Comparing Optimized Models of Primary And Specialist Services for Palliative Care: Pilot Feasibility Trial

July 23, 2025 updated by: Scott Halpern, University of Pennsylvania
Palliative care (PC) seeks to reduce suffering and improve quality of life for patients with serious illnesses and their families. National guidelines recommend that clinicians either provide palliative care themselves (generalist PC) or consult experts (specialist PC) as a standard part of serious illness care. This feasibility pilot study will be conducted with 6 hospitals at two large U.S. health systems and enroll 540 seriously ill hospitalized patients. Eligibility is determined by a mortality prediction score where enrolled patients have at least a 60% risk of dying within 1 year. Enrollment assessment occurs as close as possible to 36 hours post admission. In this cluster-randomized trial, the 6 hospitals will be randomized to 3 arms: (1) standardized usual care, (2) trained generalist PC, or (3) specialist PC. Generalists are trained using the Center to Advance Palliative Care (CAPC) online trainings. The pilot study will only measure process outcomes to assess the feasibility of a larger clinical trial (e.g., are the interventions working as intended). This pilot feasibility study is the precursor to a much larger pragmatic, hybrid effectiveness-implementation parallel-cluster RCT that will assess the comparative effectiveness of triggering generalist PC and specialist PC on several patient-centered outcome measures.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1208

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Pasadena, California, United States, 91101
        • Kaiser Permanente Southern California
    • Michigan
      • Livonia, Michigan, United States, 48152
        • Trinity Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 years of age or older; AND
  • Predicted 1-year mortality risk of 60% or greater; AND
  • Admitted to a study hospital.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patients who die or have an active or completed discharge order prior to enrollment time

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standardized Usual Care
Active control group, where moderately high-risk patients (e.g., with a 1-year mortality risk between 60% and 94%) will receive usual care. A specialist PC consult is ordered by default for the highest-risk patients (i.e., 1-year mortality risk ≥ 95%), unless clinicians cancel the order.
Moderately high-risk patients (e.g., with a 1-year mortality risk between 60% and 94%) will receive usual care. For very high-risk patients (e.g., with a 1-year mortality risk of ≥ 95%), an EHR-based Our Practice Advisory (OPA) alert on Open Chart informs clinicians when the default order will become active, and how to cancel an order within 24 hours if they elect to do so.
Experimental: Trained Generalist Palliative Care
Generalist clinicians trained in PC domains receive an EHR-based alert to document whether or not they have addressed PC domains for moderately high-risk patients ('accountable justification intervention'). A specialist PC consult is ordered by default for the highest-risk patients unless clinicians cancel the order.
A specialist PC consult is automatically ordered for patients meeting a certain threshold of 1-year mortality risk (dependent on arm). An EHR-based Our Practice Advisory (OPA) alert on Open Chart informs clinicians when the default order will become active, and how to cancel an order within 24 hours if they elect to do so.
An EHR-based Our Practice Advisory alert asks generalist clinicians to self-report whether they have provided primary PC by clicking which of 4 key PC domains they have addressed or to provide a brief justification as to why not.
Experimental: Specialist Palliative Care
A specialist PC consult is ordered by default for all patients with a ≥ 60% 1-year mortality risk ('default order intervention'), unless clinicians cancel the order.
A specialist PC consult is automatically ordered for patients meeting a certain threshold of 1-year mortality risk (dependent on arm). An EHR-based Our Practice Advisory (OPA) alert on Open Chart informs clinicians when the default order will become active, and how to cancel an order within 24 hours if they elect to do so.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Appropriate Firings of All Our Practice Advisory (OPA) Interventions
Time Frame: 36 to 60 hours post admission
Percentage of all Intervention Our Practice Advisory (OPAs) that fired in the correct time window for patients with mortality risk thresholds eligible for each intervention.
36 to 60 hours post admission

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Survey Response Rate at 1 month
Time Frame: Enrollment - 1 month post-discharge
Percentage of 1-month PRO surveys completed by alive patients or their surrogate proxies
Enrollment - 1 month post-discharge
PRO Survey Response Rate at 3 months
Time Frame: Enrollment - 3 months post-discharge
Percentage of 3-month PRO surveys completed by alive patients or their surrogate proxies
Enrollment - 3 months post-discharge
Default Specialist PC Consults
Time Frame: 36 hours to 170 hours post admission
Percentage of default specialist PC orders that resulted in an inpatient PC consult before hospital discharge
36 hours to 170 hours post admission
Default Specialist PC Order Cancellation Rate
Time Frame: 36 hours to 60 hours post admission
Percentage of default specialist PC orders in which a generalist clinician indicated they did not want the order to proceed.
36 hours to 60 hours post admission
Inappropriate Our Practice Advisory (OPA) Firings
Time Frame: 0 to 60 hours post admission
Percentage of all patient encounters in whom at least one Our Practice Advisory (OPA) fired inappropriately. This includes an OPA firing outside the allowed time window on a patient who is eligible, the firing of the wrong OPA on a patient who is eligible (e.g., firing of the Generalist PC OPA for a patient in the Specialist PC arm), and the firing of any OPA on a patient who is ineligible (e.g., who has an inappropriate mortality risk score or active discharge order at the time enrollment eligibility is assessed).
0 to 60 hours post admission
Generalist PC Training Completion
Time Frame: Baseline
Percentage of clinicians eligible for CAPC palliative care training in the Generalist PC arm who complete the 4 required training modules. Partial completion (1-3 required modules) and completion of optional CAPC modules will be secondarily reported.
Baseline
Generalist PC Domain Completion
Time Frame: 36 hours to 60 hours post admission
Percentage of clinicians in the Generalist PC arm who say they are addressing patients' PC needs during the current encounter, and of those, the percentage who document at least 1 of 4 PC Domains in the EHR Our Practice Advisory Alert
36 hours to 60 hours post admission

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Scott Halpern, MD, PhD, University of Pennsylvania
  • Principal Investigator: Katherine Courtright, MD, MS, University of Pennsylvania

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 17, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 4, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 8, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 24, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 100917710
  • PLACER-2022C3-30553 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI))

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Seriously Ill Hospitalized Patients

Clinical Trials on Standardized Usual Care

Subscribe