Evaluating Intact Fish Skin Graft and Standard of Care Versus Standard of Care Alone in Nonhealing Venous Leg Ulcers (THOR)

January 22, 2025 updated by: Kerecis Ltd.

A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Clinical Trial Evaluating Intact Fish Skin Graft and Standard of Care Versus Standard of Care Alone in Nonhealing Venous Leg Ulcers

The purpose of this study is to determine the between-arm difference in the proportion of subjects achieving complete closure of hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers (VLU) between Intact Fish Skin Graft plus standard of care (IFSG/SOC) versus standard of care alone (SOC) over 12 weeks.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial evaluating intact fish skin grand and standard of care vs. standard of care alone in nonhealing venous leg ulcers. The product classifies as a medical device and consists of a full thickness fish-skin that has been processed using Kerecis™ Limited's proprietary EnviroIntact™ method.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Monroeville, Pennsylvania, United States, 15146

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects must be at least 18 years of age or older.
  2. Subjects must have a nonhealing venous leg ulcer present for a minimum of 4 weeks and cannot have received more than 52 weeks of high-level compression prior to the initial screening visit.
  3. No visible signs of healing objectively, less than 40% reduction in wound size in the last 4 weeks.
  4. At randomization, subjects must have a target ulcer with a minimum surface area of 1 cm2 and a maximum surface area of 25 cm2 measured post-debridement.
  5. The affected limb must have adequate perfusion confirmed by vascular assessment. Any of the following methods performed within 3 months of the first screening visit are acceptable:

    1. ABI between 0.7 and ≤ 1.3;
    2. TBI ≥ 0.6;
    3. TCOM ≥ 40 mmHg;
    4. PVR: biphasic.
  6. If the potential subject has two or more ulcers, and they are separated by at least 2 cm post-debridement, the largest ulcer satisfying the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be designated as the target ulcer. If the potential subject has two or more ulcers and they are separated by less than 2cm, the entire wound area is designated as the target ulcer.
  7. Subjects must have a Functional Ambulatory Category Score (FACS) of 3 or greater.
  8. Subjects must consent to using the prescribed compression method for the duration of the study.
  9. Subjects must agree to attend the weekly study visits required by the protocol.
  10. Subjects must be willing and able to participate in the informed consent process.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The potential subject is known to have a life expectancy of < 6 months.
  2. The index ulcer is determined to be due to a condition other than venous insufficiency.
  3. The target ulcer exposes muscle, tendon, or bone.
  4. The target ulcer exhibits overt clinical signs and symptoms of infection with cellulitis surrounding the wound margin.
  5. The target ulcer has known or suspected skin malignancy.
  6. The target ulcer has been previously exposed to radiation.
  7. The target ulcer duration is greater than one year having received high level compression without closure for a year or more.
  8. The potential subject has end stage renal disease requiring dialysis.
  9. The potential subject is receiving immunosuppressants (including systemic corticosteroids at doses greater than 10 mg of prednisone per day or equivalent) or cytotoxic chemotherapy or is taking medications that the PI believes will interfere with wound healing (e.g., biologics).
  10. A potential subject who, in the opinion of the investigator, has a medical or psychological condition that may interfere with study assessments.
  11. The potential subject was treated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) or a cellular or tissue-based product (CTP) in the 30 days prior to the initial screening visit.
  12. The potential subject has a malnutrition indicator score <17 as measured on the Mini Nutritional Assessment.
  13. The potential subject has glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) greater than or equal to 12% within 3 months of the initial screening visit.
  14. The surface area of the target ulcer has reduced in size by more than 20% in the 2 weeks prior to the initial screening visit ("historical" run-in period). Digital planimetry is not required for measurements taken during the historical run-in period (e.g., calculating surface area using length X width is acceptable).
  15. The surface area measurement of the target ulcer decreases by 20% or more during the active 2-week screening phase: the 2 weeks from the initial screening visit (SV-1) to the TV-1 visit during which time the potential subject received SOC.
  16. The potential subject has a Functional Ambulatory Category Score (FACS) of less than 3.
  17. The potential subject has a body mass index (BMI) greater than 42
  18. In the last 8 weeks the patient has undergone revascularization (surgical or stenting) to the affected leg.
  19. Venous intervention in the affected limb in the last 30 days.
  20. Presence of any condition (including current drug or alcohol abuse, medical or psychiatric condition) that is likely to impair understanding of or compliance with the study protocol in the judgment of the Investigator.
  21. Pregnancy at enrollment or women who are breastfeeding, or women of childbearing potential who are planning to become pregnant during the time of the study OR are unwilling/unable to use acceptable methods of contraception (birth control pills, barriers, or abstinence).
  22. Know allergy to any of the components of fish skin or bovine collagen.
  23. Participation in a clinical trial involving treatment with an investigational product within the previous 30 days.
  24. A subject with a disorder that would create unacceptable risk of post-operative complications is excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard of Care
Standard of care will be cleaning, debridement, ulcer moisture balance, and offloading.
Beginning at the screening visit, participants will receive weekly treatment with standard of care (cleaning, debridement, ulcer moisture balance, and offloading) until ulcer closure, or a maximum of 12 weeks, whichever occurs first.
Experimental: Intact Fish Skin Graft (IFSG) + Standard of Care
Up to 12 visits with Intact Fish Skin Graft (IFSG) + Standard of Care.
Participants will receive weekly applications of MariGen and Standard of Care until ulcer closure, or a maximum of 12 weeks, whichever occurs first.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The percentage of target ulcers achieving complete wound closure
Time Frame: [Time Frame: 1-12 Weeks]
The percentage of target ulcers achieving complete wound closure in 12 weeks
[Time Frame: 1-12 Weeks]

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to closure
Time Frame: [Time Frame: 1-12 weeks]
The time to closure of the target ulcers over 12 weeks.
[Time Frame: 1-12 weeks]
Percent area change
Time Frame: [Time Frame: 1-12 weeks]
Percentage wound area change from TV-1 to TV-13 measured weekly with digital photographic planimetry and physical examination.
[Time Frame: 1-12 weeks]
Adverse Events
Time Frame: [Time Frame: 1-12 weeks]
The number of adverse events.
[Time Frame: 1-12 weeks]
Change in pain in target ulcer
Time Frame: [Time Frame: 1-12 weeks]
Change in pain in the target ulcer assessed using the Visual Analog Scale VAS scale from TV-1 to TV-13
[Time Frame: 1-12 weeks]
Visits and product applications needed to close the ulcer
Time Frame: [Time Frame: 1-12 weeks]
The number of visits and product applications needed to close the ulcer
[Time Frame: 1-12 weeks]
Quality of life using the Wound quality of Life questionare wQOL
Time Frame: [Time Frame: 1-12 weeks]
Change in quality of life using the wQOL checklist [TV-1, TV-4, TV-8, and TV-12/Final Visit].
[Time Frame: 1-12 weeks]
Determine improvement in Quality of Life - Forgotten Wound Score FWS
Time Frame: [Time Frame: 1-12 weeks]
Quality of Life assessed using the Forgotten Wound Score. The scale has a score of 0 to 100- 100 being the worst outcome meaning the wound bothers the subject most of the time. [TV-1, TV-4, TV-8, and TV-12/Final Visit].
[Time Frame: 1-12 weeks]

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 25, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Venous Leg Ulcers

Clinical Trials on Standard of Care

Subscribe