- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06627673
MultiCenter IDE Study of the PEEK-OPTIMA™ Femoral Component vs a CoCr Alloy TKA Femoral Component of Similar Design
MultiCenter Prospective Parallel Registry Controlled Investigational Device Exemption Clinical Study to Determine Non-Inferiority of the PEEK-OPTIMA™ Femoral Component Versus a CoCr Alloy Femoral Component of Similar Design for TKA
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The purpose of this investigational device exemption (IDE) study is to monitor the performance (safety and efficacy) of the Maxx Orthopedics, Freedom Total Knee® System, with a femoral component of similar design, manufactured from polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK).
PEEK is a high-performance, engineering thermoplastic characterized by an unusual combination of properties. These properties range from high temperature performance to mechanical strength and excellent chemical resistance.
The PEEK-OPTIMA® femoral component, is an investigational device and is the subject of this study approved for IDE by the Federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Maxx Orthopedics, Freedom Total Knee System is used with instrumentation to assist with surgery of the knee. The Maxx Orthopedics, Freedom Total Knee System implants are approved by the FDA for use in the United States and is not investigational.
All patients will receive the Freedom Total Knee System with the PEEK femoral component. Patient / study participents' records will be reviewed for identification of any and all complications, post-operative care, component safety and efficacy, and if re-operation is needed.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Corey Perine, BS, MBA
- Phone Number: 215-432-4323
- Email: corey.perine@maxxortho.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Nach Dave, M.S., R.Ph.
- Phone Number: 732-718-1385
- Email: nach.dave@maxxortho.com
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male and female subjects 18 years of age or older.
- Subjects with a primary diagnosis of end-stage symptomatic unilateral primary knee osteoarthritis.
- Subjects with a pre-operative Knee Society Score (KSS) Knee score of >25 and <75.
- Subjects who, in the opinion of the Investigator, can understand this clinical investigation, co-operate with the investigational procedures and are willing to return to the hospital for all the required post-operative follow-ups.
- Subjects who can give voluntary, written informed consent to participate in this clinical investigation and from whom consent has been obtained.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subjects who, in the opinion of the Investigator, have an existing condition that would compromise their participation and follow-up in this clinical investigation.
- Subjects who are known drug or alcohol abusers or with psychological disorders that could affect follow-up care or treatment outcomes.
- Subjects who have participated in a clinical study with an investigational product in the last 6 months.
- Subjects with other significant disabling problems from the muscular-skeletal system other than in the knees (i.e.: muscular dystrophy, polio, neuropathic joints).
- Subjects with known osteoporosis and/or previous history of fracture related to osteoporosis.
- Subjects with a current or active history of malignancy, active or suspected infection, Paget's disease, renal osteodystrophy, immunologically suppressed, rheumatoid arthritis, sickle cell anemia, and systemic lupus erythematosus.
- Subjects defined by the Investigator as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Grade III or IV.
- Subjects who have a neuromuscular or neurosensory deficit.
- Female subjects who are pregnant or lactating.
- Subjects with an anatomical limb alignment of above 20 degrees varus or valgus.
- Subjects with primary or secondary diagnosis of inflammatory or traumatic arthritis.
- Subjects with a fixed flexion deformity of over 20 degrees.
- Subjects with recurvatum (definition: hyperextension ≥ 5 degrees).
- Subjects who have previously undergone surgery on the indicated knee including total knee arthroplasty, patellofemoral arthroplasty, or unicondylar knee arthroplasty, high tibial osteotomy, ligament reconstruction, fusion, open reduction and internal fixation.
- Subjects that have undergone, or scheduled to undergo, contralateral total knee arthroplasty or unicondylar knee arthroplasty within ±1 year from the study surgical procedure.
- Evidence of active or suspected (systemic or local) infection at time of surgery.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Treatment arm utilizing primary TKA with PEEK femoral component
This study is a single arm, multi-center, prospective IDE trial.
Two hundred (200) patients recruited and consented will receive the PEEK-OPTIMA™ Femoral Component and results will be compared to matched historic controls from the Maxx Orthopedics Freedom Total Knee System product registry (PK-00002 REV-01, WCG IRB# 20241890).
Male and female patients 18 years of age or older with Knee Society Score (KSS) of >25 and <75 will be eligible for enrollment.
|
Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty with a PEEK femoral component
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Original Knee Society Score
Time Frame: 24 months post-treatment.
|
The Knee Society Score rating system was first introduced during the late 1980's and has become the standard clinical evaluation system for reporting results for patients undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty. Most major journals strongly encourage that total knee manuscripts include Knee Society Score rating scores as part of the result section. The Knee Society Score consists of points given for pain, range of motion, and stability. The Function Score consists of points given for the ability to walk on level surfaces, and the ability to ascend and descend stairs, with deductions for the use of external supporting devices. The Knee Society Score is usually reported as the two scores, "Knee Score" and "Function Score," rather than a summation score. The KSS score has a maximum of 100 points for each domain (Knee and Function). |
24 months post-treatment.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Knee Society Score (Knee Scores)
Time Frame: Subject reported outcomes at 3-6 weeks 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months post-treatment
|
The Knee Society Score rating system was first introduced during the late 1980's and has become the standard clinical evaluation system for reporting results for patients undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty. Most major journals strongly encourage that total knee manuscripts include Knee Society Score rating scores as part of the result section. The Knee Society Score consists of points given for pain, range of motion, and stability. The Function Score consists of points given for the ability to walk on level surfaces, and the ability to ascend and descend stairs, with deductions for the use of external supporting devices. The Knee Society Score is usually reported as the two scores, "Knee Score" and "Function Score," rather than a summation score. The KSS score has a maximum of 100 points for each domain (Knee and Function). |
Subject reported outcomes at 3-6 weeks 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months post-treatment
|
|
Knee Society Score (Function Scores)
Time Frame: Subject reported outcomes at 3-6 weeks 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months post-treatment
|
The Knee Society Score rating system was first introduced during the late 1980's and has become the standard clinical evaluation system for reporting results for patients undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty. Most major journals strongly encourage that total knee manuscripts include Knee Society Score rating scores as part of the result section. The Knee Society Score consists of points given for pain, range of motion, and stability. The Function Score consists of points given for the ability to walk on level surfaces, and the ability to ascend and descend stairs, with deductions for the use of external supporting devices. The Knee Society Score is usually reported as the two scores, "Knee Score" and "Function Score," rather than a summation score. The KSS score has a maximum of 100 points for each domain (Knee and Function). |
Subject reported outcomes at 3-6 weeks 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months post-treatment
|
|
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR)
Time Frame: • Subject reported outcomes at 3-6 weeks 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months post-treatment
|
The KOOS-JR is self-administered and assesses three domains: stiffness (1 question), pain (4 questions), function / daily living (2 questions).
The KOOS-JR meets basic criteria of outcome measures and can be used to evaluate the course of knee injury and treatment outcome.
Each item (questions) is coded from 0 to 4. The raw responses are summed (0-28) which is then converted to an interval score based on the KOOS-JR conversion table.
The score is a percentage score from 0 to 100, 0 representing total knee disability and 100 representing perfect knee health.
|
• Subject reported outcomes at 3-6 weeks 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months post-treatment
|
|
The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global-10
Time Frame: • Subject reported outcomes at 3-6 weeks 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months post-treatment
|
The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS Global-10) is a valid and reliable patient assessment and consists of ten (10) items that measure physical health, physical functioning, general mental health, emotional distress, satisfaction with social activities and relationships, ability to carry out usual social activities and roles, pain, fatigue and overall quality of life.
The response options are presented as 5-point (as well as a single 11-point) rating scales.
The results of the questions are used to calculate two summary scores: a Global Physical Health Score and a Global Mental Health score.
These scores are then standardized to the general population, using the "T-Score".
The average "T-Score" for the United States population is 50 points, with a standard deviation of 10 points.
Higher scores indicate a healthier patient.
The PROMIS 10 scores are predictive of healthcare utilization, mortality in general and disease-specific clinical populations.
|
• Subject reported outcomes at 3-6 weeks 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months post-treatment
|
|
Visual-Analog Scale (VAS) score
Time Frame: Subject reported outcomes at 3-6 weeks 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months post-treatment
|
This scale has been designed to give subjective pain information as to the degree of knee pain you the patient is currently experiencing.
VAS scoring is included in the PROMIS GLOBAL-10 assessment and is not necessary to collect a separate assessment.
Applying the VAS, the patient will select a number from 1 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain) that most closely describes their current pain.
|
Subject reported outcomes at 3-6 weeks 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months post-treatment
|
|
Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12)
Time Frame: Subject reported outcomes at 3-6 weeks 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months post-treatment
|
The 12 question Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12) was introduced with the aim of assessing the patients 'joint awareness'.
The authors of the score suggest the "higher the score" is more representative of higher-level function after surgery, as to be able to forget about the joint requires the absence of pain and the ability to perform all desired functional tasks without limitation.
|
Subject reported outcomes at 3-6 weeks 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months post-treatment
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Chair: Asit Shah, MD, PhD, Chief of Orthopedics - Englewood Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Boonstra AM, Schiphorst Preuper HR, Reneman MF, Posthumus JB, Stewart RE. Reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale for disability in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Int J Rehabil Res. 2008 Jun;31(2):165-9. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e3282fc0f93.
- Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Nov;(248):13-4.
- Thomsen MG, Latifi R, Kallemose T, Barfod KW, Husted H, Troelsen A. Good validity and reliability of the forgotten joint score in evaluating the outcome of total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2016 Jun;87(3):280-5. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2016.1156934. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
- Shim J, Hamilton DF. Comparative responsiveness of the PROMIS-10 Global Health and EQ-5D questionnaires in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2019 Jul;101-B(7):832-837. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B7.BJJ-2018-1543.R1.
- Lyman S, Lee YY, Franklin PD, Li W, Cross MB, Padgett DE. Validation of the KOOS, JR: A Short-form Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes Survey. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jun;474(6):1461-71. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4719-1. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
- Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr, Mallory TH. Rapid recovery protocol for peri-operative care of total hip and total knee arthroplasty patients. Surg Technol Int. 2004;13:239-47.
- Jamsen E, Puolakka T, Eskelinen A, Jantti P, Kalliovalkama J, Nieminen J, Valvanne J. Predictors of mortality following primary hip and knee replacement in the aged. A single-center analysis of 1,998 primary hip and knee replacements for primary osteoarthritis. Acta Orthop. 2013 Feb;84(1):44-53. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.752691. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
- Durbhakula SR, L. Restoration of Femoral Condylar Anatomy for Achieving Optimum Functional Expectations: Component Design and Early Results. Recon Review 6(3): 5, 2016
- Durbhakula SD, V.; Durbhakula, N. Restoration of Femoral Condylar Anatomy for Achieving Optimum Functional Expectations: Continuation of an Earlier Study At 5-Year Minimum Follow-Up. Recon Review 9(1): 6, 2019
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PK-00001
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis
-
Istanbul University - CerrahpasaCompletedKnee Osteoarthritis | Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Edin MešanovićCompletedOsteoarthritis | Osteoarthritis of the Knee | Osteoarthritis of Knee | Osteoarthritis of the Knees | Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Knee | Osteoarthritis Knee | Osteoarthritis in the Knee | Osteoarthritis of Knee JointBosnia and Herzegovina
-
Golden Jubilee National HospitalJohnson & Johnson; DePuy OrthopaedicsNot yet recruitingOsteoarthritis | Knee Osteoarthritis | Osteoarthritis (OA) | Osteo Arthritis | Osteoarthritis in the Knee | Osteoarthritis (Knee) | Osteo Arthritis of the KneeUnited Kingdom
-
Dr. David WassersteinSunnybrook Research InstituteRecruitingKnee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA) | Knee Osteoarthritis (OA)Canada
-
LifeBridge HealthMicroPort Orthopedics Inc.; Rubin Institute for Advanced OrthopedicsRecruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Osteoarthritis, Knee | Knee Pain Chronic | Arthropathy of Knee Joint | Knee Disease | Osteoarthritis Knees Both | Osteoarthritis Knee Left | Osteoarthritis Knee RightUnited States
-
Lucas R. Cusumano, MDNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Knee Discomfort | Knee Pain Chronic | Knee Swelling PainUnited States
-
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical UniversityRecruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Knee Osteoarthritis in VarusRussia
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)United States
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityChinese University of Hong Kong; Zhujiang HospitalNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
-
University of MiamiNot yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on Total Knee Arthroplasty
-
Satakunta Central HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
University of PittsburghRecruiting
-
Technische Universität DresdenMathys Ltd BettlachCompletedKnee Osteoarthritis
-
Technische Universität DresdenActive, not recruiting
-
Jesus Moreta SuarezActive, not recruiting
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalUnknownComputer-assisted Navigation Versus Conventional Total Knee ReplacementTaiwan
-
Smith & Nephew, Inc.TerminatedDegenerative Arthritis of KneeUnited States, Australia
-
Istituto Ortopedico RizzoliRecruitingKnee Arthroplasty, TotalItaly
-
Technische Universität DresdenAesculap AGCompletedOsteoarthritis | Metal Ion LevelsGermany
-
University of ConnecticutCompletedOsteo Arthritis Knee | Hip Osteoarthritis | Protein-Energy Malnutrition | Orthopedic | Energy Malnutrition ProteinUnited States