Ganglion Impar Block With Physical Therapy vs Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection With PT for Patients With Coccydynia

December 30, 2024 updated by: Muhammad Naveed Babur, Superior University

Comparison of Ganglion Impar Block With Physical Therapy Versus Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection With Physical Therapy for Patients With Coccydynia

The study aims to evaluate the efficacy of two treatment modalities for patients suffering from coccydynia: Ganglion Impar Block (GIB) combined with physical therapy, and Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection (CESI) also accompanied by physical therapy. Coccydynia, characterized by pain in the coccygeal region, can significantly impair daily functioning and quality of life.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Participants were assessed using various outcome measures, including the SF-12, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). Data collection will occur at baseline and through four follow-up points over 16 weeks, allowing for a comprehensive evaluation of both immediate and long-term treatment effects. By comparing these two interventions, the study seeks to determine which approach yields superior results in alleviating pain and improving functional outcomes for patients with coccydynia, thereby contributing valuable insights into the management of this condition.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

42

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punjab
      • Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
        • Ghurkee Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients with age 18-65 diagnosed with chronic coccydynia for at least 3 months were recruited.
  • Participants who will be willing & able to adhere to the study protocol.
  • Including participants who will be attending follow-up appointments & completing outcome measures.
  • Participants who will be able to understand & provide written informed consent.
  • Participants with a complete screening of other medical conditions and previous medical records.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with previous surgery on the coccyx or lumbosacral spine, pregnancy or breastfeeding, history of bleeding disorders or anticoagulant use, active infection, or significant medical condition that could pose a safety risk during the procedures (GIB or CESI) was omitted.
  • Patients above the age of 65 were eliminated to reduce confounding by age-related health concerns and to provide a more homogenous study population for more accurate treatment outcomes.
  • Participants with neurological conditions affecting pain perception or sensation were excluded.
  • Participants with known allergies to medications used in the study (local anesthetic, steroid for injections) were not part of the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Interventional group I
Intervention Details: Participants in this arm will receive a Ganglion Impar Block, a minimally invasive injection aimed at blocking pain signals from the coccyx region (Ganglion Impar Block using Triamcinolone Acetate (40 mg) and Bupivacaine (0.25%) administered with a 22G Spinal Needle under Fluoroscopic Guidance). Participants in this arm will receive a Ganglion Impar Block, a minimally invasive procedure involving the administration of Triamcinolone Acetate (a corticosteroid) and Bupivacaine (a local anesthetic). This is intended to block pain signals originating from the coccyx region. The procedure will be conducted under fluoroscopic guidance to ensure precise delivery. The injection will be complemented by a structured physical therapy program, including heat therapy, ultrasound, posture training, core strengthening exercises, and mobility activities to improve pain relief and functional capacity.
Active Comparator: Interventional group II
Intervention Details: Participants in this arm will receive a Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection using Triamcinolone Acetate (40 mg), Bupivacaine (0.25%), and Normal Saline (6 mL) administered with a 22G Spinal Needle under Fluoroscopic Guidance), designed to deliver anti-inflammatory medication directly to the epidural space, thereby reducing inflammation and pain. This will also be paired with a tailored physical therapy program, focusing on similar modalities as in Arm 1, including heat therapy, ultrasound, posture training, and strengthening exercises. The objective is to enhance pain relief and functional recovery in the context of coccydynia.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time Frame: 12 Months
Used as the primary outcome measure. Participants will rate their pain intensity on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst possible pain. This measure will assess changes in pain levels from baseline through various follow-up points.
12 Months
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: 12 months
The Oswestry Disability Index will serve as the secondary outcome measure. This questionnaire evaluates the degree of disability experienced by participants due to their pain, focusing on various aspects of daily living and functional capacity. Additionally, the SF-12 health survey will be used to measure the overall health-related quality of life, providing further insights into the impact of the interventions.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 13, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 30, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 30, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MSRSW/Batch-Fall22/766

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coccyx Disorder

Clinical Trials on Interventional group I

Subscribe