HAIC Compared With TACE in Huge Hepatocellular Carcinoma

March 21, 2025 updated by: Zhou Qunfang, Sun Yat-sen University

Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Compared With Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolizationin Intermediate-advanced Huge Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Multicenter Retrospective Study

This study intends to compare the efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemical embolization (TACE) with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for patients with intermediate-advanced huge hepatocellular carcinoma.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) are effective and safe for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). For huge HCC (≥10 cm), the prognosis of this high tumor-burden subtype usually indicates poor outcome and big challenge. TACE is difficult to completely embolize all tumor arteries, so patients have limited benefit from pure hepatic artery embolization. At the same time, excessive embolization will lead to massive tumor necrosis in a short time, and inflammatory necrosis factor will enter the blood, resulting in systemic inflammatory response. HAIC have showed good efficacy especially for advanced huge HCC (≥10 cm) complicated with portal vein tumor thrombus and arteriovenous fistula, and HAIC therapy can be performed with better and higher tumor control.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

664

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100853
        • Recruiting
        • Chinese PLA General Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Feng Duan, MD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

This study is a multicenter, observational real-world study to compare the efficacy of HAIC with TACE in advancedhuge hepatocellular carcinoma. This study focused on the management of locoregional therapy . This study will create a database that will provide clinical parameters and outcomes of patients undergoing HIAC and TACE in huge HCC therapy.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Clinical diagnosis of primary HCC.
  2. Age between 18 and 75 years;
  3. The maximum tumor size ≥10 cm;
  4. Intermediate-advanced huge HCC, advanced HCC with PVTT type I-III
  5. limited metastases (≤5).
  6. Child-Pugh class A or B;
  7. Eastern Cooperative Group performance status (ECOG) score of 0-1;
  8. Hemoglobin ≥ 8.5 g/dL Total bilirubin ≤ 30mmol/L Serum albumin ≥ 32 g/L ASL and AST ≤ 5 x upper limit of normal Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x upper limit of normal INR ≤ 1.5 or PT/APTT within normal limits Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >1,500/mm3
  9. Prothrombin time ≤18s or international normalized ratio < 1.7.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. recurrent HCC;
  2. Extrahepatic metastasis >5;
  3. Obstructive PVTT involving mesenteric vena cava (PVTT IV).
  4. Serious medical comorbidities.
  5. Evidence of hepatic decompensation including ascites, gastrointestinal bleeding or hepatic encephalopathy
  6. Eastern Cooperative Group performance status (ECOG) score of ≥2;
  7. Known or suspected allergy to the investigational agents or any agent given in association with this trial.
  8. Cardiac ventricular arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
TACE
TACE procedure was a 2.8-F microcatheter was super-selectively inserted into the tumor feeding artery using the coaxial technique. Then conventional TACE or drug-eluting TACE was used.
TACE was carried out under the guidance of digital subtraction angiography, and hepatic artery angiography was used to assess the location, number, size, and blood supply of the targeted tumor. Then a more selective microcatheter was used to vascularize the tumor. The emulsion of the selected drug and the embolization agents was therefore injected infused into tumor-feeding arteries via the selective microcatheter. A final arteriography confirmed the success of the procedure. The endpoint of the TACE procedure was reached when there was no flow in the tumor-feeding vessels.
HAIC
HIAC was conducted with hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin every 3-4 weeks.
HAIC was carried out under the guidance of digital subtraction angiography, 990and hepatic artery angiography was used to assess the location, number, size, and blood supply of the targeted tumor. Then a more selective microcatheter was used to vascularize the tumor. The FOLFOX regimen was administered via the hepatic artery as follows: 85 or 135 mg/m2 oxaliplatin from hour 0 to 2 on day 1, and 400 mg/m2 leucovorin from hour 2 to 4 on day 1, and 400 mg/m2 fluorouracil bolus at hour 5 on the day 1; and 2400 mg/m2 fluorouracil over 46 h on days 1 and 2. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy administration of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin via the tumor feeding arteries every 4 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective response rate
Time Frame: 6 months
ORR, as determined based on tumor response according to mRECIST, is defined as the proportion of all included patients whose best overall response (BOR) is either a complete response or partial response.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival
Time Frame: 24 months
OS is the length of time from the date of inclusion until death from any cause.
24 months
Progression-Free-Survival
Time Frame: 12 months
Progression was defined as progressive disease by independent radiologic review
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Feng Duan, MD, Chinese PLA General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 12, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

March 26, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on TACE

Subscribe