an upper limb robotic exoskeleton
Patients will undergo a neurorehabilitation intervention with a SHAM treatment under the guidance of the experimental therapist.
Patients will undergo 20 session of 45 minute of a neurorehabilitation intervention with a SHAM treatment under the guidance of the experimental therapist. This will involve passive mobilization using the exoskeleton for the upper limb, without any audiovisual feedback. They will not realize any active movement during the training.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale for Upper Extremity (FMAUE)
Time Frame: Baseline (t0); 30 days (t1); 60 days (t2); 90 days (t3).
THE FMAUE will be used to assess the change in the motor and sensory functions of the upper limb. The FMAUE included five domains: motor functioning, sensitivity, coordination, range of motion and pain. The score ranging from 0 to 66 points, a higher score corresponds to a better function of the upper limb.
Baseline (t0); 30 days (t1); 60 days (t2); 90 days (t3).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Time Frame: Baseline (t0); 30 days (t1); 60 days (t2); 90 days (t3).
The SF-36 will be used to assess the change in health-related quality of life. The SF-36 is organized into 8 different domains that are divided into physical components (Physical functioning, limitations due to physical problems, bodily pain and general perceptions of health status) and mental components (Social functioning, general mental health, limitations due to emotional problems and vitality). Each of the 8 domain scores, added together, is linearly transformed on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 equals negative health and 100 equals positive health.
Baseline (t0); 30 days (t1); 60 days (t2); 90 days (t3).
modified Barthel Index (mBI)
Time Frame: Baseline (t0); 30 days (t1); 60 days (t2); 90 days (t3).
The mBI will be used to assess the change in the autonomy of patients during their activities of daily living. This scale has a score ranging from 0 to 100 points, a higher score corresponds to a better performance in the activities of daily living.
Baseline (t0); 30 days (t1); 60 days (t2); 90 days (t3).
ABILHAND
Time Frame: Baseline (t0); 30 days (t1); 60 days (t2); 90 days (t3).
The ABILHAND will be used to assess manual dexterity. The ABILHAND is a questionnaire-based assessment tool that measures the difficulty a patient perceives in using their hands to perform manual operations and activities in daily living. It assesses upper limb functionality. It has nonlinear logit values ranging from 1.72 to -2.18.
Baseline (t0); 30 days (t1); 60 days (t2); 90 days (t3).
The Medical Research Council scale (MRC)
Time Frame: Baseline (t0); 30 days (t1); 60 days (t2); 90 days (t3).
The MRC will be used to assess muscle strength. The score ranges from 0 to 5 where 0 equals no muscle recruitment and 5 normal muscle force.
Baseline (t0); 30 days (t1); 60 days (t2); 90 days (t3).
The nine hole peg test (NHPG).
Time Frame: Baseline (t0); 30 days (t1); 60 days (t2); 90 days (t3).
The NHPG will be used to assess fine manual dexterity. The NHPT consists of a square board with 9 pegs. At one end of the board are holes to insert the pegs, and at the other end is a shallow round plate to store the extracted pegs. The NHPT is administered by asking the patient to take the pegs from a container, one by one, and insert them into the holes on the board, as quickly as possible.
Baseline (t0); 30 days (t1); 60 days (t2); 90 days (t3).
Grip strength
Time Frame: Baseline (t0); 30 days (t1); 60 days (t2); 90 days (t3).
Grip strength will be assessed using a manual digital dynamometer. The maximum strength of the whole hand will be recorded for three times without feedback (with the patient sitting with his back to the monitor).
Baseline (t0); 30 days (t1); 60 days (t2); 90 days (t3).

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Time Frame: T0 (Baseline)

MMSE is a widely used psychometric tool in clinical settings to assess cognitive function. It is employed to detect cognitive impairments, monitor the progression of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer disease, and evaluate the severity of cognitive decline.

The test consists of a series of questions and tasks that assess various cognitive domains, including orientation in time and space, memory, attention, language, and the ability to follow simple commands.

T0 (Baseline)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Alex Martino Cinnera, PhD, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation
  • Study Chair: Diego Piatti, BSc, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation
  • Study Director: Laura Casagrande Conti, MSc, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation
  • Study Director: Martina D Arienzo, BSc, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 30, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 1, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Time Frame

2024/10/01

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

on resonable request to the study' PI

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Guillain Barré Syndrome

Subscribe