Study: Tea(m)Time - Strengthening the Team Resilience of Hospital Staff Through the Tea(m)Time Intervention

March 19, 2026 updated by: Ivonne Ledtermann, Catholic University of Applied Sciences Mainz

Study: Tea(m)Time - Strengthening the Team Resilience of Hospital Staff: A Quasi-experimental, Quantitative Pre-post Intervention Study

Employees in hospitals are exposed to various stressors and can be at risk of psychological stress. To counteract this, resilience programs are increasingly being offered. Most interventions focus on individual resilience. In this study, the focus is on the resilience of teams. For this reason, this research paper will focus on the Tea(m)Time intervention. Tea(m)Time is a health promotion intervention that combines the risk assessment of mental stress with a focus on team resilience. In order to generate knowledge about the Tea(m)Time intervention, this study aims to identify factors that promote and inhibit its implementation and mediate its effectiveness. The aim is to gain insights into the promotion of resilience in teams. The aim is to conduct the survey of the participants in the intervention group and the control group at three different points in time.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Bad Kreuznach, Germany, 55543
      • Bad Kreuznach, Germany, 55583
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Geriatrische Fachklinik Rheinhessen-Nahe
      • Meisenheim, Germany, 55590
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Gesundheitszentrum Glantal

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • be at least 18 years old
  • have sufficient knowledge of German
  • are not on sick leave at time t0
  • work in one of the planned clinics

Exclusion criteria:

  • be younger than 18 years old
  • do not have sufficient knowledge of German
  • are on sick leave at time t0
  • do not work in one of the planned clinics

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control group
Receives no intervention
Experimental: Tea(m)Time

Tea(m)Time intervention: Tea(m)Time is divided into two phases, starting with the qualification of team leaders.

The qualification is followed by the implementation of Tea(m)Time in the various teams.

Tea(m)Time is divided into two phases, starting with the qualification of team leaders. This starts with knowledge transfer about healthy leadership, resilience, occupational health and safety, posture work, psychological empowerment, agile management and the role of the manager. The team leaders also learn various moderation/coaching techniques. The qualification is followed by the implementation of Tea(m)Time. The teams start each hour with self-reflection. This is followed by a stress assessment and prioritization. The teams then work on the problems identified and look for solutions together.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
FITOR questionnaire (questionnaire on individual, team and organizational resilience)
Time Frame: t0 baseline, t1 6 months follow-up, t2 12 months follow-up
Schulte, E.M. et al. (2021)
t0 baseline, t1 6 months follow-up, t2 12 months follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Big-Five-Inventory-10 (BFI-10)
Time Frame: t0 baseline
Rammstedt, B. et al. (2012)
t0 baseline
Psychological empowerment
Time Frame: t0 baseline, t1 6 months follow-up, t2 12 months follow-up
Schermuly, C.C. (2019)
t0 baseline, t1 6 months follow-up, t2 12 months follow-up
Instrument to Measure the Culture for Psychological Empowerment in Organizations (IMPEC)
Time Frame: t0 baseline, t1 6 months follow-up, t2 12 months follow-up
Schermuly, C.C. et al. (2022)
t0 baseline, t1 6 months follow-up, t2 12 months follow-up
Organizational Commitment Questionnaire (OCQ-G) German version of the Organizational Commitment Questionaire
Time Frame: t0 baseline, t1 6 months follow-up, t2 12 months follow-up
Maier, G.W. & Woschée, R. (2014) individual items were used
t0 baseline, t1 6 months follow-up, t2 12 months follow-up
Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale II (AITCS-II)
Time Frame: t0 baseline, t1 6 months follow-up, t2 12 months follow-up
Orchard C. (2015) individual items were used
t0 baseline, t1 6 months follow-up, t2 12 months follow-up
The questionnaire to record the willingness to change (FEVER)
Time Frame: t0 baseline, t1 6 months follow-up, t2 12 months follow-up
Hasler, G. et al. (2003). Testing of the German version of the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment Scale (URICA) individual items used and adapted
t0 baseline, t1 6 months follow-up, t2 12 months follow-up
German standard version of the COPSOQ (Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire)
Time Frame: t0 baseline, t1 6 months follow-up, t2 12 months follow-up
FFAW (2023) individual items were used
t0 baseline, t1 6 months follow-up, t2 12 months follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nadine Ungar, Dr., Professorship for Psychology in Healthcare

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 4, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 24, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 19, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 23-034

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Resilience, Psychological

Clinical Trials on Tea(m)Time

Subscribe