Rhomboid Intercostal and Subserratus Plane Block Versus Paravertebral Block for Thoracic Herpes Zoster

December 20, 2024 updated by: Xiaguang Duan

Rhomboid Intercostal and Subserratus Plane Block Versus Paravertebral Block for Thoracic Herpes Zoster: a Randomized Comparative Trial

Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a common and debilitating complication of herpes zoster, characterized by persistent and severe pain. The rhomboid intercostal and subserratus plane (RISS) block, a novel ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia technique, has shown promise for various pain conditions, but its effectiveness for treating thoracic PHN remains relatively unexplored, and comparative studies against Paravertebral (PVB) block are lacking. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of RISS block versus PVB block for thoracic herpes zoster.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, randomized, comparative, double-blinded (patient and clinician), superiority and non-inferiority clinical trial. This study compares the superiority and non-inferiority of RISS block versus PVB block for analgesia in the context of PHN. Patients were recruited from Baogang Hospital, Inner Mongolia. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Baogang Hospital, Inner Mongolia (2023-MER-301) on December 19, 2023, and adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki and the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines. All participants provided informed consent voluntarily.

Thirty patients with PHN, classified as ASA I-III, aged 44-82 years, and scheduled to receive either a RISS block or a PVB block between January 2024 and November 2024, were selected, with 15 patients per group. Inclusion criteria: Patients with typical manifestations of herpes zoster (HZ) , such as vesicular and painful rash; herpes zoster neuralgia lasting more than one month and unresponsive to conventional treatment; a VAS score ≥ 4; and thoracic nerve root involvement. Exclusion criteria: Patients who refused to provide written informed consent; were unable to cooperate with assessments; had a history of systemic autoimmune disease, organ transplantation, or cancer; had received other invasive treatments (e.g., spinal cord stimulation); had a central nervous system disorder; had coagulopathy; had a skin infection at the puncture site; or were pregnant/lactating.

Patients with PHN refractory to pharmacological treatment were considered for either RISS block or PVB block. All patients received famciclovir and gabapentin. Patients received standard antiviral treatment with famciclovir 500 mg three times daily for 7 days. Gabapentin was initiated at a dose of 300 mg/day, typically divided into three administrations. The dose was gradually increased to a maximum of 1800 mg/day as needed and tolerated. All procedures were performed in an outpatient operating room, and all participating physicians had undergone standardized training. Upon entry, electrocardiogram (ECG), blood pressure, and oxygen saturation were monitored. The patient is placed in the prone position with their arms abducted and internally rotated. Ultrasound equipment (SonoSite Edge II; Fujifilm SonoSite, Bothell, WA, USA) with a linear 13-6 MHz transducer (HFL50x; Fujifilm SonoSite, Bothell, WA, USA) was used. Each nerve block was performed by initially injecting a 5 mL test dose, observing for clinical signs of pain relief in the affected thoracic dermatome, and then injecting the remaining volume of medication after confirmation of the injection site. Patients received ultrasound-guided nerve blocks every 48 hours, for a total of three treatments.

Follow-up assessments were conducted at the pain clinic by two specially trained nurses who were blinded to patient allocation, at baseline (before therapy), on the day of treatment (Day 1), and at 7 days (Day 7), 30 days (Day 30), and 90 days (Day 90) post-treatment, either in person or via telephone.

Primary outcomes

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Inner Mongolia
      • Baotou, Inner Mongolia, China, 014010
        • Inner Mongolia Baogang Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with typical manifestations of herpes zoster (HZ), such as vesicular and painful rash
  • herpes zoster neuralgia lasting more than one month and unresponsive to conventional treatment
  • a VAS score ≥ 4
  • thoracic nerve root involvement

Exclusion Criteria:

  • refused to provide written informed consent
  • unable to cooperate with assessments
  • history of systemic autoimmune disease, organ transplantation, or cancer
  • received other invasive treatments (e.g., spinal cord stimulation)
  • central nervous system disorder
  • coagulopathy
  • skin infection at the puncture site
  • pregnant/lactating

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: RISS group
Rhomboid Intercostal and Subserratus Plane Block
Upon entry, electrocardiogram (ECG), blood pressure, and oxygen saturation were monitored. The patient is placed in the prone position with their arms abducted and internally rotated. Ultrasound equipment (SonoSite Edge II; Fujifilm SonoSite, Bothell, WA, USA) with a linear 13-6 MHz transducer (HFL50x; Fujifilm SonoSite, Bothell, WA, USA) was used. Each nerve block was performed by initially injecting a 5 mL test dose, observing for clinical signs of pain relief in the affected thoracic dermatome, and then injecting the remaining volume of medication after confirmation of the injection site. Patients received ultrasound-guided nerve blocks every 48 hours, for a total of three treatments.The RISS block is a composite nerve block technique that involves two injection sites, located in the inter-rhomboid plane and the sub-serratus plane, respectively. The choice of block plane depended on the patient's site of pain.
Active Comparator: PVB group
Paravertebral Block
The patient is placed in the prone position with their arms abducted and internally rotated. Ultrasound equipment (SonoSite Edge II; Fujifilm SonoSite, Bothell, WA, USA) with a linear 13-6 MHz transducer (HFL50x; Fujifilm SonoSite, Bothell, WA, USA) was used. Each nerve block was performed by initially injecting a 5 mL test dose, observing for clinical signs of pain relief in the affected thoracic dermatome, and then injecting the remaining volume of medication after confirmation of the injection site. Patients received ultrasound-guided nerve blocks every 48 hours, for a total of three treatments.After confirming needle tip placement, 10 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine with 10 mg of triamcinolone acetonide was slowly injected in divided doses, observing for the spread of the local anesthetic to ensure adequate distribution within the PVS for effective block. If multiple nerves were involved, the injection sites were spaced one thoracic vertebral segment apart.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numerical Rating Scale(NRS)
Time Frame: At baseline (before therapy), on the day of treatment, at 7 days post-treatment, 30 days post-treatment, and 90 days post-treatment
The NRS, Numerical Rating Scale, is a rating system from 0 to 10, where 0 represents "no pain" and 10 represents the worst possible pain.
At baseline (before therapy), on the day of treatment, at 7 days post-treatment, 30 days post-treatment, and 90 days post-treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Zoster Brief Pain Inventory (ZBPI)
Time Frame: At baseline (before therapy), on the day of treatment, at 7 days post-treatment, 30 days post-treatment, and 90 days post-treatment
The daily activity questionnaire included seven items: general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relationships with others, sleep, and enjoyment of life. Each question concerning daily activity was scored on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 indicated no interference and 10 indicated complete interference.
At baseline (before therapy), on the day of treatment, at 7 days post-treatment, 30 days post-treatment, and 90 days post-treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Xiangyu Wang, Undergraduate, Inner Mongolia Baogang Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 12, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 20, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All collected IPD, all IPD that underlie results in a publication

IPD Sharing Time Frame

January 2025-January 2027

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

A proposal that describes planned analyses must be submitted or whether a data sharing agreement must be signed.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Thoracic Herpes Zoster

Clinical Trials on Rhomboid Intercostal and Subserratus Plane Block

Subscribe