- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06645795
Robot Asissted Training on Neurodevelopmental Alterations (RAGTNEUDEV)
Effect of Physiotherapy Based on Robot Assited Gait Training on Body Composition and Functional Variables in Pediatric Patient With Neurodevelopmental Alterations: Randomized and Crossover Clinical Trial
The aim of this randomized crossover clinical trial is to determine the effect of robot assisted gait training combined with physiotherapy on body composition and functional variables in a pediatric population with neurodevelopmental disorders.The main questions to answer are:
- Does this treatment improve body composition parameters?
- Does the treatment help maintaining functionality and without causing discomfort or pain?
Participants will perform 2 weekly physiotherapy sessions for 8 weeks, then there will be 4 weeks of washout, afer which each patient will cross over to the other group for 8 more weeks.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Pediatric population with neurodevelopmental disorders, such as cerebral palsy (CP), levels IV-V of the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), do not walk independently due to their significant physical limitations, so their body composition may be altered, which in turn affects their functional level and may lead to the appearance of musculoskeletal complications. Robot assisted gait training (RAGT) offers a new opportunity to improve mobility of pediatric population with CP levels IV-V of GMFCS, although scientific literature is still scarce in this population.
The main aim of this study is to determine the effect of RAGT on body composition and functional variables in a pediatric population with neurodevelopmental disorders. Also to analyze changes in functional, musculoeskeletal, and stress biomarkers variables after the intervention, and to evaluate the cardiorespiratory adaptation to the RAGT.
A convenience sample of 10-12 participants will be selected, who will serve as their own control. It has been taken into account that previous studies conducted on pediatric population with CP this sample size is adequate.
At the beginning of the study, 50% of the participants will be part of the RAGT group, which will perform 2 weekly sessions of RAGT plus conventional therapy; and the other 50% will belong to the conventional physical therapy group. The study consists of phases 1 and 2 of treatment with a washout period between phases: after "phase 1" (8 weeks of therapy in one of the two groups), there will be 4 weeks of washout, after which each patient will cross over to the other group in "phase 2" (for 8 weeks).
Participants will be assessed before phase 1 (T1), after phase 1 (T2), before phase 2 (T3) and after phase 2 (T4).
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
València
-
Valencia, València, Spain, 46010
- University of Valencia
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Pediactric population with neurodevelopmental disorders who have been diagnosed with cerebral palsy.
- With a level IV or V of the GMFCS.
- Adapted to the school environment (> 6 months).
- Unable to stand without support.
- Receiving conventional physiotherapy (> 6 months).
- Receiving a standing program (standing duration at school: at least 45 minutes/day).
- With ankle orthosis.
- Meeting the specific criteria of the exoskeleton manufacturer (ATLAS 2030 Marsibionics https://www.marsibionics.com/): Weight less than 35 kg, Hip width less than 35 cm, Distance from the center of rotation of the hip to that of the knee between 24 and 33 cm, distance from the center of rotation of the knee to that of the ankle between 23 and 32 cm, the ankle can reach close to 90º with or without an orthosis, shoe size less than 33, hip and knee flexion less than or equal to 20º (even after having previously warmed up).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe spinal deformity.
- Severe hip dysplasia.
- Knee and hip flexion greater than 20º.
- Children treated surgically within the 1-year period prior to the evaluation date.
- Skin inflammation and open skin lesions around the trunk or limbs.
- Uncontrolled epilepsy: active epilepsy resistant to medication.
- Pacemaker, defibrillator or osteosynthesis material carriers.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: robot assisted gait training plus conventional physical therapy
Participants will complete 8 weeks of intervention of robot assisted gait training plus conventional physical therapy.
|
Participants will complete 8 weeks of intervention of robot assisted gait training with the ATLAS 2030 exoskeleton (Marsi Bionics) owned by the school which they attend to.
They will have 2 weekly sessions (16 sessions in total) for 4 weeks.
Each session will last up to 1 hour (depending on the child's tolerance) although a minimum of 30 minutes per session and a minimum of 12 sessions will be set in this time.
The training mode will be automatic.
In addition, they will continue to carry out the rest of their usual treatments.
|
|
Active Comparator: Conventional physical therapy
Participants will complete 8 weeks of conventional therapy.
|
Participants will complete 8 weeks of conventional therapy, with 2 sessions per week (16 sessions total).
During the conventional treatment period, participants will continue with the conventional physical therapy they have received thus far.
The content of the usual care treatment does not specifically address gait training, but consists of elements addressing range of motion, tone reduction, balance, activities of daily living, etc.
The conventional intervention may be different for each individual based on their needs (to represent usual care), however, participants will be advised not to change the intervention, type, and frequency during the study.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Body composition, fat %
Time Frame: Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
Measured by bioimpedanciometry (BIA): fat (%).
|
Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
|
Body composition, fat in kg
Time Frame: Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
Measured by bioimpedanciometry (BIA): fat (kg)
|
Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
|
Body composition, lean mass (kg)
Time Frame: Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
Measured by bioimpedanciometry (BIA): lean mass (kg), lean mass (%), total mass (%), dry lean weight (%), Body mass index, and resistance at 50 kHz measured in Ohms
|
Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
|
Body composition, lean mass (%)
Time Frame: Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
Measured by bioimpedanciometry (BIA): lean mass (%).
|
Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
|
Body composition, dry lean weight
Time Frame: Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
Measured by bioimpedanciometry (BIA): dry lean weight (%).
|
Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
|
Bone mineral density.
Time Frame: Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
Measured by ultrasound densitometry.
|
Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Functional and musculoeskeletal assessmement, clinical data.
Time Frame: Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
Measured by the "Cerebral Palsy Follow-Up Program" (CPUP): clinical data.
|
Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
|
Functional and musculoeskeletal assessmement, musculoskeletal history.
Time Frame: Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
Measured by the "Cerebral Palsy Follow-Up Program" (CPUP): musculoskeletal history (previous history of fractures, subluxation or hip dysplasia), technical aids that are currently needed, neurorehabilitation treatments that are currently received at the center.
|
Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
|
Functional and musculoeskeletal assessmement, disability assessment
Time Frame: Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
Measured by the "Cerebral Palsy Follow-Up Program" (CPUP): disability assessment using the Pediatric Evaluation Disability Inventory (PEDI), range of motion of lower limb joints (it will be measured with a goniometer for hip, knee and ankle), spasticity in the muscles of the lower limbs (it will be measured with the modified Asworth Scale), and also the functional capacity using the Functional Mobility Scale (FMS).
|
Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
|
Functional and musculoeskeletal assessmement, range of motion
Time Frame: Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
Measured by the "Cerebral Palsy Follow-Up Program" (CPUP): range of motion of lower limb joints (it will be measured with a goniometer for hip, knee and ankle), spasticity in the muscles of the lower limbs (it will be measured with the modified Asworth Scale), and also the functional capacity using the Functional Mobility Scale (FMS).
|
Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
|
Functional and musculoeskeletal assessmement, spasticity
Time Frame: Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
Measured by the "Cerebral Palsy Follow-Up Program" (CPUP): spasticity in the muscles of the lower limbs (it will be measured with the modified Asworth Scale), and also the functional capacity using the Functional Mobility Scale (FMS).
|
Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
|
Functional and musculoeskeletal assessmement, functional capacity
Time Frame: Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
Measured by the "Cerebral Palsy Follow-Up Program" (CPUP): functional capacity using the Functional Mobility Scale (FMS).
|
Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
|
Anthropometric measurements, weight
Time Frame: Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
Weight (kg)
|
Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
|
Anthropometric measurements, height
Time Frame: Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
Height (cm)
|
Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
|
Anthropometric measurements, BMI
Time Frame: Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
Body Mass Index (kg/m2)
|
Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
|
Anthropometric measurements, circumferences
Time Frame: Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
circumferences of arm, calf, waist and hip (cm)
|
Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
|
Nutritional status
Time Frame: Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
The nutritional status of each participant will be defined by weight-for-age percentiles, height-for-age percentiles, weight-for-height ratio, and BMI-for-age, following WHO growth charts and ASPEN standards, as in previous studies in this population.
|
Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
|
Postural ability
Time Frame: Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
Posture and Postural Ability Scale (PPAS) in sitting, supine and prone.
|
Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
|
Cardio-respiratory measurement, heart rate
Time Frame: Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
Heart rate (HR) will be measured by pulse oximetry.
|
Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
|
Cardio-respiratory measurement, oxygen saturation
Time Frame: Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
Oxygen saturation (SaO2) will be measured by pulse oximetry.
|
Before phase 1 (T1, pre intervention), after phase 1 (T2, after 8 weeks intervention), before phase 2 (T3, pre intervention) and after phase 2 (T4, after 8 weeks intervention).
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Parameters of the RAGT intervention, total time
Time Frame: During RAGT intervention sessions (8 weeks).
|
During the RAGT intervention sessions, the following will also be recorded: Total session time (in minutes). |
During RAGT intervention sessions (8 weeks).
|
|
Parameters of the RAGT intervention, distance.
Time Frame: During RAGT intervention sessions (8 weeks).
|
During the RAGT intervention sessions, the following will also be recorded: number of steps and distance walked (in metres), walking speed (the two-minute walk test will be used), spasticity of the lower limbs before and after walking with the robot (modified Asworth scale), range of motion of the lower limb joints, recording of cardiorespiratory variables during walking with an exoskeleton (HR pre and post session, SaO2 pre and post session), respiratory rate and the Physiological Cost Index will be calculated ((Working HR - Resting HR) / Walking speed). |
During RAGT intervention sessions (8 weeks).
|
|
Parameters of the RAGT intervention, walking speed
Time Frame: During RAGT intervention sessions (8 weeks).
|
During the RAGT intervention sessions, the following will also be recorded: walking speed (the two-minute walk test will be used), spasticity of the lower limbs before and after walking with the robot (modified Asworth scale), range of motion of the lower limb joints, recording of cardiorespiratory variables during walking with an exoskeleton (HR pre and post session, SaO2 pre and post session), respiratory rate and the Physiological Cost Index will be calculated ((Working HR - Resting HR) / Walking speed). |
During RAGT intervention sessions (8 weeks).
|
|
Parameters of the RAGT intervention, spasticity
Time Frame: During RAGT intervention sessions (8 weeks).
|
During the RAGT intervention sessions, the following will also be recorded: spasticity of the lower limbs before and after walking with the robot (modified Asworth scale). |
During RAGT intervention sessions (8 weeks).
|
|
Parameters of the RAGT intervention, range of motion
Time Frame: During RAGT intervention sessions (8 weeks).
|
During the RAGT intervention sessions, the following will also be recorded: range of motion of the lower limb joints. |
During RAGT intervention sessions (8 weeks).
|
|
Parameters of the RAGT intervention, heart rate
Time Frame: During RAGT intervention sessions (8 weeks).
|
During the RAGT intervention sessions, the following will also be recorded: cardiorespiratory variables during walking with an exoskeleton, heart rate (HR) pre and post session.
|
During RAGT intervention sessions (8 weeks).
|
|
Parameters of the RAGT intervention, SaO2
Time Frame: During RAGT intervention sessions (8 weeks).
|
During the RAGT intervention sessions, the following will also be recorded: SaO2 pre and post session |
During RAGT intervention sessions (8 weeks).
|
|
Parameters of the RAGT intervention, respiratory rate
Time Frame: During RAGT intervention sessions (8 weeks).
|
During the RAGT intervention sessions, the following will also be recorded: respiratory rate (cycles/minute) |
During RAGT intervention sessions (8 weeks).
|
|
Parameters of the RAGT intervention, Physiological Cost Index
Time Frame: During RAGT intervention sessions (8 weeks).
|
During the RAGT intervention sessions, the following will also be recorded: Physiological Cost Index will be calculated ((Working HR - Resting HR) / Walking speed). |
During RAGT intervention sessions (8 weeks).
|
|
Pain or discomfort
Time Frame: Before and after the first 5 days of treatment (week 1 of each phase)
|
Objectively measured by means of a saliva sample, analyzing the levels of salivary alpha-amylase (α-amylase) activity and salivary cortisol concentration.
The first sample represents the child's initial stress level before the intervention program, and the second sample represents the child's stress response to the intervention.
The first 5 days of conventional treatment are repeated at the same time.
(Zhao, 2015) The saliva samples will be obtained using a Salivette device and processed in the favilities of IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, IVI Foundation -La Fe Health Research Institute.
|
Before and after the first 5 days of treatment (week 1 of each phase)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: ANNA ARNAL-GOMEZ, Dr., University of Valencia
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Engsberg JR, Ross SA, Collins DR. Increasing ankle strength to improve gait and function in children with cerebral palsy: a pilot study. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2006 Winter;18(4):266-75. doi: 10.1097/01.pep.0000233023.33383.2b.
- McCormick AM, Alazem H, Zaidi S, Barrowman NJ, Ward LM, McMillan HJ, Longmuir P, Larin M, Dalton K. A randomized, cross-over trial comparing the effect of innovative robotic gait training and functional clinical therapy in children with cerebral palsy; a protocol to test feasibility. Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Apr;127:107086. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107086. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
- Peungsuwan P, Parasin P, Siritaratiwat W, Prasertnu J, Yamauchi J. Effects of Combined Exercise Training on Functional Performance in Children With Cerebral Palsy: A Randomized-Controlled Study. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2017 Jan;29(1):39-46. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000338.
- Zhao X, Chen M, Du S, Li H, Li X. Evaluation of stress and pain in young children with cerebral palsy during early developmental intervention programs: a descriptive study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Mar;94(3):169-75; quiz 176-9. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000252.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- RAGT_NEUROVELOP
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy
-
Ankara City Hospital BilkentRecruitingCerebral Palsy (CP) | Cerebral Palsy, Spastic, Diplegic | Diplegic Cerebral Palsy With Spasticity | Transcranial Magnetic StimilationTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Suleyman Demirel UniversityCompletedCerebral Palsy | Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy | Spastic Diplegia Cerebral PalsyTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Lahore University of Biological and Applied SciencesRecruiting
-
Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation HospitalCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)RecruitingCerebral Palsy (CP) | Hemiplegic Cerebral PalsyCanada
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedCerebral Palsy (CP) | Unilateral Cerebral PalsyEgypt
-
University of California, San FranciscoNot yet recruitingCerebral Palsy | Cerebral Palsy (CP) | Infant | Cerebral Palsy InfantileUnited States
-
Lahore University of Biological and Applied SciencesNot yet recruitingSpastic Diplegia Cerebral PalsyPakistan
-
IRCCS Fondazione Stella MarisNot yet recruitingCerebral Palsy (CP) | EEG | Unilateral Cerebral Palsy | Action ObservationItaly
-
IRCCS Fondazione Stella MarisUniversity of Siena, ItalyRecruitingCerebral Palsy (CP) | Motor Imagery | CP (Cerebral Palsy) | Action ObservationItaly
-
Gazi UniversityCompletedCerebral Palsy | Cerebral Palsy, Spastic | Cerebral Palsy Spastic Diplegia | Cerebral Palsy Quadriplegic | Cerebral Palsy, MonoplegicTurkey
Clinical Trials on Robot assisted gait training plus conventional physical therapy
-
Yonsei UniversityCompletedStroke | Hemiparetic Patients After Subacute StrokeKorea, Republic of
-
University Hospital of FerraraUniversità degli Studi di Ferrara; Regione Emilia-RomagnaCompletedMultiple SclerosisItaly
-
Sahmyook UniversityCompletedCerebral Palsy | Gait Disorders, Neurologic | Spastic Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy | Bilateral Spastic Cerebral PalsyKorea, Republic of
-
Yonsei UniversityRecruitingAcute Hemiplegic Stroke Including Subacute PhasesKorea, Republic of
-
Hangang Sacred Heart HospitalRecruitingBurns | Rehabilitation | Gait TrainingKorea, Republic of
-
Hangang Sacred Heart HospitalMinistry of Health, Republic of KoreaCompletedBurns | Gait Disorder, SensorimotorKorea, Republic of
-
Yonsei UniversityCompletedChronic Post-stroke Hemiplegic PatientsKorea, Republic of
-
Ankara UniversityCompletedCerebral Palsy | Physical Therapy | Motor Skills Disorders | Robotic RehabilitationTurkey
-
Erenköy Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation HospitalCompleted
-
Junwei HaoCompleted