Thermal Ablation Versus Parathyroidectomy for Primary Hyperparathyroidism

November 26, 2024 updated by: Ping Liang, Chinese PLA General Hospital

Thermal Ablation Versus Parathyroidectomy for Primary Hyperparathyroidism: a Multicenter Study

This study is a prospective, multicenter study designed to compare the efficacy and safety of surgical treatment versus ablation therapy (including radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation) for patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). The study will assess the impact of both treatment modalities on serum parathyroid hormone (iPTH) and calcium levels, clinical symptom improvement, bone mineral density enhancement, reduction in the incidence of urinary system stones, and postoperative complication rates. While surgical treatment has been the standard of care for PHPT, offering definitive cure, it carries inherent surgical risks and complications. Ablation therapy, as a minimally invasive approach, presents a novel alternative with reduced trauma and fewer complications. The outcomes of this study will inform clinical decision-making and potentially optimize treatment strategies for patients with PHPT.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

520

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients must have a confirmed diagnosis of PHPT based on biochemical and clinical evaluations. Biochemical evidence includes elevated parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels in conjunction with hypercalcemia (serum calcium above the normal reference range). Clinical manifestations may include, but are not limited to, bone pain, osteoporosis, kidney stones, or other symptoms related to the disease.All patients must provide written informed consent after a detailed discussion of the study procedures, potential risks, and benefits of both thermal ablation and surgical treatment options. This ensures that patients are fully aware of what participation in the study entails and have voluntarily agreed to take part.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Symptomatic patients with primary hyperparathyroidism, such as those with symptoms in any system including the kidneys, bones, gastrointestinal tract, psychoneurological system, or those with atypical symptoms such as muscle weakness, dysfunction, and sleep disorders.
  • Asymptomatic PHPT patients with any of the following conditions:

    ① Serum calcium is higher than the upper limit of the normal value by 1 mg/dL (0.25 mmol/L);

    ② There is objective evidence of renal involvement, including asymptomatic kidney stones, nephrocalcinosis, hypercalciuria (24 - hour urinary calcium level > 400 mg/dL) on renal imaging, or impaired renal function (glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min);

    ③ There is evidence of osteoporosis (bone mineral density decreased by 2.5 standard deviations at any site) and/or radiographic evidence of fragility fractures.

    ④ Age < 50 years

    ⑤ The patient cannot accept routine follow - up observation.

  • Imaging examination shows that at least one parathyroid gland is enlarged.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosis of secondary or tertiary HPT
  • severe coagulation disorder
  • severe cardiopulmonary insufficiency

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Therma ablation
Thermal ablation is a minimally invasive procedure used to treat primary hyperparathyroidism, a condition where one or more of the parathyroid glands produce excessive amounts of parathyroid hormone (PTH). The treatment involves using heat to destroy the overactive parathyroid tissue. This can be done through various methods such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation(MWA).
Parathyroidectomy
Parathyroidectomy is a surgical procedure to remove one or more of the parathyroid glands in cases of hyperparathyroidism.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
cure rate
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery or ablation
The cure rate is the probability that postoperative levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH) and blood calcium reach the target values.
6 months after surgery or ablation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
complication rate
Time Frame: within 30 days after surgery or ablation
The incidence rate of complications refers to the proportion of patients who experience complications after a surgical procedure within a certain period.
within 30 days after surgery or ablation
symptom remission rate
Time Frame: 1 year after treatment initiation
The symptom remission rate refers to the proportion of the number of patients whose symptoms have been alleviated to the total number of patients treated in the treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism, either by surgery or ablation.
1 year after treatment initiation
Normalization Probability of Serum Calcium and Phosphorus after Ablation or Surgery
Time Frame: 6 months post-treatment
The probability of normal serum calcium and serum phosphorus levels after ablation or surgical treatment for primary hyperparathyroidism is defined as the proportion of patients in whom the levels of blood calcium and blood phosphorus return to the normal physiological range among all the patients who have received either ablation or surgical procedures for this condition.
6 months post-treatment
Bone mineral density change
Time Frame: 2 years
Bone mineral density change after treatment is defined as the alteration in bone density measured by DEXA in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism after surgery or ablation.
2 years

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cosmetology Scoring(Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating Scale)
Time Frame: at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year post-procedure
The Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating Scale (SCAR) will be utilized to evaluate the cosmetic outcome following surgical or ablation treatment for primary hyperparathyroidism. The observer part of the SCAR assesses six aspects: scar spread, erythema, pigmentation abnormality, surgical marks or suture tracks, hypertrophy/atrophy, and overall impression. The patient part includes two simple questions about patient satisfaction with the scar and the degree of itching. The scale has a minimum value of 0, representing the least severe scar with the best cosmetic appearance, and a maximum value of 15, signifying the most severe scar with the poorest cosmetic result. Higher scores on this scale indicate a worse cosmetic outcome.
at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year post-procedure
Readmission Rate within 30 Days
Time Frame: within 30 days after surgery or ablation
within 30 days after surgery or ablation
All - cause mortality rate
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Evaluation of the Learning Curve for Surgical and Ablation Procedures in Treating Primary Hyperparathyroidism: Incorporating Key Performance Indicators and Patient Cure Outcomes
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 year
The learning curve for surgical or ablation procedures will be evaluated by tracking and analyzing key performance indicators, with patient cure outcomes also taken into account. These indicators encompass the time taken from the start of the procedure until its completion (operation time). Additionally, the rate of occurrence of immediate and short-term post-operative complications (like bleeding, nerve injury) is considered. Patient cure status, such as complete remission of related symptoms, normalization of relevant physiological indicators, and long-term disease-free survival, will be meticulously assessed to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness and learning the effectiveness and learning curve of these procedures.
through study completion, an average of 2 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

November 26, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 26, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 26, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 10, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

November 27, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 27, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • S2024-546-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Efficacy and Safety

Clinical Trials on Thermal ablation

Subscribe