Clinical Comparison Between Stainless-steel Crown, Zirconia Crown and Bioflx Crown in Primary Molars

November 30, 2024 updated by: Delta University for Science and Technology

Clinical Comparison Between Stainless-steel Crown, Zirconia Crown and Bioflx Crown in Primary Molars: Randomized Control Trial

The purpose of this clinical trial was to compare clinically three different crowns for primary molars; stainless steel crown, zirconia crown and Bioflx crown.

the main questions it aims to answer are: is Bioflex crown is an alternative to stainless steel crown and zirconia crown? Seventy-five patients their age range between 3 and 8 years participated in this study. The participants are divided into three groups representing group A for stainless steel crown (n=25), group B for zirconia crown (n=25) and group C for Bioflx crown (n=25). Plaque index, crown retentivity and gingival index will be evaluated at evaluated at baseline, 6 and 12 months.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

75

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • El Dakhleia
      • Gamasa, El Dakhleia, Egypt, 11152
        • Delta University for Science and Technology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient within the age group of 3-8 years old.
  • Healthy children free of any systemic disease.
  • Pulpotomized or pulpectomized (endodontically treated) lower second primary molars.
  • Patients who have the behavioral rating of definitely positive or positive according to the frankl behaviour.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Patient younger than 3 years old or older than 8 years old.

    • non-Healthy children or have any systemic disease.
    • primary molars with no pulpal treatment
    • Patients who have the behavioral rating of definitely negative or negative according to the frankl behaviour.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: stainless steel crown
Participants in this arm will receive stainless steel crowns for primary teeth.
Participants in this arm received a stainless steel crown for primary teeth restoration. The crowns were selected based on the clinical assessment of the patient's dental need.
Participants in this arm received a zirconia crown for primary teeth restoration. The crowns were selected to provide a more aesthetic and durable option compared to stainless steel.
Participants in this arm received a Bioflx crown, which is a flexible, biocompatible material often used for pediatric crowns.
Experimental: zirconia crown
Participants in this arm will receive zirconia crowns for primary teeth.
Participants in this arm received a stainless steel crown for primary teeth restoration. The crowns were selected based on the clinical assessment of the patient's dental need.
Participants in this arm received a zirconia crown for primary teeth restoration. The crowns were selected to provide a more aesthetic and durable option compared to stainless steel.
Participants in this arm received a Bioflx crown, which is a flexible, biocompatible material often used for pediatric crowns.
Experimental: Bioflx crown
Participants in this arm will receive Bioflex crowns for primary teeth.
Participants in this arm received a stainless steel crown for primary teeth restoration. The crowns were selected based on the clinical assessment of the patient's dental need.
Participants in this arm received a zirconia crown for primary teeth restoration. The crowns were selected to provide a more aesthetic and durable option compared to stainless steel.
Participants in this arm received a Bioflx crown, which is a flexible, biocompatible material often used for pediatric crowns.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Plaque accumulation
Time Frame: 6 months and 12 months
Measured using the Löe and Silness index, where each of the four surfaces of the crown (buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal) was scored from 0 to 3 (0 = no plaque, 3 = abundance of soft matter). The scores from the four areas were added and divided by four to obtain the plaque index
6 months and 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
crown retention
Time Frame: 6 months and 12 months
Assessed using the USPHS criteria, where "Alpha" indicated the crown was continuous with the existing anatomic form, "Bravo" indicated a missing part of the crown but not enough to expose the underlying dentin/base, and "Charlie" indicated sufficient loss of crown substance to expose the underlying dentin/base or complete loss of the crown
6 months and 12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gingival health
Time Frame: 6 months and 12 months
Evaluated using the bleeding index according to Löe and Silness (1963), with scores of 0 (no inflammation), 1 (mild inflammation), 2 (moderate inflammation), and 3 (severe inflammation).
6 months and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 23, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 4, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

We are currently reviewing the potential for sharing individual participant data (IPD) following the completion of the study. Factors such as data privacy, participant consent, and regulatory guidelines are being considered. A final decision on data sharing will be made at the conclusion of the study, and the IPD sharing plan will be updated accordingly

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Decayed Teeth

Clinical Trials on stainless steel crown

Subscribe