Radicle Revive 24: A Study of Health and Wellness Products on Menopausal Health and Related Health Outcomes

July 2, 2025 updated by: Radicle Science

Radicle Revive™ 24: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Direct-to-Consumer Trial Assessing the Impact of Health and Wellness Products on Hormonal Health and Associated Health Outcomes in Women With Menopausal Health Issues

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, direct-to-consumer trial assessing the impact of health and wellness products on hormonal health and associated health outcomes in women with menopausal health issues

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted with adult participants, residing in the United States.

Eligible participants (1) are females, (2) have menopausal health issues for 3 months or longer, (3) have the opportunity to improve by at least 30%, and (4) express acceptance in taking study products and not knowing the formulation identities until the end of the study.

Participants that report a known cardiac dysfunction, liver or kidney disease may be excluded. Participants that report a known contraindication or with well-established, significant safety concerns due to illness will be excluded. Heavy drinkers and women who are pregnant or breastfeeding will be excluded. Participants that report taking medications with a known contraindication or with well-established, significant safety concerns will be excluded.

Self-reported data are collected electronically from eligible participants for 7 weeks. Participant reports of health indicators will be collected at baseline, throughout the active period of study product use, and in a final survey. All study assessments will be electronic; there are no in-person visits or assessments for this real-world evidence study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

500

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Del Mar, California, United States, 92014
        • Radicle Science, Inc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults, 21 years of age and older at the time of electronic consent, inclusive of all ethnicities, races, genders and/or gender identities
  • Resides in the United States
  • Endorses less pain as a primary desire
  • Selects pain and/or looking to improve their pain as a reason for their interest in taking a health and wellness product
  • Expresses a willingness to take a study product and not know the product identity (active or placebo) until the end of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • reports being pregnant, trying to become pregnant, or breastfeeding
  • Unable to provide a valid US shipping address and mobile phone number
  • The calculated validated health survey (PRO) score during enrollment represents less than mild severity
  • Reports a diagnosis of liver or kidney disease
  • Reports being a heavy drinker (defined as drinking 3 or more alcoholic beverages per day)
  • Unable to read and understand English
  • Reports current enrollment in a clinical trial
  • Lack of reliable daily access to the internet
  • Reports current or recent (within 3 months) use of chemotherapy or immunotherapy
  • Reports taking medications with a known moderate or severe interaction with any of the active ingredients studied, or a substantial safety risk: Anticoagulants, a medication that warns against grapefruit consumption, corticosteroids at doses greater than 5 mgs per day, oral anti-infectives (antibiotics, antifungals, antivirals) to treat an acute infection, antipsychotics, or MAO

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo control 4.1.0
Revive product form 4.1 - control
Participants will use their Placebo Control Form 1 as directed for a period of 6 weeks.
Experimental: Active product 4.1.1
Revive product form 4.1 - active product 1
Participants will use their Radicle Revive Active Study Product 1.1 as directed for a period of 6 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in feelings of anxiety
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Mean difference in anxiety score as assessed by PROMIS Anxiety 4A (scale 4-20; with higher scores corresponding to more severe anxiety)
6 weeks
Change in feelings of anxiety
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Mean difference in anxiety score as assessed by PROMIS Anxiety 8A (scale 8-40; with higher scores corresponding to more severe anxiety)
6 weeks
Change in feelings of depression
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Mean difference in depression score as assessed by PROMIS Depression 4A (scale 4-20; with higher scores corresponding to more severe depression)
6 weeks
Change in cognitive function
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Mean difference in cognitive function score as assessed by PROMIS Cognitive Function 4A (scale 4-20; with lower scores corresponding to better cognitive function)
6 weeks
Change in cognitive function
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Mean difference in cognitive function score as assessed by PROMIS Cognitive Function 8A (scale 8-40; with lower scores corresponding to better cognitive function)
6 weeks
Change in sleep disturbance
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Mean difference in sleep disturbance score as assessed by PROMIS Sleep Disturbance 4A (scale 4-20; with higher scores corresponding to more severe sleep disturbance)
6 weeks
Change in sleep disturbance
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Mean difference in sleep disturbance score as assessed by PROMIS Sleep Disturbance 8A (scale 8-40; with higher scores corresponding to more severe sleep disturbance)
6 weeks
Change in fatigue
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Mean difference in fatigue score as assessed by PROMIS Fatigue 4A (scale 4-20; with higher scores corresponding to more severe fatigue)
6 weeks
Change in feelings of depression
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Mean difference in depression score as assessed by PROMIS Depression 8A (scale 8-40; with higher scores corresponding to more severe depression)
6 weeks
Change in fatigue
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Mean difference in fatigue score as assessed by PROMIS Fatigue 8A (scale 8-40; with higher scores corresponding to more severe fatigue)
6 weeks
Change in Pain Interference
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Mean difference in pain interference score as assessed by PROMIS Pain Interference 6A (scale 6-30; with higher scores corresponding to more severe pain interference)
6 weeks
Change in pain intensity
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Mean difference in pain intensity score as assessed by PROMIS Pain Intensity 3A (scale 3-15; with higher scores corresponding to more severe pain intensity)
6 weeks
Change in interest in sexual activity
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Mean difference in interest in sexual activity score as assessed by PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction v2.0 (scale 2-10; with lower scores corresponding to less interest in sexual activity)
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in feelings of anxiety
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Likelihood of achieving a MCID in anxiety, as measured by PROMIS Anxiety 4a (4-20; where lower scores indicate less anxiety).
6 weeks
Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in feelings of anxiety
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Likelihood of achieving a MCID in anxiety, as measured by PROMIS Anxiety 8a (8-40; where lower scores indicate less anxiety).
6 weeks
Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in feelings of depression
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Likelihood of achieving a MCID in depression , as measured by PROMIS Depression 4a (4-20; where lower scores indicate less depression).
6 weeks
Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in feelings of depression
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Likelihood of achieving a MCID in depression , as measured by PROMIS Depression 8a (8-40; where lower scores indicate less depression).
6 weeks
Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in cognitive function
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Likelihood of achieving a MCID in cognitive function , as measured by PROMIS cognitive function 4a (4-20; where lower scores indicate poorer cognitive function).
6 weeks
Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in cognitive function
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Likelihood of achieving a MCID in cognitive function , as measured by PROMIS cognitive function 8a (8-40; where lower scores indicate poorer cognitive function).
6 weeks
Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in sleep disturbance
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Likelihood of achieving a MCID in sleep disturbance , as measured by PROMIS Sleep Disturbance 4a (4-20; where lower scores indicate less sleep disturbance).
6 weeks
Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in sleep disturbance
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Likelihood of achieving a MCID in sleep disturbance , as measured by PROMIS Sleep Disturbance 8a (8-40; where lower scores indicate less sleep disturbance).
6 weeks
Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in fatigue
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Likelihood of achieving a MCID in fatigue, as measured by PROMIS Fatigue 4a (4-20; where lower scores indicate less fatigue).
6 weeks
Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in fatigue
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Likelihood of achieving a MCID in fatigue, as measured by PROMIS Fatigue 8a (8-40; where lower scores indicate less fatigue).
6 weeks
Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in pain interference
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Likelihood of achieving a MCID in pain interference, as measured by PROMIS Pain interference (6-30; where lower scores indicate less pain interference).
6 weeks
Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in pain intensity
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Likelihood of achieving a MCID in pain intensity, as measured by PROMIS Pain intensity (3-15; where lower scores indicate less pain intensity).
6 weeks
Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in interest in sexual function
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Likelihood of achieving a MCID in interest in sexual activity, as measured by PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction v2.0 (scale 2-10; with lower scores corresponding to less interest in sexual activity)
6 weeks
Change in other menopausal health issues
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Other menopausal health issues assessed by Radicle General Menopausal Health Issues (Point range: 10 - 48; where higher is more severe menopausal health issues)
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

December 27, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 4, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Data will not be shared with researchers outside of Radicle Collaborators on this study.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Radicle Revive Placebo Control Form 4.1

Subscribe