Study of Nitrate-Rich Juice on Cognitive Function in Heavy Alcohol Drinkers: a Two-Stage Adaptive Design Real-World Clinical Trial

January 10, 2025 updated by: Hongqiang Sun, Peking University Sixth Hospital
It is known that alcohol consumption can lead to cognitive impairment and dysregulation of inflammatory responses. A preliminary randomized controlled trial conducted by our research team has suggested that nitrate may improve cognition in hospitalized patients with alcohol dependence. To further expand the population and applicability, this study aims to explore the effects of nitrate on cognition in a real-world population of heavy drinkers. The researchers have designed a two-stage clinical trial: the first stage involves the analysis of existing data, and the second stage will recruit 43-54 new participants for a 14-day dietary inorganic nitrate (nitrate-rich beetroot juice, ~750 mg NO3- /d) intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

No comments

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

43

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

A. Individuals with a history of heavy alcohol consumption (as defined below), who have continued heavy drinking within the past week and have no plans to quit drinking within the next month.

B. Individuals with a history of heavy alcohol consumption who are currently hospitalized due to alcohol dependence or alcohol use disorder, and are still undergoing treatment.

The CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) defines heavy alcohol consumption as follows: For males: more than 15 standard alcoholic drinks per week. For females: more than 8 standard alcoholic drinks per week. Here, one standard drink unit is approximately 14 grams of pure alcohol- C. A Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score greater than 13.

Exclusion Criteria:

A. Individuals with a history of or current infectious diseases. B. Individuals with a history of or current severe cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, hepatic, or renal diseases.

C. Individuals who are allergic to any substances used in the trial, such as beets.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: RWS
Interventions:Dietary Supplement: nitrate-rich beetroot juice
Nitrate-rich beetroot juice, ~750 mg NO3- /d

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The number of responders with a DMS-PCAD score improvement of 6 or more after intervention compared to baseline
Time Frame: baseline and post-intervention(two weeks after baseline test)
Test by DMS-PCAD (Delayed Match to Sample Percent Correct , all delays) The score range is from 0% to 100%, with higher scores indicating better performance in visual memory and matching tasks.
baseline and post-intervention(two weeks after baseline test)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes of cognitive function from baseline to post-intervention
Time Frame: baseline and post-intervention(two weeks after baseline test)
Test by Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automatic Battery,CANTAB
baseline and post-intervention(two weeks after baseline test)
Changes of oral microbiota from baseline to post-intervention
Time Frame: baseline and post-intervention(two weeks after baseline test)
Saliva samples were used to test the composition of microbiota by 16S RNA sequencing.
baseline and post-intervention(two weeks after baseline test)
Sleep Quality
Time Frame: baseline and post-intervention (two weeks after baseline test)
Test by pittsburgh sleep quality index
baseline and post-intervention (two weeks after baseline test)
Changes of Spatial Working Memory Between Errors from baseline to post-intervention
Time Frame: baseline and post-intervention(two weeks after baseline test)
Test by SWM-BE (The Spatial Working Memory Between Errors ) The SWM-BE score range is primarily based on the number of errors, typically ranging from 0 to 10 errors. The higher the score, the fewer the errors, and the better the performance.
baseline and post-intervention(two weeks after baseline test)
Changes of inflammatory factors levels in serum from baseline to post-intervention
Time Frame: baseline and post-intervention(two weeks after baseline test)
We collected serum sampleWs were used to test the levels of inflammatory factors by Elisa
baseline and post-intervention(two weeks after baseline test)
depression
Time Frame: baseline and post-intervention (two weeks after baseline test)
Test by Self-Rating Depression Scale
baseline and post-intervention (two weeks after baseline test)
anxiety
Time Frame: baseline and post-intervention(two weeks after baseline test)
Test by Self-Rating Anxiety Scale
baseline and post-intervention(two weeks after baseline test)
Cognitive
Time Frame: baseline and post-intervention (two weeks after baseline test)
Test by Montreal Cognitive Assessment
baseline and post-intervention (two weeks after baseline test)
Dream
Time Frame: baseline and post-intervention (two weeks after baseline test)
Test by Dream Evaluation Scale
baseline and post-intervention (two weeks after baseline test)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 7, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • (2025)PKUh6(3)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heavy Drinking

Clinical Trials on Nitrate-rich beetroot juice

Subscribe