PreventT2 Together: Examining the Efficacy of Couple-based Lifestyle Intervention to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes (PT2T)

May 28, 2025 updated by: Katherine Baucom, University of Utah
Nearly half of adults in the United States have or are at risk of developing type 2 diabetes. The overall goal of this community-engaged research is to examine the efficacy of an innovative couple-based lifestyle intervention to prevent type 2 diabetes that is applicable to a broad range of partnered adults in the United States. By simultaneously targeting lifestyle and perceived support from romantic partners, there is a high likelihood of creating lasting changes in both

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Nearly half of U.S. adults have or are at risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Lifestyle intervention is efficacious and the first line of prevention among adults at high risk for type 2 diabetes. Unfortunately, outcomes in real-world settings do not approach the initial efficacy trial findings, in part due to low rates of retention in the intervention. Real-world programs have particularly struggled to retain participants who identify as members of racial/ethnic groups that are disproportionately affected by type 2 diabetes, potentially exacerbating health disparities. Given the strong influence romantic partners have on one another and the shared environment, in which couples typically live, lifestyle interventions that systematically include romantic partners have the potential to address the research-practice gap. The purpose of this project is to examine the efficacy of PreventT2 Together, a couple-based lifestyle intervention our team developed. The specific aims of the research are: (1) to determine the efficacy of PreventT2 Together in a single-center, randomized clinical trial,(2) to examine baseline relationship satisfaction as a moderator and perceived partner support as a mechanism of lifestyle change, and (3) to quantify intervention retention and describe reach across recruitment methods. The investigators will recruit 162 couples (i.e., adults at high risk for type 2 diabetes and their romantic partners)from community and healthcare settings, over-sampling members of racial/ethnic minority groups. The investigators will randomize participating couples to individual (PreventT2; delivered only to partners at high risk) or couple-based (PreventT2 Together; delivered to couples) lifestyle intervention conditions. HbA1c and objectively measured moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) will be collected from all participants at baseline (Pre)and at the end of the 1-year intervention (Post). Participants will also report on lifestyle factors, health outcomes, and relationship functioning at each of 13-time points (Pre, monthly, during the intervention, and post). The investigators focus on the patient-centered minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in outcomes, including objectively-measured MVPA (primary outcome), as well as other aspects of lifestyle (nutrition, sleep), health outcomes (HbA1c, weight loss, stress), and relationship functioning (perceived partner support) (secondary outcomes). Situating lifestyle intervention within the romantic relationship context in which lifestyle change occurs is likely to increase reach and improve retention and lifestyle change outcomes in real-world settings. Our community-engaged approach to the development of the intervention and design of the proposed project will ensure broad applicability and dissemination of results across communities, including racial/ethnic minority groups that have not been effectively reached and retained. CDC review and approval of PreventT2 Together for use as an alternate curriculum in the National Diabetes Prevention Program (National DPP) delivered across the U.S. underscores the scalability of the intervention. If efficacious, PreventT2 Together has the potential to impact individuals and their romantic partners' quality of life and ultimately improve real-world outcomes of lifestyle intervention to prevent type 2 diabetes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

324

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84112
        • Recruiting
        • University of Utah
        • Contact:
          • Katherine JW Baucom, PhD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. "Target partner" is eligible for the National DPP per CDC eligibility requirements:

    • BMI ≥ 25 kg/m² (≥ 23 kg/m² if Asian American), and
    • Do not have a diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 diabetes, and
    • Not currently pregnant, and
    • High risk for type 2 diabetes based on: (i) CDC Prediabetes Risk Test score ≥ 5, (ii) clinically diagnosed Gestational Diabetes during a previous pregnancy (for women), or (iii) a blood test result indicative of prediabetes in the past year (i.e., fasting blood glucose 100-125 mg/dl; plasma glucose 140-199 mg/dl measured 2 hours after a 75 g glucose load; or HbA1c 5.7%-6.4%).
  2. The couple has lived together for 1+ years.
  3. Both partners are willing to participate in the research.
  4. Both partners are at least 18 years old.
  5. Both partners are fluent in English.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

  1. "Supporting partner" has a diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes.
  2. Either partner:

    • Has a diagnosis of another chronic disease (unless no major events/changes for 3+ months), or
    • Is currently on medication or engaged in lifestyle intervention for prediabetes or obesity, or
    • Has previously participated in the National DPP, or
    • Reports discomfort participating in a lifestyle program with their partner, or
    • Reports a low level of relationship commitment (i.e., "4" or lower on a scale from 1 (do not agree at all) to 7 (agree completely) on the item "I want this relationship to stay strong no matter what rough times we encounter."; Owen et al., 2011).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Individual intervention condition
"PreventT2" individual lifestyle intervention curriculum (2021 revised National DPP curriculum, freely available from the CDC)
PreventT2 will be delivered by a team of trained CDC National Diabetes Prevention Program (NDPP) Lifestyle Coaches to adults at high risk for diabetes. The 2021 version of the lifestyle intervention curriculum to be used is freely available from the CDC. The intervention will be delivered in the context of the University of Utah National DPP, which has Full recognition from the CDC based on outcome data over the course of a number of years.
Experimental: Couple-based intervention condition
"PreventT2 Together" (couple-based adaptation of PreventT2; approved by the CDC in November 2022 as an Alternate Curriculum for use in the National DPP)
PreventT2 Together will be delivered by a team of trained CDC National DPP Lifestyle Coaches to adults at high risk for diabetes and their partners. The lifestyle intervention curriculum was developed with the input of a community advisory board and was approved by the CDC for use in the National DPP (Diabetes Prevention Program) (i.e., meets CDC Diabetes Prevention Recognition Program Standards, including 22+ classes delivered over the course of 12 months and targeting lifestyle changes to prevent type 2 diabetes). In contrast to PreventT2, the intervention includes content specific to couples with prompts encouraging partners to consider and discuss how they can best support one another, information about lifestyle intervention in a relationship context, and examples demonstrating how couples collaborated to make healthy lifestyle changes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent of target partners achieving clinically meaningful increases in Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA)
Time Frame: 14 months
International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)-7 day (Pre-Intervention, Post-Intervention) and a 7-day At-Home accelerometer assessment (Pre-Intervention, Post-Intervention). International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)-7 day (Monthly during Intervention). Among participants attending intervention classes, starting at the fourth class minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) over the past week will be reported to Lifestyle Coaches. International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) questionnaires assess self-reported walking, moderate intensity, and vigorous intensity physical activity as well as overall sedentary time. Accelerometers provide objective assessments of these constructs. Intervention class participants self-report the total number of Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA) minutes over the previous week.
14 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HbA1c
Time Frame: 14 months
Assessed by the research team using the A1c Now Point of Care System.
14 months
Weight
Time Frame: 14 months
Weight in pounds will be assessed by the research team at both the Pre and Post time points using a medical grade scale. Among participants attending intervention classes, weight in pounds will be privately measured by Lifestyle Coaches before each class.
14 months
Stress
Time Frame: 14 months
Assessed with the Perceived Stress Scale measure (Possible score range: 0-24, with higher scores representing higher levels of perceived stress).
14 months
Sleep
Time Frame: 14 months
Assessed with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Version 1.0 Sleep-Related Impairment 8a (T-score range: 30-80.1, with higher scores indicating higher levels of sleep-related impairment) and the PROMIS Short Form Version 1.0 Sleep Disturbance 8a (T-score range: 30.5-77.5, with higher scores indicating higher levels of sleep disturbance).
14 months
Perceived Partner Support
Time Frame: 14 months
Assessed with the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support "special person" subscale, with the language updated to "romantic partners," consistent with prior work. This subscale assesses the amount of support individuals perceive from their romantic partners (Score range: 4-28, with higher scores indicating more perceived support from romantic partners).
14 months
Nutrition
Time Frame: 14 months

Assessed with the Automated self-administered 24-hr recall (ASA24) (Pre, Post). We will examine the following outcomes: Healthy Eating Index (HEI), total vegetable, added sugars, fiber, whole grains, refined grains, and total KiloCalorie. (HEI Score Range: 0-100, with higher scores representing sets of foods that more closely align with key dietary recommendations and patterns.)(Total Vegetable expressed in cups, added sugars expressed in teaspoon equivalents, fiber expressed in grams, whole grains expressed in ounce equivalents, refined grains expressed in ounce equivalents, and total KCal expressed in kilocalories.)

Assessed with the Rapid Eating and Activity Assessment for Participants (REAP-S; Composite Score Range 13-39, with higher scores representing higher diet quality) (Monthly).

14 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anxiety
Time Frame: 14 months
Assessed with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Version 1.0 Anxiety 8a (T-score range: 37.1-83.1, with higher scores indicating higher levels of anxiety symptoms).
14 months
Depression
Time Frame: 14 months
Assessed with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Version 1.0 Depression 8a (T-score range: 38.2-81.3, with higher scores indicating higher levels of depressive symptoms).
14 months
Fatigue
Time Frame: 14 months
Assessed with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Fatigue 7a (T-score range: 29.4-83.2, with higher scores indicating higher levels of fatigue).
14 months
Relationship Satisfaction
Time Frame: 14 months
Assessed with the Couples Satisfaction Index-16 (CSI-16), a measure of overall relationship satisfaction (Score range: 0-81, with higher scores indicating higher levels of relationship satisfaction).
14 months
Interest in Sexual Activity
Time Frame: 14 months
Assessed with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scale Version 2.0 Sexual Function and Satisfaction: Interest in Sexual Activity (T-score range: 21.9-65.8, with higher scores indicating more interest in sexual activity).
14 months
Intervention Attendance
Time Frame: 12 months
Lifestyle Coaches will record whether participants attend each intervention class. Total intervention attendance will be the total number of classes attended in-person (make-up classes, while offered to participants who miss the in-person class, will not count toward this total).
12 months
Lifestyle Coach Fidelity
Time Frame: 12 months
A DTTAC Master Trainer Select will rate Lifestyle Coach fidelity in 10% of classes.
12 months
Additional lifestyle intervention engagement
Time Frame: 12 months
Participants will respond to a single item on the questionnaire regarding whether they received additional lifestyle intervention to supplement National DPP classes. If yes, they will be asked to describe what they did as well as the frequency and duration of the intervention.
12 months
Intervention Retention
Time Frame: 12 months
Intervention Retention will be measured by whether participants meet CDC criteria for "completer" status (i.e., attend at least 9 total classes, with at least 8 classes in the first six months of the program, and at least 1 class in the second six months of the program that occurs 9 months following the first class).
12 months
Percent of individuals approached who are eligible and enroll in the study (Reach)
Time Frame: 14 months
Reach will be measured by (a) the percent of individuals approached who are eligible and enroll in the study.
14 months
Intervention Acceptability
Time Frame: 14 months
Acceptability of the individual and couple-based lifestyle interventions will be measured with the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability-Based Questionnaire
14 months
Pain Interference
Time Frame: 14 months
Assessed with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference Short Form Version 1.0 4a (T-score range: 41.6 - 75.6 with a higher score indicating more pain interference.)
14 months
Daily Report of Social Control
Time Frame: 14 months
Assessed with the Daily Report of Social Control Measure (Score Range 1-2 with lower scores indicating more Social support from partners.)
14 months
Communal Coping
Time Frame: 14 months
Assessed with the Theoretical Model of Communal Coping (TMCC) Appraisal and Action Subscales. (Score Range of 33-50, with higher scores indicating more shared appraisal or action.)
14 months
The Accountable Health Communities Screening Tool
Time Frame: 14 months
Assessed with the Accountable Health Communities Core Health-Related Social Needs Screening Questions. (No score range, but underlined answer options indicate positive responses for the associated health-related social need.)
14 months
Health Care Access and Preventive Health Screenings
Time Frame: 14 months
Assessed with questions from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS.) (No Score Range, but questions indicate health care access, occurrence of preventive health screenings, as well as delay or missing health care intervention due to cost avoidance.)
14 months
Percent of supporting partners who enroll in the study that are at high risk for type 2 diabetes based on the Pre HbA1c and self-report questionnaires (Reach)
Time Frame: 14 months
Reach will be measures by the percent of supporting partners who enroll in the study that are at high risk for type 2 diabetes based on the Pre HbA1c and self-report questionnaires
14 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Katherine JW Baucom, PhD, University of Utah

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 6, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 12, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 30, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 166946
  • 1R01DK140177-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on Individual intervention condition (PreventT2)

Subscribe