Comparison of Two Different Video Laryngoscopes

October 17, 2024 updated by: Özlem Sezen, Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital

Comparison of Direct and Indirect Images of Two Different Video Laryngoscopes in Adult Airway Management

The aim of this study is to answer the question of whether direct laryngoscopy can be performed with videolaryngoscopes. How do the videos of the laryngoscopes provide images directly in laryngoscopy? Primary objective: To compare the images of Hugemed and Mcgrath videolarinygoscope in direct laryngoscopy and indirect laryngoscopy secondary objective: to compare the effects on haemodynamic response Participants :people who are not expected to have difficult intubation

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Direct and indirect images of hugemed and McGrath videolaryngoscope during intubation, haemodynamic responses, procedure time will be compared

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey, 34870
        • University of Health Sciences Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kirdar City Hospital Cevizli D-100 Güney Yanyol, No:47 Kartal Istanbul Turkey

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

After Ethics Committee approval and written informed consent were obtained, the study will be conducted with 70 patients aged 18-65 years and older of both sexes with American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III. Patients will be divided into two groups by closed envelope method.

McGrath video laryngoscope (MG) will be used in patients in group MC; Modified Cormack Lehane score and POGO score in direct laryngoscopic images and Modified Cormack Lehane score and POGO score in indirect laryngoscopic images of the patients will be evaluated and recorded and then orotracheal intubation will be performed.

Hugemed videolaryngoscope (HG) will be used in patients in group H and orotracheal intubation will be performed after the Modified Cormack Lehane scores and POGO scores obtained from direct laryngoscopic and indirect laryngoscopic images of the patients are recorded.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

To be between 18 -65 years old Mallampati score I-II Cormack-Lehane score I-II ASA physical status I-II who required endotracheal intubation for elective surgery

Exclusion criteria Pregnancy Mallampati score III-IV Cormack-Lehane score III-IV ASA physical score III-IV sternomental distance < 12.5 cm mandibular-hyoid distance < 6 cm

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Group MC McGrath videolaryngoscope Group H Hugmed Videolaryngoscope

All patients will receive intravenous premedication with midazolam 0.03 mg/kg approximately 30 minutes before induction of anaesthesia. Preoperatively, standard monitoring included a 3-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) with continuous ST-segment analysis and assessment of peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) and intermittent non-invasive blood pressure. Following preoxygenation with 100% oxygen for three minutes, general anaesthesia would be induced with propofol (3mg/kg) a few minutes after injection of fentanyl (2µg/kg). Neuromuscular paralysis will be induced with rocuronium (0.5 mg/kg) in all patients.In group MC, direct and indirect Modified Cormack Lehane score and POGO score will be evaluated with McGrath videolaryngoscope.

In Group H, direct and indirect Modified Cormack Lehane score and POGO score will be evaluated with Hugemed videolaryngoscope.

The present study will compare the images of two different VLs with Macintosh blades (the McGrath videolaryngoscope and the Hugemed videolaryngoscope) in both indirect (screen images) and direct (images viewed through the mouth) laryngoscopy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of Direct and Indirect Images of Two Different Video Laryngoscopes in Adult Airway Management
Time Frame: 3 months

Videolaryngoscopy (VL) is a frequently used method in airway management to improve the success of tracheal intubation in recent years. VLs have a miniature video camera at the tip of the blades which allows indirect visualisation of the glottis (1,2,3).

The American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) recommends that a VL should be available and used for all patients with a particularly difficult airway and for whom intubation is planned In recent years, a number of VLs have emerged that offer several advantages over direct laryngoscopy.It is aimed to compare direct and indirect images of mcgrath and hugemed videolaryngoscope.

3 months
Comparison of Direct and Indirect Images of Two Different Video Laryngoscopes in Adult Airway Management
Time Frame: 3 months
The principal objective of this study was to undertake a comparative analysis of the images produced by two distinct VLs during direct and indirect laryngoscopy
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 17, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 17, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Sezen

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anesthesia

Clinical Trials on endotracheal intubation with videolaryngoscope

Subscribe