- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06715995
Effects of Endogenous Gamma Light Stimulation on Brain Oscillations in Cognitively-normal Older Adults
Effects of Endogenous Gamma Light Stimulation on Brain Oscillations in Cognitively-normal Older Adults: a Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Study
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Some Alzheimer's disease (AD) studies have investigated the effects of gamma-frequency light stimulation on healthy older adults and AD patients; they have several limitations, including small sample sizes, short intervention durations, the use of flickering light (which may cause discomfort), and lack of rigorous randomized controlled trials. The aim of this study is to address these gaps by conducting a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial.
This study will recruit 52 cognitively healthy older adults aged 55 and above (N= 52). Participants will be randomly assigned to either the experimental group (N=26), receiving endogenous gamma non-flickering light stimulation, or the control sham group (N=26), receiving 70 Hz non-flickering light stimulation. The intervention will consist of 1 hour of daily stimulation, 7 days a week, for a total of 4 weeks (28 hours). Both participants and outcomes assessors will remain blinded to group allocation.
Resting-state EEG and cognitive assessments will be conducted at three time points: prior to the intervention (T1), post one-hour intervention (T2), and post one-month intervention (T3). Resting-state brainwave activity will be the primary outcome, with data collected at all three time points (T1, T2, and T3). As secondary outcomes, cognitive assessments will be administered at T1 and T3. Adverse events will also be recorded by participants immediately following each light stimulation session.
The primary aim of this study is to assess the immediate (T2 relative to T1) and long-term (T3 relative to T1) effects of endogenous gamma light stimulation on resting-state brainwave activity. Secondary objectives include evaluating cognitive performance and assessing the safety, user acceptance, and adherence to the intervention device. The results of this study will provide valuable insights into the potential of endogenous gamma light stimulation as a non-pharmacological intervention for cognitive decline in aging populations.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Chia-Hsiung Cheng, Ph.D.
- Phone Number: 3854 +886-3-211800
- Email: ch.cheng@mail.cgu.edu.tw
Study Locations
-
-
Guishan
-
Taoyuan, Guishan, Taiwan, 33302
- Recruiting
- Chang Gung University
-
Contact:
- Chia-Hsiung Cheng, Ph.D.
- Phone Number: 3854 +886-3-211800
- Email: ch.cheng@mail.cgu.edu.tw
-
Contact:
- Chia-Hsiung Cheng, Ph.D.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 1. Age over 55 years old.
- 2. The Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI) score is within normal ranges adjusted for age and education.
- 3. Participants have no history of severe neurological or psychiatric disorders (such as stroke, epilepsy, depression, migraine, etc.) that could affect cognitive function.
- 4. Participants have not used drugs that may affect cognitive function (e.g., benzodiazepines, anticholinergic medications, etc.).
- 5. Participants with normal or corrected vision (e.g., glasses or contact lenses) to normal levels.
- 6. Voluntary to sign the Informed Consent Form.
Exclusion Criteria:
- 1. Participants enrolled in any cognitive enhancement study within the past two months.
- 2. Participants with a history of disease that could affect cognitive function (e.g., cancer, autoimmune diseases, etc.).
- 3. Pregnant, or planning to become pregnant.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: endogenous gamma light
This device is an LED light source table lamp with a vertical surface measuring 16 cm by 22 cm.
It will be positioned within arm's reach, approximately 50 cm from the participant, to ensure continuous exposure to the light stimulation.
The active device delivers endogenous gamma light stimulation.
|
Participants will receive light stimulation using the Gamma Wave Stimulation Table Lamp (Aleddra, Inc., USA) for 1 hour per day, 7 days a week, over 4 weeks, for a total of 28 hours.
|
|
Sham Comparator: Sham (70Hz) gamma light
The sham device is identical in appearance to the active device.
It will be positioned within arm's reach, approximately 50 cm from the participant, to ensure continuous exposure to the light stimulation.
The sham device delivers 70 Hz light stimulation.
|
Participants will receive light stimulation using the Gamma Wave Stimulation Table Lamp (Aleddra, Inc., USA) for 1 hour per day, 7 days a week, over 4 weeks, for a total of 28 hours.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in gamma brain oscillations.
Time Frame: baseline (T1), post one-hour intervention (T2), post one-month intervention (T3)
|
Gamma (31-100Hz) brain oscillations obtained through resting-state EEG will evaluate the changes of gamma light stimulation intervention.
|
baseline (T1), post one-hour intervention (T2), post one-month intervention (T3)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change score of the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI).
Time Frame: baseline (T1), post one-month intervention (T3)
|
CASI will be applied to measure the participant's general cognitive ability.
The range of score is 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better performance.
|
baseline (T1), post one-month intervention (T3)
|
|
Change score of the Chinese version Verbal Learning Test (CVVLT).
Time Frame: baseline (T1), post one-month intervention (T3)
|
A nine-item of CVVLT (total recall, delayed recall) will be applied to measure the participant's memory ability, with a higher score indicating better performance.
|
baseline (T1), post one-month intervention (T3)
|
|
Change score of the WMS-III logical memory test
Time Frame: baseline (T1), post one-month intervention (T3)
|
WMS-III logical memory test (immediate recall, delayed recall) will be applied to measure the participant's memory ability.
The maximum score is 25 for each recall trial, with a higher score indicating better performance
|
baseline (T1), post one-month intervention (T3)
|
|
Change score of the Taylor Complex Figure Test (TCFT).
Time Frame: baseline (T1), post one-month intervention (T3)
|
TCFT (immediate recall, delayed recall) will be applied to measure the participant's memory ability.
The maximum score is 36 for each recall trial, with a higher score indicating better performance.
|
baseline (T1), post one-month intervention (T3)
|
|
Performance changes of the Trail Making Test Form A/B (TMT-A/B).
Time Frame: baseline (T1), post one-month intervention (T3)
|
TMT-A/B will be applied to measure participant's attention and executive function. The number of seconds to complete each trial and the number of errors would be recorded, with a higher value indicating greater impairment. |
baseline (T1), post one-month intervention (T3)
|
|
Subjective cognition decline complaint survey.
Time Frame: baseline (T1), post one-month intervention (T3)
|
A 14-item Subjective Memory Complaints Questionnaire measured memory impairment.
The response was restricted to either "Yes" or "No".
|
baseline (T1), post one-month intervention (T3)
|
|
Change score of the category Verbal Fluency Test (VFT).
Time Frame: baseline (T1), post one-month intervention (T3)
|
The category VFT will be applied to measure the participant's language and executive function, with a higher score indicates better performance.
|
baseline (T1), post one-month intervention (T3)
|
|
Safety/Adverse event outcome measure.
Time Frame: Throughout the one-month intervention
|
Adverse events, such as fatigue, headache, dizziness, dazzling, ocular pain, and others, will be recorded using a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 'not at all' to 'extremely uncomfortable' (0 = not at all, 1 = minimal discomfort, 2 = mild discomfort, 3 = tolerable, 4 = severe discomfort, 5 = extreme discomfort). Participants will report adverse events (such as fatigue, headache, dizziness, dazzling, ocular pain, and others) using a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 'not at all' to 'extremely uncomfortable' after each light stimulation session. |
Throughout the one-month intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 202401421B0A3
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cognitively Normal Older Adults
-
University of North Carolina, GreensboroNational Institute on Aging (NIA)Completed
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Institute on Aging (NIA)Active, not recruitingCognitive Impairment | Aging | Mild Cognitive Impairment | Cognitive Training | Cognitive Aging | Cognitively Normal Older AdultsUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedCognitive Impairment | Aging | Mild Cognitive Impairment | Cognitive Training | Cognitive Aging | Cognitively Normal Older AdultsUnited States
-
University of MinnesotaRecruitingCognitively Normal | NeurotypicalUnited States
-
Ling YangCompletedOlder Adults | Older Adults (65 Years and Older)China
-
University of OklahomaRecruiting
-
University of West AtticaCompletedHealthy Older Adults | Community Dwelling Older Adults | Older Adults (65 Years and Older)Greece
-
KU LeuvenCompletedHealthy Older Adults | Ill Older AdultsBelgium
-
Rong ZhangNational Institute on Aging (NIA); Michigan State University; Texas Health ResourcesRecruitingHypertension | Subjective Cognitive Decline | Cognitively Normal Older Adults | Family History of DementiaUnited States
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterWashington University School of Medicine; University of Kansas Medical Center; Pennington Biomedical Research Center and other collaboratorsCompletedHypertension | Subjective Cognitive Decline | Cognitively Normal Older Adults | Family History of Alzheimer's DiseaseUnited States