Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Oblique Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

October 10, 2024 updated by: Michael Fayez Yousef Metias, Helwan University

Evaluation of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Oblique Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Comparative Study

The aim of this work was to compare the effect of using oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane (OSTAP) block and erector spinae plane (ESP) block as a part of multi-modal analgesia technique in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a commonly performed surgery and requires multi-modal analgesia for better control of pain. Untreated post-operative pain has many consequences, including patient dissatisfaction, transition into chronic pain, delayed discharge from the hospital, and increased healthcare costs.

Many inter-fascial plane blocks like oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane (OSTAP) block and recently, erector spinae plane (ESP) block have been utilized as a part of multi modal analgesia technique in many abdominal surgeries.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Cairo
      • Helwan, Cairo, Egypt, 11795
        • Helwan university

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age from 20 to 60 years.
  • Both gender.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I and II physical status.
  • Body mass index (BMI): ≥ 20 kg/m2 and ≤ 35 kg/m2.
  • Underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal.
  • Known sensitivity or contraindication to drugs used in the study (local anesthetics, opioids).
  • History of psychological disorders and/or chronic pain syndrome.
  • Contraindication to regional anesthesia, e.g., local sepsis, pre-existing peripheral neuropathies, and coagulopathy.
  • Severe respiratory disorders such as (severe obstructive pulmonary disease, forced expiratory volume (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC) <50% or severe restrictive pulmonary disease, and adult respiratory distress syndrome).
  • Severe cardiac disorders such as (heart failure).
  • Advanced liver disease (elevated liver enzymes more than 3 folds of normal range).
  • Advanced kidney disease (Decreased creatinine clearance <40 ml/min).
  • Pregnancy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Erector spinae plane block group
Patients received ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block.
Patients received ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block.
Experimental: Oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block group
Patients received ultrasound-guided oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block.
Patients received ultrasound-guided oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Degree of pain intensity
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
The degree of pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Each patient was instructed about postoperative pain assessment with the VAS. VAS(0 represents "no pain" while 10 represents "the worst pain imaginable"). It was assessed at 30 minutes, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 hours postoperatively.
24 hours postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to first rescue analgesia
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Time to first rescue analgesia was assessed from the end of surgery to the first dose of morphine administrated
24 hours postoperatively
Total amount of morphine consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
When a patient complains of pain equivalent to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ≥ 3, rescue analgesia is given in the form of morphine (0.05mg/kg) intravenous increments, as needed.
24 hours postoperatively
Morphine-related side effects
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Morphine-related side effects such as incidence of nausea and vomiting, respiratory depression (respiratory rate < 8 breaths/min), bradycardia (heart rate decreases by > 20% of basal reading), pruritus, and urine retention were recorded.
24 hours postoperatively
Local anesthetics-related side effects
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Local anesthetics-related side effects such as lightheadedness, circumoral numbness, tongue paresthesia, drowsiness, irritability, muscle twitches, convulsions, bradycardia, hypotension (mean arterial blood pressure decreases by > 20% of basal reading), hypoventilation and cardiac arrest were recorded.
24 hours postoperatively
Incidence of adverse effects of the block technique
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Signs of adverse effects of the block techniques, such as local site infection, hematoma formation, bowel perforation, or pneumothorax, were recorded.
24 hours postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 10, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 118-2022

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author after the end of study for one year.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After the end of study for one year.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Clinical Trials on Erector spinae plane block

Subscribe