ICARE-LCS QUERI Partnered Evaluation Initiative: Integrating Comprehensive Tobacco Treatment to Enhance Lung Cancer Screening (ICARE-LCS)

May 21, 2026 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development

ICARE-LCS QUERI Partnered Evaluation Initiative: Integrating Comprehensive Tobacco Treatment to Enhance Lung Cancer Screening (PEC 24-239)

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death among Veterans with 90% of cases attributable to smoking. Lung cancer screening (LCS) combined with smoking cessation saves the most lives. ICARE-LCS seeks to decrease health inequality and improve Veteran health by reducing smoking rates among Veterans receiving LCS. ICARE-LCS will use implementation methods to inform national cancer prevention efforts and build infrastructure necessary to support broad implementation of high-impact tobacco dependence treatment (TDT) processes in LCS programs.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The primary goal is to improve the delivery of tobacco dependence treatment (TDT) within Veterans Affairs (VA) lung cancer screening (LCS) programs. LCS with annual low-dose computed tomography saves lives through the early detection of lung cancer and is being broadly deployed, now at 113 VA medical centers. Due to the eligibility criteria selecting for current or previous smoking, 50-60% of LCS participants currently smoke. Modeling studies support that integrating TDT into LCS nearly doubles the benefit of the screening itself. Therefore, access to high-quality TDT is a program requirement per the VA LCS guidance memo.

Though a robust integration of LCS and TDT is a VA priority, in reality there remains a gap in both reach and intensity of TDT for LCS participants. Guidelines and evidence support TDT processes that include 1) systematic assessment and connection to treatment (e.g. Ask-Advise-Connect, motivational interviewing, optout or proactive strategies) and 2) treatment that includes the evidence-based combination of intensive pharmacologic and behavioral treatments ('combined TDT'). Recent trials in LCS participants found high rates of agreeing to treatment using 'opt-out' motivational referral strategies and the highest cessation rates using a longitudinal "chronic disease" model that delivers combined TDT over a period up to a year. Unfortunately, relatively few Veterans in LCS receive any TDT and the treatment is usually inconsistent with guidelines and this evidence. In a national sample of LCS participants who smoke, only 16.4% received any pharmacotherapy for TDT, many under-dosed with short-acting nicotine replacement alone, and fewer than 1% received the recommended combination of behavioral and pharmacologic treatment. This represents a significant gap in care. Improving quality of TDT for Veterans in LCS has been identified as a priority area by multiple stakeholders including the Office of Oncology and Precision Medicine (OPM), the investigators' operational partner, the VA Lung Precision Oncology Program (LPOP), the White House Prevention and Screening Task Force, the National Committee for Quality Assurance and Veterans engagement groups. Each care process-LCS and TDT-is complex on its own, which has hampered integration. While some LCS processes are standardized across VA through use of the tools provided by the National Center for Lung Cancer Screening (NCLCS), individual LCS programs use varied care models. Programs can be 'centralized' (most LCS-related care is delivered by dedicated program staff) or 'hybrid,' where responsibilities are shared between primary care and LCS staff. NCLCS has worked with VAs across the country to enhance LCS quality and uptake. Individual LCS programs deliver combined TDT variably, and many processes are not adapted for the longitudinal, annual LCS process. The VA Tobacco Use Treatment Program Office (TUT) is currently conducting a pilot funded by the Cancer Moonshot to demonstrate feasibility of integrating TDT into LCS, recently expanded from 11 to 15 sites. The Minneapolis VA has conducted a VISN 23-Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) partnered implementation pilot to understand barriers and needs among diverse LCS programs, identifying many modifiable targets. The VISN 23 QUERI Team and TUT have collaborated to design an LCS-TDT toolkit that will soon be nationally available. While an important step, a toolkit alone may be insufficient to increase uptake of best practices. Tailored implementation support through intensive external facilitation may be necessary to effectively integrate TDT processes within the VA LCS landscape. With support from the operational partner, OPM, this project proposes to work with TUT and the NCLCS to build on existing efforts to increase participation in combined TDT for LCS participants. This project will utilize both retrospective data analysis and prospective data gathering to inform and tailor a toolkit for national dissemination. ICARE-LCS is an implementation evaluation study model.

Specific Aims:

Aim 1: Identify key process components of effective tobacco treatment programs in LCS and success factors for providing combined TDT. A mixed methods assessment will be conducted at 10 sites in the TUT Moonshot pilot, first qualitatively assessing their current TDT-LCS processes, success factors and perceived barriers to implementation of combined TDT. Data will then be linked with quantitative data of treatment participation and short-term cessation. Findings will be used to refine the toolkit for use in Aim 2 and nationally.

Aim 2: Test a multicomponent facilitation package to improve integration of TDT and LCS.

Seven programs will be identified from among LPOP sites outside of the TUT pilot, ensuring variation in site characteristics (e.g. hybrid vs centralized model), and provided implementation support using external facilitation. Sites will be matched at least 1:1 to another site in the LPOP network that will receive implementation as usual (controls). The primary outcome will be penetration (participation in combined TDT, secondary outcome any treatment) with additional secondary outcomes of fidelity (ideal TDT), and effectiveness (short-term cessation).

Aim 3: Evaluate the implementation outcomes of feasibility, acceptability, fidelity, appropriateness, and cost of implementing TDT integrated with LCS, assessed among Veterans and care team members.

Implementation outcomes other than cost will be assessed using qualitative methods. Cost will be examined related to the implementation support and to the TDT provided (e.g. LCS staff costs, pharmacotherapy, tobacco-related visits) using staff logs and VA pharmacy and billing data. Collectively, the above program evaluation will inform national cancer prevention efforts and build infrastructure necessary to support broad implementation of high-impact TDT processes in LCS programs.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

7

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55417-2309
        • Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Adam Kaplan, PhD MS
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Anne C. Melzer, MD MS
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • David B. Nelson, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Deborah Pestka, PharmD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Steven S. Fu, MD MSCE
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participating VA Medical Centers

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • This is a VAMC based Quality Improvement Partnered Evaluation Initiative. VA sites from around the country that agreed to participate are included.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • N/A

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Veterans Participating in Lung Cancer Screening who Smoke
Veterans participating in lung cancer screening who smoke and are receiving care at participating VA medical centers
Participating VA Medical Centers
Seven sites that have agreed to participate in implementation intervention
Multi-component facilitation strategy to address identified implementation needs

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Receipt of Combined Tobacco Dependence Treatment
Time Frame: Approximately 3 years
Participation in counseling and pharmacotherapy within 90 days of lung cancer screening referral
Approximately 3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cost Associated with Tobacco Dependence Treatment Among Lung Cancer Screening Participants who Smoke
Time Frame: Approximately 3 years
Evaluate facility level costs and economic impacts of tobacco treatment for patients in lung cancer screening who smoke.
Approximately 3 years
Number of Veterans Receiving ANY Tobacco Dependence Treatment Therapy
Time Frame: Approximately 3 years
Participation in ANY tobacco dependence treatment therapy (including but not limited to pharmacotherapy or counseling) for eligible Veterans in lung cancer screening who smoke
Approximately 3 years
Number of Veterans Receiving of Pharmacotherapy or Counseling Alone
Time Frame: Approximately 3 years
Participation in individual treatment options among patients in lung cancer screening who smoke. These are defined as Pharmacotherapy (nicotine replacement, bupropion, varenicline, combination treatments) and counseling (individual or group tobacco visits delivered by any modality).
Approximately 3 years
Rate of Short-term Cessation Among Veterans In Lung Cancer Screening who Smoke
Time Frame: Approximately 3 years
Short-term cessation data among eligible Veterans in lung cancer screening who smoke as gathered by chart review
Approximately 3 years
Implementation Outcomes Assessed at Participating Sites
Time Frame: Approximately 3 years
Assessing implementation outcomes by qualitative review.
Approximately 3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anne C. Melzer, MD MS, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

December 20, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Cancer Screening

Clinical Trials on External Facilitation

Subscribe