Comparison of the Effects of Hydromorphone and Nalbuphine Patient Controlled Analgesia in Postoperative Pain After Cesarean Section

April 10, 2025 updated by: Xianwei Zhang,MD, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Cesarean section is an essential surgical procedure in obstetrics, which not only addresses dystocia and certain obstetric syndromes, ensuring the safety of the maternal participants, but also increases perinatal survival rates and can save the mother's life. However, the surgical trauma and uterine contractions resulting from cesarean delivery lead to severe pain, which can hinder the mother's postoperative recovery and negatively affect her mental health. Therefore, improving postoperative pain management and addressing issues such as depression and anxiety are crucial challenges in clinical practice today.

Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCA) is widely used in postoperative pain management after cesarean section due to its ability to maintain the minimum effective drug concentration, minimal fluctuation in drug levels, ease of management, and no restriction on activity. However, research on the effects and adverse reactions of hydromorphone and nalbuphine for postoperative pain relief in cesarean section is limited.

In this study, the investigators aim to compare the effects of hydromorphone hydrochloride and nalbuphine in obstetric PCA and examine how various clinical factors influence pain outcomes and adverse reactions. Based on multivariate analysis, the investigators further aim to construct and validate a predictive model for poor analgesic outcomes. To develop more personalized strategies for postoperative pain management following cesarean section, more personalized guidance strategies for postoperative pain management following cesarean section.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

240

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Hubei
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430030
        • Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Pregnant women planning to undergo cesarean section surgery

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age range from 20 to 50 years old;
  • ASA grades I to III;
  • Full term pregnancy and planned cesarean section with transverse incision in the lower segment of the uterus;
  • Pregnant women who are willing to participate in this study and sign informed consent forms.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have a history of dementia, mental illness, or any central nervous system disorder;
  • Pregnant women who are addicted to alcohol and drugs;
  • Difficulty in follow-up or poor patient compliance;
  • Has taken other investigational drugs or participated in other clinical trials in the three months prior to being selected for the study;
  • Serious complications occur during delivery;
  • Unable to cooperate with the research for any reason.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Cesarean section surgery
Observational study
Observational study without intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of pain after caesarean section
Time Frame: 2024-12-05-2025-05-30
Assessment of chronic postoperative pain by Brief Pain Inventory from 0 to ten, The higher the score, the stronger the pain
2024-12-05-2025-05-30
Incidence of inadequate analgesia
Time Frame: 2024-12-05-2025-05-30
Postoperative pain is represented by NRS score (0-10). The higher the NRS score, the more severe the pain. A NRS score of ≥ 4 is considered inadequate analgesia.
2024-12-05-2025-05-30

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse effects of postoperative analgesia
Time Frame: 2024-12-05-2025-05-30
Incidence and the risk factors of adverse effects of postoperative analgesia
2024-12-05-2025-05-30
Usage of patient controlled analgesia (PCA)
Time Frame: 2024-12-05-2025-05-30
Assessment of PCA Press Count and PCA Consumption
2024-12-05-2025-05-30
Diclofenac sodium dosage
Time Frame: 2024-12-05-2025-05-30
Diclofenac sodium dosage after caesarean section
2024-12-05-2025-05-30
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 2024-12-05-2025-05-30
Assessment of patient satisfaction by score from 0 to ten, The higher the score, the more satisfied the patient.
2024-12-05-2025-05-30
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: 2024-12-05-2025-05-30
Assessment of the length of hospital stay
2024-12-05-2025-05-30

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Regression analysis of inadequate analgesia
Time Frame: 2024-12-05-2025-05-30
Univariate and multivariate regression analysis of inadequate postoperative analgesia. Postoperative pain is represented by NRS score (0-10). The higher the NRS score, the more severe the pain. A NRS score of ≥ 4 is considered inadequate analgesia.
2024-12-05-2025-05-30
Acute postoperative pain predictive model
Time Frame: 2024-12-05-2025-05-30
Development and validation of a predictive model for acute postoperative pain after cesarean section.
2024-12-05-2025-05-30

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 4, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 20, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 21, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 29, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

December 4, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Observational study without intervention

Subscribe