Upper-limb Functional Recovery With Virtual Reality System (BTs-Nirvana) Associated With Conventional Therapy in Hospitalized Subacute Stroke Patients

December 2, 2024 updated by: Lorena Aguilar Cano

The goal of this pilot study is to evaluate if a semi-inmersive virtual reality device works in the recovery of the function of the upper limb affected in hospitalized patients who have suffered a stroke.

Reseachers will compare the virtual reality device plus the usual treatment to usual treatment to see if virtual reality device works to recovery upper limb function.

Participants will be able to receive conventional treatment or virtual therapy plus conventional treatment 5 days a week for 4 weeks.

When they are discharged, they will come to the hospital 2 times to be reviewed, 3 months and 1 year after receiving treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Málaga, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario Regional de Málaga

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke confirmed by neuroimaging.
  • No previous stroke.
  • Subacute phase (between 1 and 6 months after the stroke).
  • Ability to sit with or without support.
  • Maximum 4 on the Muscle Strength Scale (MRC) for shoulder flexion and flexion-extension of the elbow of the upper limb on the affected side.
  • Ability to understand and accept study procedures and to sign an informed consent having been previously informed.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous history of brain injury, stroke and neurological or neuropsychiatric diseases.
  • Cognitive alterations, dementia, aphasia or other alteration that causes inability to understand the meaning of the study.
  • Clinical inestability
  • Loss of visual capacity that difficults recognizing figures on the screen.
  • Orthopedic conditions involving upper limbs.
  • Refusal to participate in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental group
This arm receives the virtual therapy plus the usual treatment
Virtual therapy has been applied for four weeks, three times a week. We administered a total of twelve sessions with a duration of 30 minutes each. Prior to virtual therapy experimental group have received kinesitherapy for 15 minutes to improve and prevent muscle spasticity and joint contractures. Therapists recorded the order of the session and they have providen the same external aid to all patients. Two days a week the experimental group have received the conventional treatment for 45 minutes (kinesitherapy, strengthening exercises muscle, trunk control, transfers, standing and walking). In addition to physiotherapy treatment, participants have done occupational therapy 5 days a week (training to perform ADLs, tracking techniques and search, manipulation, reach and grasping of different utensils, etc.), for 30 minutes each session.
Other: Control Group
This arm receives the usual treatment at the same dose and time than experimental group
Patients assigned to the control group have received the conventional treatment five days a week. They have done physiotherapy session and occupational therapy for 45 and 30 minutes a day each one.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Upper limb motor function as assessed by Fugl-Meyer Upper-Limb scale (FM-UL)
Time Frame: at baseline, 4 weeks, 3 months and a year after treatment
The maximum value of the motor function in the FM-UL scale is 66 points. A higher score corresponds to a better state of operation of the patient.
at baseline, 4 weeks, 3 months and a year after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Daily-life activities as assessed as Barthel Index (BI)
Time Frame: at baseline, 4 weeks, 3 months and a year after treatment
BI evaluates 10 daily-life activities: eating, wash, dress, groom, defecate, urinate, go to the toilet, move, chair-bed, ambulation, going up and down stairs. The total score ranges from 0 to 100. The global results are grouped into four categories of dependency: total, severe, moderate or mild. Lower score means subject has more dependence ant higher score means more independence.
at baseline, 4 weeks, 3 months and a year after treatment
Trunk control as assessed as Control Trunk Test (TCT)
Time Frame: at baseline, 4 weeks, 3 months and a year after treatment
TCT is a simple test that explores four movements. Each of the sections are scored as follows: 0 points if the patient is unable to perform the movement without assistance, 12 points if able to perform the movement abnormally and 25 points if the patient is able to complete the movement normally. The total score is the sum of the results of the four tests and its value can range from 0 to 100.
at baseline, 4 weeks, 3 months and a year after treatment
Daily-life activities as assessed as Self-Assessment of Role Performance and Activities of Daily Living (SARA-TM)
Time Frame: at baseline, 4 weeks, 3 months and a year after treatment
SARA-TM is a questionnaire that users fill out with the orientation of the therapists. It is based on their perceptions of various daily-life activities. We have asked about items related to self-care, food, maintenance of postures, movement, manipulation and pain. Each one of the domains consists of different items that correspond to different activities. Each item is scored from 0 to 4 depending on the degree of difficulty in performing the activities. Lower values represent better function
at baseline, 4 weeks, 3 months and a year after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 17, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 3, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

April 3, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 27, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

December 6, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Subacute Stroke

Clinical Trials on Virtual therapy

Subscribe