IP-coated Revision Hip Implants (HIPrevision)

January 9, 2026 updated by: Aesculap AG

HIPrevision - A Randomized Multicenter Clinical Investigation of Antimicrobial IP-Coated Revision Hip Prostheses

The primary aim of the clinical investigation is to demonstrate the efficacy of a silver-based antimicrobial coating on hip implants in the reduction of periprosthetic infections in revision hip arthroplasty due to periprosthetic infection.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The clinical investigation will include patients indicated for revision hip arthroplasty due to chronic periprosthetic infection. Subjects will either receive standard CE-marked revision hip implants or the newly developed IP (Infection prevention)- coated revision hip implants. The primary clinical benefit of the IP hip implant components remains the functional restoration of the hip joint and pain relief, as successfully shown for the uncoated predecessor devices, but additionally the IP coating is regarded ancillary to the intended purpose of the implant. Periprosthetic infections are one of the major complications in revision hip arthroplasty, leading to implant re-revision. A clinical investigation to evaluate additional measures to reduce this complication rate in revision total hip arthroplasty therefore has high clinical relevance.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

268

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Berlin, Germany, 10117
        • Recruiting
        • Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin
        • Contact:
          • Sebastian Meller, Dr.
      • Otwock, Poland, 05-400
        • Recruiting
        • Gruca Orthopedic and Trauma Teaching Hospital, Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny im. prof. Adama Grucy CMKP
        • Contact:
          • Jerzy Białecki, Prof. Dr.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients > 18 years
  • Patients indicated for unilateral cementless acetabular and hip stem revision due to chronic periprosthetic infection (according to EBJIS definition): single-stage or two-stage surgical procedure according to clinical standard at the clinical investigation site
  • According to the assessment of the clinical investigator, the subject is therapy compliant and able to attend the follow-up visits
  • ASA physical status I - III
  • Patient's signed written informed consent is available

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Simultaneous participation in another interventional clinical trial (drugs or medical devices studies)
  • The investigational implant components (femoral and/or acetabular) are not suitable for the patient anatomy or bone defect
  • Patients who require plate osteosynthesis at the implantation site
  • Patients with an already implanted silver-coated device
  • Patients with immunodeficiency, i.e. patients currently receiving immunosuppressive therapy or patients with severe immunodeficiency requiring drug therapy
  • Patients currently undergoing cancer treatment, e.g. chemotherapy or radiation therapy
  • Severe soft tissue defects that require local or free flap procedure
  • Periprosthetic joint infections with evidence of fungal infection
  • Antibiotic suppression therapy
  • BMI > 40 kg/m2
  • Pregnancy, breast-feeding, or women of childbearing potential and not taking adequate contraceptive precautions
  • Known or patient reported hypersensitivity to silver or titanium
  • Patients held in a custodial setting
  • Patients in a relationship of dependence on the sponsor, the clinic or the investigator
  • Patients with contraindication for the investigational and comparator devices:
  • in case of secondary diseases influencing the function of the joint implant
  • in case of severe osteoporosis or osteomalacia
  • in case of poor bone quality and osseous malformations, diseases in the area of the implant fixation, which may primarily or subsequently affect the stability of the joint replacement anchorage
  • in case of non-regenerative bone conditions with lack of proximal femoral bone support and failure of defect union when use of prosthesis heads with neck length XXL is indicated

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: IP coated hip arthroplasty implants
Participants receive an infection prevention (IP) coated hip implant
Revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) due to periprosthetic joint infection
Active Comparator: Standard hip arthroplasty implants
Participants receive a standard (uncoated) hip implant
Revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) due to periprosthetic joint infection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Occurrence of periprosthetic joint infections
Time Frame: 12 months
Participants are monitored for 12 months after revision surgery. Every case of periprosthetic joint infection according to the definition of the EBJIS classification counts.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Radiographic assessment
Time Frame: 2 years post operative
radiographic measurements to assess implant migration, signs of loosening and changes in the fixation area over time
2 years post operative
Occurrence of safety issues with the new device
Time Frame: 2 years post operative
Adverse events, device failures and component revision will be monitored throughout the study to assess the safety
2 years post operative
Level of silver ion concentration
Time Frame: 12 months
Laboratory analysis will be performed to monitor silver ion concentration in biospecimen.
12 months
Changes in blood biomarkers for liver function
Time Frame: 12 months
Participants will be monitored for their level of liver enzymes (ALT, AST, GGT)
12 months
Changes in blood biomarker for kidney function
Time Frame: 12 months
Participants will be monitored for their level of kidney marker (eGFR).
12 months
Changes in blood biomarker for inflammation
Time Frame: 12 months
Participants will be monitored for their level of inflammation marker CRP.
12 months
Change of functional outcome over follow-up period (Harris Hip Score (HHS))
Time Frame: 2 years post operative

Harris-Hip-Score: The Harris Hip Score (HHS) is a clinical tool used to evaluate the function of the hip joint, particularly after hip surgery or in cases of hip disease.

The HHS consists of 10 items divided into four categories:

Pain (maximum 44 points) Function (maximum 47 points) Range of Motion (maximum 5 points) Deformity (maximum 4 points)

2 years post operative
Changes in quality of life
Time Frame: 2 years post operative

Measure Description: EQ-5D-5L

The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument used to measure health outcomes. Developed by the EuroQol Group (EQ), it assesses five dimensions (5D) of health:

Mobility Self-care Usual activities Pain/discomfort Anxiety/depression Each dimension has five levels (5L) of severity: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems

2 years post operative
Implant survival
Time Frame: 2 years post operative
Measure Description: Kaplan-Meier implant survival Kaplan-Meier Analysis is a standard statistical method to describe the survival of human subjects or medical products over a defined time period. The revision-free survival rate is the performance indicator of the product under investigation and confirms the clinical outcome of the hip prosthesis. Information on survival of the implant will be collected until the last follow-up of the study patients took place.
2 years post operative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sebastian Meller, Dr., Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 25, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 19, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

December 17, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peri-Prosthetic Joint Infection

Clinical Trials on IP Plasmafit® Revision cup (and stem) system

Subscribe