a Prospective Study of Surgical Results, Complications and Predictive Values in Chinese Women Breast Reconstruction (BEST)

January 15, 2025 updated by: Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Breast Enhanced Strategies and Techniques(BEST) (Focus on Chinese Breast Reconstruction) Trial PART 1: Evaluation of Predictive Methods of Reconstruction Outcomes--Flap Perfusion Analysis

This study prospectively evaluates and compares the effectiveness of ICG fluorescence imaging and LSCI in predicting the risk of necrosis following direct-to-implant breast reconstruction.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study prospectively evaluates and compares the effectiveness of Indocyanine Green (ICG) fluorescence imaging and Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI) in predicting the risk of necrosis following direct-to-implant breast reconstruction. The investigation includes both intraoperative and postoperative assessments of flap perfusion, with a focus on identifying specific thresholds for necrosis prediction. By analyzing the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive accuracy of each technique, the study aims to establish their respective strengths and limitations. Additionally, the research aims to explore the feasibility of using these methods in different surgical stages, evaluating their consistency and reliability in monitoring the viability of the skin flap and nipple-areolar complex.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100032
        • PUMCH

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

female patients who received mastectomy and immediate direct-to-implant reconstruction

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

All patients presenting for implant-base reconstruction immediately after mastectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

delayed reconstruction, expander removal followed by prothesis implant, ICG allergy or intolerance, autologous reconstruction

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
patients underwent immediate direct-to-implant reconstruction
Patients undergoing nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) received flap evaluations for both the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) and the peri-incision skin flap. Perfusion of the skin flap and nipple was assessed using both Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI) and Indocyanine Green (ICG) fluorescence imaging at two critical time points: immediately after the mastectomy (prior to immediate reconstruction) and again following reconstruction (after the skin was sutured).
LSCI evaluates at 2 timings:immediately after the mastectomy (prior to immediate reconstruction) and again following reconstruction (after the skin was sutured). The perfusion score was calculated by normalizing these values against the perfusion value of a control.
Performed immediately after the mastectomy (prior to immediate reconstruction) .Perfusion scores were determined by comparing the fluorescence intensity of the target area to that of the non-surgical region on the contralateral chest wall.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
necrosis
Time Frame: 3 months
Signs of necrosis included: (1) swelling or blistering, (2) dark brown or dark blue discoloration of the flap or nipple-areolar complex (NAC), (3) scab formation, (4) wound disruption, and (5) sloughing of the NAC or local flap. Severe necrosis was defined as either (4) or (5), necessitating debridement and secondary closure surgery.
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 12, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ZS-3103

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Reconstruction

Clinical Trials on LSCI

Subscribe