Effectiveness of TDCS Over Broca's Area in Verb Naming: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Study

January 10, 2025 updated by: I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia

La Stimolazione Transcranica (tDCS) E Transpinale a Corrente Diretta (tsDCS) Per Il Recupero Delle Funzioni Cognitive in Soggetti Affetti Da Patologia Cerebrovascolare O Neurodegenerativa

This clinical trial investigated whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over Broca's area (F5) could improve verb naming abilities in adults with aphasia. Additionally, the study evaluated the stability of the treatment response to tDCS over time.

The main questions this study sought to answer were:

  • Does tDCS improve verb naming abilities compared to inactive (sham) stimulation?
  • Are the observed effects stable over time?

Participants received 10 daily sessions of tDCS over two consecutive weeks (5 days per week). The study included two treatment conditions, separated by one-month washout period:

  • Active tDCS: Stimulation over Broca's area at 2 mA;
  • Sham tDCS: Stimulation mimicking the active condition without delivering electrical current.

During the treatment, participants were asked to name aloud videos of actions displayed on a computer screen. One month after each treatment condition, follow-up testing was conducted to evaluate the stability of the treatment response.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Roma, Italy, 00179
        • I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • native Italian proficiency;
  • pre-morbid right-handedness;
  • a single left hemispheric stroke at least 6 months before the investigation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • acute or chronic neurological symptoms requiring medication;
  • attention and/or memory deficits.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active tDCS
Participants receive anodic tDCS over Broca's area at 2 mA for 20 minutes per session, 5 days per week for 2 consecutive weeks.
Participants receive anodic tDCS using a battery-driven Eldith (neuroConn GmbH) Programmable Direct Current Stimulator with surface-soaked sponge electrodes (5×7 cm). A constant current of 2 mA is applied for 20 minutes per session. The stimulation targets the left frontal region (F5 of the extended International 10-20 EEG system), corresponding to Broca's area, while the reference electrode is placed over the contralateral frontopolar cortex. tDCS is performed for 10 daily sessions over two consecutive weeks (5 days per week).
Sham Comparator: Sham tDCS
Participants receive sham tDCS for 20 minutes per session, 5 days per week for 2 consecutive weeks.
Participants receive sham tDCS using a battery-driven Eldith (neuroConn GmbH) Programmable Direct Current Stimulator with surface-soaked sponge electrodes (5×7 cm). No therapeutic current is applied during the 20-minute session. The electrode placement mimics the active condition, targeting the left frontal region (F5 of the extended International 10-20 EEG system), corresponding to Broca's area, while the reference electrode is placed over the contralateral frontopolar cortex. Sham tDCS is performed for 10 daily sessions over two consecutive weeks (5 days per week).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Action Naming Task
Time Frame: Verb naming performance was assessed at baseline (pre-treatment), post-treatment (immediately after the 10-day intervention), and at follow-up (one month after each treatment condition) to evaluate both immediate effects and the stability of responses.
An action naming task was designed to evaluate verb naming performance. Video clips depicting various actions were presented on a 15-inch computer screen at a viewing distance of 1 meter, each preceded by an 800-millisecond fixation point. Participants were instructed to name the action depicted in each clip within a 15-second response window. The examiner manually recorded correct responses. For incorrect responses or failures to respond within the allotted time, the written name of the action was displayed beneath the video, and participants were required to read the name aloud. The video and the written name remained on the screen until the word was read correctly or 40 seconds had elapsed. The task was conducted during 20-minute tDCS sessions, wherein participants received either active stimulation targeting Broca's area or sham stimulation with identical electrode placement but no active current.
Verb naming performance was assessed at baseline (pre-treatment), post-treatment (immediately after the 10-day intervention), and at follow-up (one month after each treatment condition) to evaluate both immediate effects and the stability of responses.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Carlo Caltagirone, MD, PhD, Fondazione Santa Lucia, Via Ardeatina 306, 00179 Roma, Italy

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 4, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 13, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 13, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 10, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Active treatment

Subscribe